top five channel partners
“10-K Item 1A: 'sales through our top five channel partners and their affiliates, in aggregate, represented 28% of our revenue for fiscal 2025'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Zscaler discloses is top five channel partners at 28%, classified MEDIUM by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Zscaler’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'sales through our top five channel partners and their affiliates, in aggregate, represented 28% of our revenue for fiscal 2025'”
The company's disclosed concentration profile is narrow, anchored by a single channel-partner dependency: sales through the top five channel partners and their affiliates, in aggregate, represented 28% of revenue for fiscal 2025, a moderate share by disclosed size. This is a go-to-market structural feature rather than an end-customer dependency. The company sells primarily through indirect channels, meaning this concentration reflects the distribution intermediaries rather than the underlying enterprise buyers, which are typically large organizations distributed broadly across sectors and geographies. The dependency character of the exposure reflects the fact that a meaningful reallocation of business by these channel partners — or a deterioration in the working relationships — could affect the company's ability to source and close deals efficiently. The filing does not disclose any named geographic, supplier, or product concentration beyond this channel-level exposure. The absence of individual named partners in the cited disclosure further limits the ability to assess single-name risk within the cohort, but also suggests no individual partner relationship approaches a threshold that would create acute dependency on its own. On balance, the disclosed concentration profile is contained: the top-five channel partner relationship is the primary variable to monitor, and the structural nature of indirect distribution in enterprise software means this level of intermediary concentration is a common feature of the sector rather than an anomalous risk.
For the engine’s reasoning on ZS’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APPN | Appian Corporation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| AVPT | AvePoint, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| ATEN | A10 Networks, Inc. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| ZS● | Zscaler, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| ACIW | ACI Worldwide, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AKAM | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.