Skip to main content
ASICAtegrity Specialty Insurance CoHold6.1·$24.30
ASIC · Why this verdict

Why Ategrity Specialty Insurance (ASIC) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Ategrity Specialty Insurance is growing quickly (quarterly revenue up about 46% YoY) at a cheap 9.6x forward P/E, but the October 2026 earnings miss, heavy casualty and parent-counterparty concentration, and only 3.7% upside to the analyst target limit the case.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Quarterly revenue reached about $148.5M in the June 2026 quarter versus $101.8M a year earlier, roughly 46% YoY growth.

Tripped↓Deteriorating
Revenue quarters
Expectation
Quarterly revenue should keep growing and stay above $150M within the next 12 months.

CounterGrowth confidence is 0.67 and the next-quarter revenue estimate is reported as 0.0, so forward growth visibility is poor and the pace may slow.

Ategrity beat EPS estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average surprise of 13.0%, but the October 2026 quarter missed by 41.9% (0.29 vs 0.50).

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
EPS should return to meeting or beating estimates at the next report on 2027-02-18.

CounterThe latest miss was large and underwriting results for a young specialty insurer are volatile, so the earlier beat streak may not predict future results.

The stock trades at a forward P/E of 9.6x with a PEG of 0.38, an attractively valued profile with a value score of 8.2/10.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Forward P/E should stay below 12x as earnings grow over the next 12 months.

CounterInsurers often trade at low multiples, and the recent EPS miss suggests forward estimates may be cut, which would raise the true forward multiple.

The business is concentrated, with casualty making up 67.2% of the product mix and Ategrity Limited accounting for 80.0% of the counterparty exposure.

→Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Casualty share should not rise above 67.2% and the counterparty reliance on Ategrity Limited should not exceed 80%.

CounterHeavy casualty exposure can bring reserve deficiencies and adverse development, and dependence on a single counterparty means a disruption there would hit results directly.

Price is only 3.7% below the $24.71 analyst target while downside to the stop is 9.6%, a reward-to-risk of 0.39, and momentum is weak at 3.1/10.

→Stable
Estimated upside
Expectation
Reward-to-risk should improve toward 1.5 on a pullback or a higher analyst target before an entry is attractive.

CounterRSI of 38 marks an uptrend pullback above the 200-day average and the first insider buy has appeared, so the weakness may be a buying opportunity.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

8.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E8.6
P/S8.8
EV/EBITDA7.6
Fwd P/E9.3
PEG10.0
Analyst target5.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 9.6x
  • ▸PEG: 0.38
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

5.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE5.4
ROA3.4
Gross margin1.0
Op margin4.7
Net margin9.4
Current ratio5.4
Moat6.2
Piotroski F6.7
  • ▸Strong margins: 19%

Growth

5.8/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.5
EPS growth7.0

Momentum

4.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD0.0
OBV10.0
MA position4.0
Volume1.5
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating6.5
Price target7.3
erm sentiment5.0
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (5.0) — signal dampened

Insider

5.5/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change6.0
  • ▸Negligible insider buying — $24,290 (0.002% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

6.2/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank3.7
quality rank6.1
growth rank5.4
  • ▸Conservative debt levels

Technical

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger7.0
support resistance7.5
52w position6.8

Risk (lower is worse)

6.1/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.1
days to cover5.6
volatility0.7
debt equity10.0
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg9.0
  • ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:108d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:4.2<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:0.2<1.5@spot
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
0.18
Upside
+1.7%
Downside
9.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRange Bound — RSI 42 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.1B) below institutional reach

SuitabilitySpeculative — Binary industry: Insurance - Property & Casualty

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Value at 8.2; weakest: Momentum at 4.2. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.2, Technical at 7.1, and Catalyst at 6.4; the weakest are Momentum at 4.2, Quality at 5.3, and Insider at 5.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.18 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Fast Premium Revenue GrowthTripped

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue growth falls below 20% YoY from current roughly 46%.

  • P2Earnings Beat Streak Broken

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3Cheap Forward Valuation

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 14x from current 9.6x.

  • P4Casualty And Parent Concentration

    Trip ifAtegrity Limited counterparty share exceeds 90% from current 80%.

  • P5Thin Upside Negative Momentum

    Trip ifReward-to-risk exceeds 1.5 from current 0.39.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › ASIC › Why this verdict