Value
10.0/10data confidence 20%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 |
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust is a small closed-end fund with a 7.2% distribution and an attractive valuation versus peers, but it has no earnings data, a 0/9 Piotroski score and quality below the 4.0 floor, so the case rests on income and a pullback within an uptrend.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
BSTZ is attractively valued, with a P/E component of 10.0 out of 10 and a peer value rank of 9.9 out of 10. Valuation breakdown | Value rank versus peers stays above 8 over 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterFund-level P/E is a weak valuation signal, and quality is scored 0.9, so cheapness may reflect missing or unreliable data. | ||
A 7.2% distribution gives income support, with dividend safety scored 5.5 out of 10. Catalyst breakdown | Distribution is maintained at or above the current 7.2% yield over 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterFor a leveraged technology fund, the distribution may be partly return of capital and could be cut if the net asset value falls. | ||
The chart reads as an uptrend pullback with RSI near 32, price above the 200-day average and a 13.2% move to resistance at $30.61. Momentum breakdown | Price rebounds toward $30.61 while holding above the $25.78 stop level. | →Stable |
| CounterFalling OBV shows volume distribution, and the upside is described as exhausted at current levels. | ||
The Piotroski F-Score is 0/9 and the quality score is 0.9, below the 4.0 floor, so there is no fundamental quality support behind the price. Quality breakdown | Quality score rises above 4.0 once fund-level data is populated. | →Stable |
| CounterOperating-company quality tests such as margins and Piotroski do not apply well to a closed-end fund, so the weak score may be an artifact. | ||
CounterFund-level P/E is a weak valuation signal, and quality is scored 0.9, so cheapness may reflect missing or unreliable data.
CounterFor a leveraged technology fund, the distribution may be partly return of capital and could be cut if the net asset value falls.
CounterFalling OBV shows volume distribution, and the upside is described as exhausted at current levels.
CounterOperating-company quality tests such as margins and Piotroski do not apply well to a closed-end fund, so the weak score may be an artifact.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.5 |
| Piotroski F | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 7.9 |
| MACD | 1.2 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 7.9 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.9 |
| quality rank | 5.0 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 8.4 |
| support resistance | 9.4 |
| 52w position | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 4.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.8B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.8B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.8<4.5 outcome against Value at 10.0 and asymmetric R:R of 0.00.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 10.0, Risk (lower is worse) at 8.3, and Technical at 8.2; the weakest are Quality at 0.9, Momentum at 2.8, and Sentiment at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPeer value rank falls below 6 out of 10 from the current 9.9.
Trip ifDistribution yield drops to less than 5% from the current 7.2%.
Trip ifShare price falls below $25.78, the stop level, from the current $27.05.
Trip ifQuality score stays below 1.0 for 2 consecutive refreshes from the current 0.9.