Value
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.7 |
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.3 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 20.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.09
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Benchmark Electronics is an electronics manufacturing services company with a perfect four-quarter beat streak and excellent cash conversion, but weak momentum, customer concentration and a thin 6.9% gap to the analyst target limit the case.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company beat estimates in all 4 recent quarters (average surprise 7.9%), with EPS up to 0.84 and quarterly revenue of $834M versus $703M a year earlier. Earnings | Beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with quarterly revenue staying above $780M. | ↑Improving |
| CounterBeats of about 8% on low-single-digit margins can be erased by one weak quarter, and EMS demand is cyclical. | ||
Customer and geographic concentration are the main structural risks: the ten largest customers account for 51% of revenue and international operations for 64%. Bear case | Top-ten customer share falls below 50% without losing revenue. | ↑Improving |
| CounterLong-running multi-year EMS contracts and sticky qualification processes lower the practical risk of customer loss. | ||
Cash conversion is excellent at 180% FCF/NI with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, although overall quality is only 4.2 because margins are thin. Quality breakdown | FCF/NI stays above 100% and operating margin improves from the current thin level. | →Stable |
| CounterEMS margins are structurally low and large working-capital swings can reverse FCF quickly. | ||
Momentum is weak at 2.7/10 with falling OBV and a 5.2% gap down, though price is below a long-term average that is still rising at +7.1%/30d, suggesting a pullback in an uptrend. Momentum breakdown | Price reclaims the 200-day average and momentum rises above 4.5. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterDistribution volume and an extreme gap down after good earnings may indicate sellers using strength to exit. | ||
At $68.37 the stock is only 6.9% below the $73.10 analyst target while downside to the stop is 9.8%, a reward-to-risk of 0.7, with a put/call ratio of 1.38. Targets | Analyst targets are raised above $80 or price pulls back toward better entry levels. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst coverage is light, so targets can move quickly higher after strong earnings. | ||
CounterBeats of about 8% on low-single-digit margins can be erased by one weak quarter, and EMS demand is cyclical.
CounterLong-running multi-year EMS contracts and sticky qualification processes lower the practical risk of customer loss.
CounterEMS margins are structurally low and large working-capital swings can reverse FCF quickly.
CounterDistribution volume and an extreme gap down after good earnings may indicate sellers using strength to exit.
CounterAnalyst coverage is light, so targets can move quickly higher after strong earnings.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.7 |
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.3 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.7 |
| ROA | 1.9 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.6 |
| Net margin | 0.9 |
| Current ratio | 6.6 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 7.3 |
| EPS growth | 6.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 6.9 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 0.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.8 |
| Price target | 8.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.9 |
| notable moves | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.8 |
| quality rank | 2.4 |
| growth rank | 4.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 8.6 |
| support resistance | 9.5 |
| 52w position | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.8 |
| days to cover | 7.4 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 4.0 |
| implied vol | 4.5 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 5.4 |
| debt equity | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.5 |
| dividend safety | 6.2 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.41>1.3, MCap $2.5B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Technical at 7.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.6<4.5, ASYMMETRY:1.2<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.16 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Technical at 7.0, Sentiment at 6.9, and Growth at 6.7; the weakest are Momentum at 2.6, Quality at 4.2, and Peer rank at 4.3. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.16 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS misses estimates in more than 1 of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifFCF-to-net-income falls below 80% from the current 180%.
Trip ifTop-ten customer share exceeds 60% of revenue from the current 51%.
Trip ifMomentum score stays below 2.0 and price falls more than 10% from $68.37.
Trip ifReward-to-risk stays below 1.0 as upside to target falls under 3%.