Skip to main content
WATWaters CorporationHold5.7·$369.18+3.35%
WAT · Why this verdict

Why Waters (WAT) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Waters Corporation has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters and posted exceptional revenue growth of 91% year-over-year, but negative price momentum with a falling on-balance-volume and a cash flow red flag — free cash flow was -112% of net income — create meaningful fundamental concerns.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Waters has beaten EPS consensus in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 5.8%, while reporting 91% year-over-year revenue growth that makes it the top growth performer in its industry peer group.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Earnings beat streak extends to 6 consecutive quarters and revenue growth remains above 20% year-over-year for at least 2 more quarters.

CounterRevenue growth of 91% likely reflects an acquisition or a post-disruption recovery base effect rather than organic expansion; the underlying growth rate may be far lower and may normalize sharply.

Free cash flow was -112% of net income, meaning Waters is reporting positive net income but consuming more cash than it earns, which is a significant quality concern flagged as an earnings quality red flag in the data.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow improves to at least 50% of net income on a trailing 12-month basis within the next 2 annual reporting cycles.

CounterNegative FCF relative to net income can reflect heavy capital investment in growth capacity that will generate returns over time; the strong Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 suggests the balance sheet remains solid.

On-balance-volume is declining and the MACD has turned bearish, indicating selling pressure from institutional holders even as price holds above the 200-day moving average, which is a classic divergence that often precedes a price correction.

Stable
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
On-balance-volume trend reverses to rising within 6 months and MACD returns to positive territory.

CounterPrice is above the 200-day moving average and RSI at 59 is not in oversold territory, suggesting the selling pressure is modest and may represent normal profit-taking after a strong run.

A put/call ratio of 1.33 indicates that options market participants are positioned defensively, buying more protection against downside than upside exposure, which is unusual for a stock with a strong earnings beat streak.

Stable
Options
Expectation
Put/call ratio falls below 0.8 within 12 months, reflecting improved options market sentiment as fundamental concerns are resolved.

CounterElevated put/call ratios can reflect hedging by long holders rather than directional bearish bets; many institutional positions are routinely hedged regardless of conviction level.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

3.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E2.7
P/S3.9
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E5.9
PEG4.9
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 21.7x
  • PEG: 1.59

Quality

4.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE1.7
ROA2.2
Gross margin7.0
Op margin1.1
Net margin6.0
Current ratio6.4
FCF quality0.0
Moat7.1
Piotroski F8.9
  • Earnings quality RED FLAG: -112% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

10.0/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth10.0
  • Strong growth: 91% YoY

Momentum

3.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position9.0
Volume2.7
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.5
Price target6.2
erm sentiment4.9

Insider

6.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change6.9
notable moves7.0
  • No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.5
quality rank5.1
growth rank9.6
  • Industry growth leader

Technical

5.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger3.9
support resistance3.5
52w position7.8
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.7
days to cover7.0
volatility4.5
put call0.0
implied vol6.4
max pain risk3.0
beta6.2
debt equity8.5
  • Elevated put/call: 3.33
  • Above max pain $250

Catalyst

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg5.4
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Mixed signals. Hold existing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD_DEFAULT
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:35d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:3.6<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.3=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.30
Upside
-2.4%
Downside
8.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRANGE_BOUND RSI 42 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The default F-path HOLD fired without any positive-conviction gate triggering — no momentum acceleration, no quality+value crossover, no setup recognition. Highest-clear gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Growth at 10.0; weakest: Momentum at 3.6. The engine's read is one of pattern absence — no directional conviction in either direction at current asymmetry.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Sentiment at 6.4, and Insider at 6.3; the weakest are Momentum at 3.6, Value at 3.8, and Peer rank at 4.3. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.30 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Waters has beaten EPS consensus in all 4 of the last 4 quarters with an average positive surprise of 5.8%, while reporting 91% year-over-year revenue growth that makes it the top growth performer in its industry peer group.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, breaking the perfect beat streak.

  • P2Free cash flow was -112% of net income, meaning Waters is reporting positive net income but consuming more cash than it earns, which is a significant quality concern flagged as an earnings quality red flag in the data.

    Trip ifFree cash flow remains negative relative to net income for more than 2 consecutive annual periods.

  • P3On-balance-volume is declining and the MACD has turned bearish, indicating selling pressure from institutional holders even as price holds above the 200-day moving average, which is a classic divergence that often precedes a price correction.

    Trip ifPrice drops below the 200-day moving average and falls more than 10% below the current $357.76.

  • P4A put/call ratio of 1.33 indicates that options market participants are positioned defensively, buying more protection against downside than upside exposure, which is unusual for a stock with a strong earnings beat streak.

    Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 2.0, more than 50% above the current 1.33, indicating increasing protective positioning.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks WAT Why this verdict