Value
6.2/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 3.0 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.0 |
| PEG | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.1x
- ▸PEG: 4.10
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Universal Corporation converts free cash flow at 200% of net income and carries a Piotroski financial strength score of 8 out of 9, but 3 consecutive earnings misses with a devastating average surprise of -46%, an extremely elevated put-to-call ratio of 28, and weak overall growth make this a fragile position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Universal Corporation converts 200% of net income into free cash flow, signaling that the business generates substantially more actual cash than reported earnings suggest, supporting the thesis that the stock's true earnings power is higher than headline numbers indicate. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow conversion should remain above 150% of net income over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe net margin is less than 1% despite the high free cash flow conversion ratio, meaning the absolute dollar amount of free cash flow is very small, limiting the practical financial benefit of the conversion premium. | ||
Analysts place a consensus price target implying 39% upside from the current $53.33, suggesting the market may be undervaluing the leaf tobacco supply chain business on an asset or cash flow basis despite weak reported earnings. Sentiment breakdown | The price should rise above $60 within 12 months, capturing at least 40% of the implied analyst upside. | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue growth is minimal and the PEG ratio of 4.13 indicates the stock is not inexpensive relative to growth, and the dividend is flagged as unsafe relative to its payout level, reducing the yield-as-a-floor argument. | ||
Universal Corporation missed earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average negative surprise of -46%, including a recent quarter where actual results were -142.6% below expectations, indicating a severe deterioration in near-term earnings predictability. Earnings | EPS surprise should improve to above -10% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters as the business cycle stabilizes. | →Stable |
| CounterLeaf tobacco processing companies experience significant quarterly earnings volatility due to crop timing and export shipment patterns, and a single-quarter miss can disproportionately distort the average. | ||
A put-to-call ratio of 28.00 is among the highest observed across the screened universe, reflecting extreme bearish or hedging positioning in the options market that signals elevated downside risk uncertainty. Key risks | The put-to-call ratio should decline below 10 within 12 months as fundamental clarity improves and hedging unwinds. | →Stable |
| CounterIn very thinly traded options markets for small-cap tobacco distributors, a ratio this extreme often reflects a single large institutional hedge rather than a broad bearish consensus, and may not carry predictive weight. | ||
CounterThe net margin is less than 1% despite the high free cash flow conversion ratio, meaning the absolute dollar amount of free cash flow is very small, limiting the practical financial benefit of the conversion premium.
CounterRevenue growth is minimal and the PEG ratio of 4.13 indicates the stock is not inexpensive relative to growth, and the dividend is flagged as unsafe relative to its payout level, reducing the yield-as-a-floor argument.
CounterLeaf tobacco processing companies experience significant quarterly earnings volatility due to crop timing and export shipment patterns, and a single-quarter miss can disproportionately distort the average.
CounterIn very thinly traded options markets for small-cap tobacco distributors, a ratio this extreme often reflects a single large institutional hedge rather than a broad bearish consensus, and may not carry predictive weight.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 3.0 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.0 |
| PEG | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.3 |
| ROA | 3.1 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.5 |
| Net margin | 0.6 |
| Current ratio | 9.5 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.5 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 2.5 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.2 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 1.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.0 |
| support resistance | 3.6 |
| 52w position | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.0 |
| days to cover | 2.3 |
| volatility | 7.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 5.3 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 9.6 |
| debt equity | 7.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.8 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupRANGE_BOUND — RSI 51 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $1.3B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.7 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Sentiment at 6.8) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Current asymmetry R:R is 2.56 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 6.8, Value at 6.2, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.2; the weakest are Catalyst at 2.5, Peer rank at 2.7, and Growth at 2.9. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.56 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 100% of net income in any of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -50% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifPut-to-call ratio rises above 35, exceeding the current 28 level.
Trip ifPrice drops below $49.69, more than 6.8% below the current $53.33.