Skip to main content
AAgilent Technologies, Inc.Hold5.3·$171.78
A · Why this verdict

Why Agilent Technologies (A) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Agilent is a wide-moat, high-quality diagnostics and research business with strong margins and a 9/9 Piotroski score, but the stock is trading above the analyst target with weak momentum and negative reward-to-risk, limiting near-term upside.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Agilent is a high-quality business with a wide economic moat, strong margins around 20%, and a 9/9 Piotroski F-Score that supports durable returns.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Margins and moat-driven returns should hold, keeping quality score above 7 over the next 12 months.

CounterEarnings quality warning shows only 74% FCF/NI, suggesting reported profits may not fully convert to cash.

Growth scores are modest (revenue growth 4.5, earnings growth 3.7 out of 10) against a forward P/E of 26.0x and PEG of 1.48, so valuation leaves little margin of safety.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Earnings growth should accelerate enough to bring PEG toward or below 1.3 over 12 months.

CounterHealthcare sector tailwinds and a quality premium may sustain a 26x multiple even with modest growth.

The stock has moved above the analyst target of $163.85 (upside_pct -6.3%), leaving limited upside and negative reward-to-risk of -0.95 at the current price of $174.87.

↓Deteriorating
Warnings
Expectation
Analyst targets should be revised up toward the current price, or price consolidates, within 12 months.

CounterWide-moat compounders often justify premium valuations and targets lag price, so analysts may simply raise targets.

Momentum score is 4.3/10 with falling OBV (volume distribution) even though the stock sits only 4.4% from its 52-week high and above the 200-day MA.

↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Momentum score should recover above 4.5 with OBV turning positive if the uptrend is intact.

CounterPrice remains above the 200-day moving average with a 52-week position score of 9.1, so the long-term trend is still constructive.

Insider activity is minimal, with only one sale totaling $95,972 (0.000% of market cap), so insider selling is not a meaningful negative.

→Stable
Insider breakdown
Expectation
Insider selling should remain below 0.1% of market cap with no cluster of sales.

CounterZero insider buying over 90 days and a BEARISH signal show insiders are not adding conviction.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E3.7
P/S5.7
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E4.7
PEG5.1
Analyst target4.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 26.3x
  • ▸PEG: 1.49

Quality

7.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE7.0
ROA5.8
Gross margin6.7
Op margin10.0
Net margin9.8
Current ratio7.1
FCF quality5.6
Moat7.6
Piotroski F10.0
  • ▸Strong margins: 20%
  • ▸Earnings quality warning: 74% FCF/NI
  • ▸Wide economic moat
  • ▸Compounder quality: strong returns + growth

Growth

4.1/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.5
EPS growth3.7

Momentum

3.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position6.0
Volume5.4
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.0
Analyst rating7.5
Price target5.9

Insider

4.0/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change4.0
notable moves3.0
  • ▸Negligible insider selling — $95,972 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

5.2/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.5
quality rank7.8
growth rank3.8

Technical

7.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger7.1
support resistance7.8
52w position8.8

Risk (lower is worse)

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest9.0
days to cover8.9
volatility4.2
put call10.0
implied vol5.5
max pain risk3.0
beta6.1
debt equity7.6
  • ▸Above max pain $70

Catalyst

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg4.3
dividend safety6.8
news activity5.0
  • ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD|L3:NEWS_MOD_NO_UPSIDE
Passed (5)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:18d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:3.6<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.70
Upside
-4.6%
Downside
6.6%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeTemporary headwind — High quality (7.7) with weak momentum (3.6)

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Technical at 7.9; weakest: Momentum at 3.6. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Technical at 7.9, Quality at 7.7, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.8; the weakest are Momentum at 3.6, Insider at 4.0, and Value at 4.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.70 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Wide Moat Quality Compounder

    Trip ifQuality score falls below 7.0 from current 7.7.

  • P2Analyst Target Reached Limited Upside

    Trip ifReward-to-risk ratio stays below -1.5 as price rises more than 15% above the analyst target.

  • P3Fading Momentum Near High

    Trip ifMomentum score falls below 3.0 from current 4.3.

  • P4Modest Growth Fair Valuation

    Trip ifPEG ratio exceeds 2.0 from current 1.48.

  • P5Negligible Insider Pressure

    Trip ifInsider selling exceeds 0.1% of market cap in 90 days.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › A › Why this verdict