Value
5.0/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.2 |
| P/S | 3.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.6 |
| PEG | 6.3 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 27.1x
- ▸PEG: 1.18
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
argenx is a high-quality biotech with 52% revenue growth, 32% margins, a wide moat and a 9/9 Piotroski score; the main hesitation is a 26.8x forward P/E and a reward-to-risk of 1.33 that has not yet produced a breakout.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The business earns strong margins of 32%, holds a wide economic moat and scores 9/9 on the Piotroski F-Score, with an overall quality score of 9.2. Quality breakdown | Margins stay near 32% and the Piotroski score remains at 8 or higher. | →Stable |
| CounterBiotech moats rest on a few products and patents, and competing drugs could erode margins quickly. | ||
Revenue is growing 52% year over year, with growth scoring a perfect 10.0 out of 10. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth stays above 30% over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterGrowth of this pace is hard to sustain as the base grows, and a deceleration would hit a premium multiple. | ||
The stock trades at a forward P/E of 26.8x with a PEG of 1.20, so expectations for growth are already substantial. Valuation breakdown | Earnings growth catches up so forward P/E falls below 22x at a flat price. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterA PEG of 1.20 for a company growing 52% with 32% margins may still be reasonable versus peers. | ||
Analyst upside is 15.7% against 11.8% downside, a reward-to-risk of 1.33 that is positive but modest for a speculative biotech. Estimated upside | Price pulls back or targets rise so reward-to-risk exceeds 1.5. | →Stable |
| CounterThe analyst upside of 29% before haircut suggests analysts see more room than the conservative target implies. | ||
Price is above the 200-day average with rising OBV volume accumulation, a momentum score of 6.9 and a perfect MACD component. Momentum breakdown | Momentum stays above 5.5 and a breakout above resistance occurs. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe technical setup has not yet produced a breakout above resistance, and the stock sits above max pain of $340, which can pull price lower into expiry. | ||
CounterBiotech moats rest on a few products and patents, and competing drugs could erode margins quickly.
CounterGrowth of this pace is hard to sustain as the base grows, and a deceleration would hit a premium multiple.
CounterA PEG of 1.20 for a company growing 52% with 32% margins may still be reasonable versus peers.
CounterThe analyst upside of 29% before haircut suggests analysts see more room than the conservative target implies.
CounterThe technical setup has not yet produced a breakout above resistance, and the stock sits above max pain of $340, which can pull price lower into expiry.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.2 |
| P/S | 3.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.6 |
| PEG | 6.3 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 8.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Moat | 8.0 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 4.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 8.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.4 |
| quality rank | 7.8 |
| growth rank | 7.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.2 |
| support resistance | 0.1 |
| 52w position | 7.4 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.9 |
| days to cover | 7.4 |
| volatility | 4.9 |
| put call | 6.8 |
| implied vol | 6.1 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| debt equity | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Growth is cheap relative to earnings, but the technical setup has not yet produced a breakout above resistance (PEG 1.18, quality 9.2/10, growth 10.0/10).
L4:PATH_C2_GARP_WAIT|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Binary industry: Biotechnology
The C-path quality+growth combination triggered the STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict: quality 9.2 and growth 10.0 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of 0.72 supporting the read.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Quality at 9.2, and Catalyst at 7.5; the weakest are Technical at 3.2, Insider at 5.0, and Value at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.72 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 25% year over year.
Trip ifNet margin falls below 20% from current 32%.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 35x from current 26.8x.
Trip ifReward-to-risk falls below 1.0 from current 1.33.
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 4.5 from current 6.9.