Value
5.8/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 3.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.2 |
| PEG | 4.9 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 17.4x
- ▸PEG: 1.64
VNOM · Why this verdict
Why Viper Energy (VNOM) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Viper Energy delivered 109% year-over-year revenue growth and has beaten earnings in 3 of the last 4 quarters, with analyst consensus implying 33% upside from current levels, but the stock faces negative price momentum, heavy Permian Basin geographic concentration, and free cash flow burning at 66% of revenue.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Year-over-year revenue growth of 109% — the top score in its dimension — combined with a Rule of 40 score of 43 reflects rapid expansion in mineral royalty income driven by Permian Basin activity. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth stays above 30% year-over-year in at least 3 of the next 4 reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterTriple-digit revenue growth in energy royalties is often cyclical and driven by oil price levels rather than volume gains; a commodity downturn could sharply reduce headline growth without any operational change. | ||
All mineral royalty income is derived from the Permian Basin and specifically the Wolfberry resource play in the Midland Basin, creating geographic and geological concentration risk that could be amplified by any regional regulatory, infrastructure, or geological disruption. Bear case | Permian Basin revenue sources diversify so that no single sub-basin contributes more than 60% of royalty income within 24 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe Permian Basin is the highest-quality, lowest-cost oil production region in the United States; concentration in the best basin is a deliberate strategic choice that maximizes returns per royalty acre. | ||
Three of the four most recent quarters produced earnings at or above analyst estimates, with positive surprises in each reported beat quarter, demonstrating reliable execution against consensus within the royalty income model. Earnings | Earnings surprise stays positive in at least 3 of the next 4 reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterBeat margins have been narrow at 2-6% per quarter; the February 2026 quarter technically showed inline performance at minus 1%, making the streak less compelling than a dominant beat pattern. | ||
With RSI pulling back to 39 and falling on-balance volume confirming distribution pressure, the stock is experiencing near-term price weakness that has reduced the technical score to 3.2, below the minimum momentum threshold. Momentum breakdown | RSI recovers above 50 and on-balance volume turns upward within the next 3 months, resolving the current pullback. | →Stable |
| CounterRSI at 39 in a quality royalty company with 109% revenue growth and analyst upside of 33% may represent a genuine buying opportunity rather than the start of a sustained downtrend. | ||
Year-over-year revenue growth of 109% — the top score in its dimension — combined with a Rule of 40 score of 43 reflects rapid expansion in mineral royalty income driven by Permian Basin activity.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth stays above 30% year-over-year in at least 3 of the next 4 reported quarters.
CounterTriple-digit revenue growth in energy royalties is often cyclical and driven by oil price levels rather than volume gains; a commodity downturn could sharply reduce headline growth without any operational change.
All mineral royalty income is derived from the Permian Basin and specifically the Wolfberry resource play in the Midland Basin, creating geographic and geological concentration risk that could be amplified by any regional regulatory, infrastructure, or geological disruption.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Permian Basin revenue sources diversify so that no single sub-basin contributes more than 60% of royalty income within 24 months.
CounterThe Permian Basin is the highest-quality, lowest-cost oil production region in the United States; concentration in the best basin is a deliberate strategic choice that maximizes returns per royalty acre.
Three of the four most recent quarters produced earnings at or above analyst estimates, with positive surprises in each reported beat quarter, demonstrating reliable execution against consensus within the royalty income model.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Earnings surprise stays positive in at least 3 of the next 4 reported quarters.
CounterBeat margins have been narrow at 2-6% per quarter; the February 2026 quarter technically showed inline performance at minus 1%, making the streak less compelling than a dominant beat pattern.
With RSI pulling back to 39 and falling on-balance volume confirming distribution pressure, the stock is experiencing near-term price weakness that has reduced the technical score to 3.2, below the minimum momentum threshold.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- RSI recovers above 50 and on-balance volume turns upward within the next 3 months, resolving the current pullback.
CounterRSI at 39 in a quality royalty company with 109% revenue growth and analyst upside of 33% may represent a genuine buying opportunity rather than the start of a sustained downtrend.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 3.4 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 6.8 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 7.2 |
| Rule of 40 | 7.3 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Cash-burning: FCF -66% of revenue
- ▸Rule of 40: 43 (pass)
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
5.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 109% YoY
Momentum
4.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.1 |
| MACD | 2.4 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Oversold in uptrend (RSI 28)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.8 |
| erm sentiment | 4.6 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 34%
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.7 |
| quality rank | 0.2 |
| growth rank | 9.3 |
- ▸Industry growth leader
Technical
7.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.5 |
| support resistance | 8.0 |
| 52w position | 7.2 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.9 |
| days to cover | 5.3 |
| volatility | 6.1 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 7.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 9.4 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 9.40
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 3.8 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (8)
- MOMENTUM:4.9>=4.5
- ASYMMETRY:4.0>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:39d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (1)
- MOMENTUM:4.9<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
3.98
Upside
+20.5%
Downside
5.1%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.4 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Technical at 7.6) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Current asymmetry R:R is 3.98 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Technical at 7.6, Risk (lower is worse) at 6.5, and Sentiment at 6.1; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.8, Momentum at 4.9, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.98 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Year-over-year revenue growth of 109% — the top score in its dimension — combined with a Rule of 40 score of 43 reflects rapid expansion in mineral royalty income driven by Permian Basin activity.
Trip ifRevenue growth rate falls below 15% year-over-year in any of the next 4 reported quarters.
- P2Three of the four most recent quarters produced earnings at or above analyst estimates, with positive surprises in each reported beat quarter, demonstrating reliable execution against consensus within the royalty income model.
Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.
- P3All mineral royalty income is derived from the Permian Basin and specifically the Wolfberry resource play in the Midland Basin, creating geographic and geological concentration risk that could be amplified by any regional regulatory, infrastructure, or geological disruption.
Trip ifRoyalty income from any single sub-basin declines by more than 20% quarter-over-quarter, signaling a localized disruption.
- P4With RSI pulling back to 39 and falling on-balance volume confirming distribution pressure, the stock is experiencing near-term price weakness that has reduced the technical score to 3.2, below the minimum momentum threshold.
Trip ifRSI falls below 30 and remains below 30 for more than 15 consecutive trading days, indicating oversold deterioration.