Mexico manufacturing
“10-K Item 1A: 'the majority of our manufacturing output is concentrated at the two manufacturing facilities that we operate in Mexico'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Avanos Medical discloses is Mexico manufacturing, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Avanos Medical’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'the majority of our manufacturing output is concentrated at the two manufacturing facilities that we operate in Mexico'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'for quality assurance or cost effectiveness, we purchase from sole suppliers certain components and raw materials'”
“10-K Item 1: 'In the year ended December 31, 2025, sales to Medline Industries accounted for approximately 12% of consolidated net sales.'”
Avanos Medical's concentration profile centers on manufacturing geography rather than customer mix. The majority of manufacturing output is concentrated at two facilities the company operates in Mexico, a structural exposure that ties production continuity to a single country's operating conditions, logistics, and regulatory environment. That geographic concentration is compounded by a sourcing dependency: for quality assurance or cost effectiveness, the company purchases certain components and raw materials from sole suppliers, meaning a disruption at any one supplier could interrupt production regardless of the Mexico facilities' own performance. By contrast, customer concentration is comparatively contained — sales to Medline Industries accounted for approximately 12% of consolidated net sales in the most recent year, a share that sits at the low end of the disclosed bands. Netting these out, the two structural and dependency exposures around manufacturing footprint and sole-sourced inputs are the more consequential ones for the long-term verdict, since they touch the company's ability to produce and ship at all, while the Medline relationship, though a real customer dependency, represents a comparatively smaller share of revenue that would be easier to absorb if it changed.
For the engine’s reasoning on AVNS’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AORT | Artivion, Inc. | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| AVNS● | Avanos Medical, Inc. | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| ATEC | Alphatec Holdings, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| ABT | Abbott Laboratories | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| AHCO | AdaptHealth Corp. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AXGN | AxoGen, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.