Value
8.5/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.12
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Barnes & Noble Education screens statistically cheap and has staged a bullish golden-cross breakout with a near-miss on the engine's asymmetry bar, but the underlying business quality score sits well below the required floor and the setup faces an earnings report in just two days against a mixed recent track record and elevated implied volatility.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Barnes & Noble Education's business quality score of 2.2 sits well below the engine's minimum floor of 4.0, driven by a lack of competitive moat and broader quality concerns. Warnings | The quality score should climb back above the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months for the stock to clear the minimum quality bar. | — |
| CounterDespite weak quality, the stock has staged a bullish breakout with a golden cross and price above all major moving averages, suggesting the market isn't yet pricing in the quality concerns. | ||
Barnes & Noble Education screens as attractively valued, with a forward P/E near 12.1x and an unusually low PEG ratio of 0.03. Valuation breakdown | The value score should stay elevated and the discount should narrow via price appreciation over the next 12 months. | — |
| CounterThe cheap multiple could reflect real business quality problems — the data flags no competitive moat and broader quality concerns — rather than a straightforward mispricing. | ||
Barnes & Noble Education reports earnings in just 2 days, arriving after a mixed track record — one beat, one miss, and one in-line result over the last three reported quarters with an average surprise near breakeven. Earnings | The company should deliver a positive EPS surprise (above 0%) at this imminent print, breaking the mixed streak. | — |
| CounterImplied volatility is elevated at about 120% ahead of the print, signaling the market is bracing for a large move in either direction, meaning the imminent catalyst carries meaningful two-sided risk. | ||
The stock has staged a bullish breakout — golden cross, price above all major moving averages, RSI near 53, MACD turning positive — but the reward-to-risk ratio of 1.4 falls just short of the engine's 1.5 asymmetry bar. Engine gate (failed) | The reward-to-risk ratio should climb above 1.5 over the next 12 months as either the upside target rises or the downside risk narrows. | — |
| CounterOptions positioning is skewed toward calls rather than puts, a bullish signal that could support the breakout continuing even with the asymmetry ratio currently just under the bar. | ||
CounterDespite weak quality, the stock has staged a bullish breakout with a golden cross and price above all major moving averages, suggesting the market isn't yet pricing in the quality concerns.
CounterThe cheap multiple could reflect real business quality problems — the data flags no competitive moat and broader quality concerns — rather than a straightforward mispricing.
CounterImplied volatility is elevated at about 120% ahead of the print, signaling the market is bracing for a large move in either direction, meaning the imminent catalyst carries meaningful two-sided risk.
CounterOptions positioning is skewed toward calls rather than puts, a bullish signal that could support the breakout continuing even with the asymmetry ratio currently just under the bar.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.0 |
| ROA | 2.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.3 |
| Op margin | 0.6 |
| Net margin | 0.5 |
| Current ratio | 6.1 |
| FCF quality | 9.2 |
| Moat | 3.9 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.2 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 3.2 |
| OBV | 6.8 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.1 |
| erm sentiment | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 4.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.0 |
| quality rank | 1.2 |
| growth rank | 0.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.1 |
| support resistance | 3.6 |
| 52w position | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.6 |
| days to cover | 7.4 |
| volatility | 2.1 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 2.2 |
| max pain risk | 5.0 |
| beta | 5.7 |
| debt equity | 6.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 9.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 50 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.4B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.32>1.3, MCap $0.4B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects clean gate clearance against Value at 8.5 and asymmetric R:R of 1.63.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.5, Sentiment at 7.7, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.7; the weakest are Insider at 3.2, Quality at 3.6, and Peer rank at 4.0. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.63 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifShares decline more than 15% without any re-rating in the multiple, confirming continued de-rating instead of value realization.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0, clearing the engine's minimum floor from the current 2.2 reading.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% (a miss) at the upcoming print in 2 days.
Trip ifReward-to-risk ratio rises above 2.0, moving well past the current 1.4 reading and clearing the engine's asymmetry bar with room to spare.