Value
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.0 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 6.0x
- ▸PEG: 0.34
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Stagwell trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 5.6x with excellent free cash flow conversion of 1000% of net income, but the business fails the quality minimum threshold, carries a put-to-call ratio of 7.33, a short interest of 11%, and the asymmetry ratio of 0.91 is below the threshold needed to justify a new position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Stagwell's quality score of 3.6 falls below the minimum threshold of 4.0, reflecting weak operating margins, low gross margin relative to peers, and limited competitive moat in a fragmented advertising market. Warnings | Quality score improves above 4.5 within 4 quarters as operating leverage on revenue growth translates to higher margins, removing the quality-floor flag. | →Stable |
| CounterAdvertising agencies face structural margin pressure from technology-enabled competition and client consolidation; improving quality metrics to above the threshold may require sustained revenue growth that has not yet materialized. | ||
Stagwell converts approximately 1000% of net income into free cash flow, indicating that GAAP net income is dramatically understating the actual cash generation of the business due to large non-cash charges. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow conversion remains above 500% of net income for the next 4 quarters, confirming that the structural cash generation advantage is durable. | →Stable |
| CounterExtremely high free cash flow relative to net income in advertising agencies typically reflects large amortization of acquired intangibles from acquisitions; the cash economic advantage may be offset by the associated debt from those acquisitions. | ||
Short interest of 11% of the float and a put-to-call ratio of 7.33 indicate that a significant portion of the market is actively positioned against Stagwell, creating meaningful supply and sentiment pressure on the stock. Key risks | Short interest falls below 7% over 12 months as earnings progress reduces bearish conviction, and the put-to-call ratio falls below 3.0. | →Stable |
| CounterElevated short interest in small-cap advertising agencies often reflects well-founded concerns about organic growth rates and leverage sustainability; the bearish positioning may be rational rather than contrarian opportunity. | ||
A forward price-to-earnings ratio of 5.6x and a PEG ratio of 0.32 suggest that analysts expect earnings to grow faster than the current multiple implies, providing a valuation cushion if execution improves. Valuation breakdown | The forward price-to-earnings multiple expands to above 8x within 12 months as earnings confidence increases, implying more than 40% upside from current levels. | →Stable |
| CounterCheap multiples for quality-challenged companies in declining secular industries often remain cheap; the advertising agency sector faces ongoing budget share loss to in-house agency and platform-direct spending. | ||
CounterAdvertising agencies face structural margin pressure from technology-enabled competition and client consolidation; improving quality metrics to above the threshold may require sustained revenue growth that has not yet materialized.
CounterExtremely high free cash flow relative to net income in advertising agencies typically reflects large amortization of acquired intangibles from acquisitions; the cash economic advantage may be offset by the associated debt from those acquisitions.
CounterElevated short interest in small-cap advertising agencies often reflects well-founded concerns about organic growth rates and leverage sustainability; the bearish positioning may be rational rather than contrarian opportunity.
CounterCheap multiples for quality-challenged companies in declining secular industries often remain cheap; the advertising agency sector faces ongoing budget share loss to in-house agency and platform-direct spending.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.0 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.0 |
| ROA | 1.5 |
| Gross margin | 3.2 |
| Op margin | 1.1 |
| Net margin | 0.3 |
| Current ratio | 3.3 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 7.3 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 8.5 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 2.0 |
| insider conviction | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.9 |
| quality rank | 3.8 |
| growth rank | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.4 |
| support resistance | 3.2 |
| 52w position | 8.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.7 |
| days to cover | 4.4 |
| volatility | 2.8 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 6.0 |
| debt equity | 2.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.5 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupBREAKOUT — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 62, MACD bullish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $1.8B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:0.1<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.0, Sentiment at 6.8, and Momentum at 6.3; the weakest are Risk (lower is worse) at 3.0, Quality at 3.6, and Peer rank at 4.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.12 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 200% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters, declining more than 800 percentage points from the current 1000% level.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 15% of float, more than 36% above the current 11%, indicating bearish positioning is intensifying.
Trip ifQuality score remains below 4.0 for 6 or more consecutive months, indicating the quality-floor issue is structural rather than transitional.
Trip ifStock price drops below $5.80, more than 12% below the current $6.59, on negative revenue growth or analyst downgrade to below $6 target.