Value
4.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.9 |
| P/S | 8.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.4 |
| PEG | 9.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 28.0x
- ▸PEG: 0.53
ALNT · Why this verdict
Why Allient (ALNT) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Allient has demonstrated solid earnings execution over most of the recent period and generates significantly more cash than its accounting earnings suggest, but the stock has climbed above the analyst consensus price target into overbought territory with no remaining asymmetry — the setup warrants patience rather than new capital commitment at current levels.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Three of the four quarters in the recent window delivered positive surprises of roughly 20% each; however, the most recent quarterly result came in 6% below consensus, breaking the previously solid pattern and raising the question of whether estimates have finally caught up to the company's earnings power. Earnings | The next reported quarter returns to a positive surprise of at least 5%, demonstrating the most recent miss was isolated rather than the start of a new trend. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThree out of four beats with 20% average upside represents genuinely strong execution discipline; one miss after three large beats may simply reflect normal variance in a small-cap industrial, not a structural change. | ||
Free cash flow is running at 180% of reported net income, meaning the business is generating substantially more cash than accounting earnings reflect — a characteristic that supports balance sheet strength and reduces the risk that profits are illusory. Quality breakdown | FCF conversion stays above 100% of net income over the next four quarters, confirming the structural rather than timing-driven nature of the cash generation. | →Stable |
| CounterA 180% FCF-to-net-income ratio can reflect working capital timing — particularly receivables collection timing or payables extension — rather than a durable structural advantage; if inventory builds or receivables extend, the ratio could normalize sharply. | ||
The stock is trading above the analyst consensus price target, leaving no conventional upside buffer and producing a negative risk/reward at current levels — conditions that historically favor reducing exposure rather than adding. Warnings | Analyst consensus price target is revised upward by more than 15% above current price within the next two quarters, restoring positive asymmetry. | Tripped↑Improving |
| CounterA stock trading above consensus targets can continue to re-rate if fundamentals keep surprising; the target ceiling is a sentiment artifact, and companies with durable earnings momentum routinely trade through analyst estimates before targets are revised. | ||
The RSI has reached 81, a historically overbought reading, while the stock is within 1.7% of its 52-week high — conditions that, combined with the stock already past its price target, raise the probability of near-term consolidation or a mean-reversion pullback. Momentum breakdown | RSI normalizes below 65 over the next quarter while price holds above the prior 52-week high, transforming previous resistance into support. | Tripped↓Deteriorating |
| CounterOverbought momentum conditions can persist for extended periods in strong uptrends; rising on-balance volume alongside the RSI reading supports the bull case that accumulation, not distribution, is occurring. | ||
Three of the four quarters in the recent window delivered positive surprises of roughly 20% each; however, the most recent quarterly result came in 6% below consensus, breaking the previously solid pattern and raising the question of whether estimates have finally caught up to the company's earnings power.
↑ImprovingEarnings
- Expectation
- The next reported quarter returns to a positive surprise of at least 5%, demonstrating the most recent miss was isolated rather than the start of a new trend.
CounterThree out of four beats with 20% average upside represents genuinely strong execution discipline; one miss after three large beats may simply reflect normal variance in a small-cap industrial, not a structural change.
Free cash flow is running at 180% of reported net income, meaning the business is generating substantially more cash than accounting earnings reflect — a characteristic that supports balance sheet strength and reduces the risk that profits are illusory.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- FCF conversion stays above 100% of net income over the next four quarters, confirming the structural rather than timing-driven nature of the cash generation.
CounterA 180% FCF-to-net-income ratio can reflect working capital timing — particularly receivables collection timing or payables extension — rather than a durable structural advantage; if inventory builds or receivables extend, the ratio could normalize sharply.
The stock is trading above the analyst consensus price target, leaving no conventional upside buffer and producing a negative risk/reward at current levels — conditions that historically favor reducing exposure rather than adding.
Tripped↑ImprovingWarnings
- Expectation
- Analyst consensus price target is revised upward by more than 15% above current price within the next two quarters, restoring positive asymmetry.
CounterA stock trading above consensus targets can continue to re-rate if fundamentals keep surprising; the target ceiling is a sentiment artifact, and companies with durable earnings momentum routinely trade through analyst estimates before targets are revised.
The RSI has reached 81, a historically overbought reading, while the stock is within 1.7% of its 52-week high — conditions that, combined with the stock already past its price target, raise the probability of near-term consolidation or a mean-reversion pullback.
Tripped↓DeterioratingMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- RSI normalizes below 65 over the next quarter while price holds above the prior 52-week high, transforming previous resistance into support.
CounterOverbought momentum conditions can persist for extended periods in strong uptrends; rising on-balance volume alongside the RSI reading supports the bull case that accumulation, not distribution, is occurring.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.7 |
| ROA | 3.4 |
| Gross margin | 2.6 |
| Op margin | 2.9 |
| Net margin | 2.1 |
| Current ratio | 9.3 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.5 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 180% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9
Growth
6.8/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.7 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
3.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.0 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Uptrend pullback (RSI 35) - buy opportunity
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
4.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.5 |
| Price target | 2.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (5.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Below analyst target
Insider
5.5/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 8.4 |
| notable moves | 3.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
3.2/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.5 |
| quality rank | 3.8 |
| growth rank | 1.4 |
Technical
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.8 |
| support resistance | 5.9 |
| 52w position | 7.2 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.5 |
| days to cover | 9.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| beta | 4.7 |
| debt equity | 7.1 |
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.8 |
| dividend safety | 6.8 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:15d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:3.0<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-1.9=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-1.95
Upside
-25.7%
Downside
13.2%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 15d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.59>1.3, MCap $1.5B<$5B
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.1 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 6.8) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.0<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-1.9=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.95 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 6.8, Catalyst at 6.7, and Technical at 6.0; the weakest are Momentum at 3.0, Peer rank at 3.2, and Value at 4.8. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.95 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Earnings Execution Recent Miss
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in 2 of the next 3 reported quarters, confirming the miss was not isolated.
- P2Superior Free Cash Flow Conversion
Trip ifFCF as a percentage of net income falls below 100% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Valuation Ceiling Above TargetTripped
Trip ifConsensus analyst price target rises more than 15% above current price within 6 months, restoring positive asymmetry.
- P4Overbought Momentum Near 52w HighTripped
Trip ifPrice advances more than 15% above current levels over the next 60 trading days, demonstrating the overbought reading was not a meaningful ceiling.