Skip to main content
SNASnap-On IncorporatedSell5.2·$396.31+1.06%
SNA · Why this verdict

Why Snap-On (SNA) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Snap-on is a high-quality industrial tools business with a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, wide economic moat, and 20% operating margins, but the stock has surpassed analyst price targets with negative asymmetry, making the business quality case attractive while the current price offers no margin of safety.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Snap-on earns a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, a quality score of 8.1/10, and wide economic moat designation, reflecting exceptional balance sheet strength, earnings quality, and durable competitive positioning in professional tools.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
The company maintains its Piotroski F-Score above 8 over the next 12 months, confirming the business quality is not deteriorating.

CounterGeographic concentration risk in the United States, flagged as a high-risk concentration factor, means any domestic slowdown in auto repair or industrial activity would disproportionately impact results.

Snap-on has beaten or met earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, with an average positive surprise of 2.3% and a most recent quarter beat by 8.1%, demonstrating steady execution in a mature industrial business.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The company delivers at least 2 more earnings beats over the next 4 quarters, with positive average surprises above 1%.

CounterThe most recent quarter was a miss at -1.24%, and the growth profile is modest with revenue growing at a low single-digit pace, suggesting limited earnings upside.

The stock has formed a golden cross pattern with bullish MACD and is trading above all major moving averages with RSI at 65, suggesting institutional buying support for the breakout thesis.

Stable
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price sustains above the 200-day moving average for at least 9 of the next 12 months as the breakout pattern holds.

CounterDespite the golden cross, on-balance volume is falling, indicating that trading volume is not confirming the price strength — distribution may be occurring at these elevated levels.

The stock has exceeded analyst price targets by 11.5%, meaning the upside is now negative at current prices relative to consensus fair value — making any new position dependent on analysts upgrading their estimates.

Stable
Warnings
Expectation
Analyst consensus price target rises above $430, restoring at least 10% upside from the current price of $386, within 12 months.

CounterStrong business quality and a breakout momentum pattern can sustain prices above analyst targets for extended periods if earnings estimates continue to rise.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E6.4
P/S7.7
EV/EBITDA3.4
Fwd P/E6.9
PEG4.3
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 18.4x
  • PEG: 2.19

Quality

8.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE6.1
ROA6.6
Gross margin6.3
Op margin9.8
Net margin9.8
Current ratio9.5
FCF quality7.1
Moat7.8
Piotroski F10.0
  • Strong margins: 20%
  • Wide economic moat
  • Compounder quality: strong returns + growth
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

3.3/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.8
EPS growth2.8

Momentum

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target4.9
erm sentiment5.4

Insider

3.9/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction2.0
holder change5.1
  • Modest insider selling — $13,191,969 (0.065% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.8/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank4.4
quality rank7.5
growth rank2.5
  • Best-in-class margins

Technical

3.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.4
support resistance0.5
52w position9.9

Risk (lower is worse)

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.1
days to cover0.0
volatility7.1
put call1.1
implied vol7.0
max pain risk3.0
beta8.6
debt equity9.1
  • Elevated put/call: 1.83
  • Above max pain $290
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg3.7
dividend safety5.5
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • Dividend: 249.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:6.8>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:20d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-1.62
Upside
-13.8%
Downside
8.5%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBREAKOUT Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 64, MACD bullish

EdgeCATALYST Earnings in 20d with 3/4 beat streak

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 8.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.62 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 8.1, Momentum at 6.8, and Value at 5.2; the weakest are Growth at 3.3, Technical at 3.6, and Insider at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.62 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Snap-on earns a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, a quality score of 8.1/10, and wide economic moat designation, reflecting exceptional balance sheet strength, earnings quality, and durable competitive positioning in professional tools.

    Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 7 in any reported period or operating margin drops below 15%, indicating quality deterioration.

  • P2Snap-on has beaten or met earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, with an average positive surprise of 2.3% and a most recent quarter beat by 8.1%, demonstrating steady execution in a mature industrial business.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, indicating the modest beat streak has reversed into a miss pattern.

  • P3The stock has formed a golden cross pattern with bullish MACD and is trading above all major moving averages with RSI at 65, suggesting institutional buying support for the breakout thesis.

    Trip ifPrice drops below $350, more than 9% below the current $386, confirming the golden cross breakout has failed.

  • P4The stock has exceeded analyst price targets by 11.5%, meaning the upside is now negative at current prices relative to consensus fair value — making any new position dependent on analysts upgrading their estimates.

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $440, restoring at least 12% upside from current levels above $386.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks SNA Why this verdict