Value
9.8/10data confidence 20%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.8 |
- ▸Attractively valued
BUI · Why this verdict
Why BlackRock Utility, Infrastructu (BUI) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
BUI screens cheap on valuation and is in a confirmed technical breakout, but its quality score sits well below the engine's minimum floor and short-interest risk is elevated.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The quality score of 0.9 sits well below the engine's 4.0 minimum floor, driven by a Piotroski F-Score of 0 out of 9 and no identifiable competitive moat. Warnings | Quality score should recover above the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterAs with other closed-end fund vehicles, corporate quality metrics like moat and Piotroski F-Score may not meaningfully apply to a fund's true risk profile. | ||
The fund trades at an attractive valuation, with a P/E of 9.7 and peer-rank data showing it priced more cheaply than comparable peers. Valuation breakdown | The valuation discount should narrow over the next 12 months as the market recognizes the mispricing. | →Stable |
| CounterA persistently cheap valuation for a closed-end fund can reflect a structural NAV discount rather than a temporary mispricing that will close. | ||
The stock is in a technical breakout, having formed a golden cross and trading above all major moving averages with an RSI of 64 and bullish MACD. Chart pattern detection | Price should extend the breakout and remain above its key moving averages over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterBreakouts on funds with weak underlying quality scores can fail quickly once momentum fades, especially with the asymmetry gate already flagging upside as exhausted. | ||
Short interest and days-to-cover risk components are both scored near the maximum, at 9.9 and 10.0 respectively, indicating meaningful bearish positioning against the stock. Components | Short-interest risk scores should decline from their current near-maximum levels over the next 12 months if bearish pressure eases. | ↑Improving |
| CounterElevated short interest alongside a bullish breakout could instead set up a short squeeze that accelerates gains rather than validating bearish positioning. | ||
The quality score of 0.9 sits well below the engine's 4.0 minimum floor, driven by a Piotroski F-Score of 0 out of 9 and no identifiable competitive moat.
↑ImprovingWarnings
- Expectation
- Quality score should recover above the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months.
CounterAs with other closed-end fund vehicles, corporate quality metrics like moat and Piotroski F-Score may not meaningfully apply to a fund's true risk profile.
The fund trades at an attractive valuation, with a P/E of 9.7 and peer-rank data showing it priced more cheaply than comparable peers.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- The valuation discount should narrow over the next 12 months as the market recognizes the mispricing.
CounterA persistently cheap valuation for a closed-end fund can reflect a structural NAV discount rather than a temporary mispricing that will close.
The stock is in a technical breakout, having formed a golden cross and trading above all major moving averages with an RSI of 64 and bullish MACD.
→StableChart pattern detection
- Expectation
- Price should extend the breakout and remain above its key moving averages over the next 12 months.
CounterBreakouts on funds with weak underlying quality scores can fail quickly once momentum fades, especially with the asymmetry gate already flagging upside as exhausted.
Short interest and days-to-cover risk components are both scored near the maximum, at 9.9 and 10.0 respectively, indicating meaningful bearish positioning against the stock.
↑ImprovingComponents
- Expectation
- Short-interest risk scores should decline from their current near-maximum levels over the next 12 months if bearish pressure eases.
CounterElevated short interest alongside a bullish breakout could instead set up a short squeeze that accelerates gains rather than validating bearish positioning.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
0.9/10data confidence 71%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.5 |
| Piotroski F | 0.0 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 0/9
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
5.0/10data confidence 50%Momentum
3.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.0 |
| MACD | 2.2 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Oversold in uptrend (RSI 30)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
5.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
Insider
6.1/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 6.2 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.1 |
| quality rank | 5.0 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
Technical
7.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.1 |
| support resistance | 7.9 |
| 52w position | 8.6 |
Risk (lower is worse)
9.5/10data confidence 60%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.8 |
| days to cover | 9.8 |
| volatility | 9.0 |
Catalyst
8.0/10data confidence 25%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| dividend safety | 8.0 |
- ▸Dividend: 6.7%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5
Warning (1)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.7B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.7B<$5B
Investment implication
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 3.4<4.5 outcome against Value at 9.8 and asymmetric R:R of 0.00.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.8, Risk (lower is worse) at 9.5, and Catalyst at 8.0; the weakest are Quality at 0.9, Momentum at 3.4, and Sentiment at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Attractive Valuation Vs Peers
Trip ifStock price falls more than 10% from the current $28.75 level, widening rather than closing the valuation discount.
- P2Quality Floor Breach
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 (back above the engine's minimum floor) for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Breakout Technical Setup
Trip ifStock price falls below its 200-day moving average, a decline of more than 5% from the current $28.75 level.
- P4Elevated Short Interest Risk
Trip ifShort-interest risk score falls below 5.0 from its current 9.9 reading.