Value
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.8 |
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.0 |
| PEG | 3.7 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 15.0x
- ▸PEG: 3.07
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Sunrun is a residential solar company with 43% year-over-year revenue growth and dramatic earnings beats in 3 of the last 4 quarters, but critical quality weaknesses including a Piotroski score of just 3 out of 9, free cash flow deeply negative at negative 395% of net income, and 30% short interest reflect genuine financial fragility beneath the growth surface.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Revenue grew 43% year over year, and the company beat earnings estimates by more than 700% in the most recent quarter and more than 1,200% in the quarter before that, reflecting substantial outperformance relative to very low expectations. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth rate remains above 25% year over year over the next 12 months, and earnings per share beats consensus estimates in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterEnormous percentage beats against near-zero EPS estimates in solar are commonly driven by accounting treatment of installation capitalization rather than underlying demand strength; the massive surprise percentages obscure that the absolute earnings numbers are very small. | ||
Free cash flow is deeply negative at negative 395% of net income, meaning the company is consuming cash at a rate nearly four times its reported earnings, which requires continuous external financing to sustain operations and growth. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow deficit relative to net income narrows to less than negative 200% within 12 months, indicating improved capital efficiency in the installation business. | →Stable |
| CounterResidential solar companies have structurally negative free cash flow during growth phases due to upfront installation costs; the key question is whether the contracted cash flows from long-term customer agreements offset the upfront capital intensity. | ||
Short interest of 30% of float is the highest in this group and is explicitly flagged as justified by quality metrics, along with a put-to-call ratio of 2.45 and high implied volatility of 93%, indicating deep skepticism about the company's financial viability. Risk breakdown | Short interest falls below 20% within 12 months as the company demonstrates improvement in cash flow and reduces reliance on external financing. | →Stable |
| Counter30% short interest with a justified quality flag in a negative free cash flow company may accurately reflect structural insolvency risk if interest rates rise, reducing the value of long-term contracted solar revenue streams. | ||
Analysts maintain targets implying 54% upside from the current price of $12.47, while the stock sits in a technically weak position with a death cross pattern and price near 52-week lows, creating a large gap between what analysts expect and what the market currently prices. Sentiment breakdown | Price rises above $18, more than 44% above the current $12.47, within 12 months as execution on the growth narrative reduces the discount to analyst targets. | →Stable |
| CounterA death cross with price near 52-week lows in a capital-intensive growth company often precedes continued downside; the analyst upside may require multiple years to materialize rather than 12 months, assuming the company can finance itself through the interim period. | ||
CounterEnormous percentage beats against near-zero EPS estimates in solar are commonly driven by accounting treatment of installation capitalization rather than underlying demand strength; the massive surprise percentages obscure that the absolute earnings numbers are very small.
CounterResidential solar companies have structurally negative free cash flow during growth phases due to upfront installation costs; the key question is whether the contracted cash flows from long-term customer agreements offset the upfront capital intensity.
Counter30% short interest with a justified quality flag in a negative free cash flow company may accurately reflect structural insolvency risk if interest rates rise, reducing the value of long-term contracted solar revenue streams.
CounterA death cross with price near 52-week lows in a capital-intensive growth company often precedes continued downside; the analyst upside may require multiple years to materialize rather than 12 months, assuming the company can finance itself through the interim period.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.8 |
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.0 |
| PEG | 3.7 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 2.4 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 8.9 |
| Current ratio | 5.3 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.2 |
| Piotroski F | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.7 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.2 |
| Volume | 10.0 |
| vol acceleration | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.0 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 8.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.3 |
| quality rank | 4.4 |
| growth rank | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.0 |
| support resistance | 4.7 |
| 52w position | 2.9 |
| gap | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 0.5 |
| days to cover | 3.5 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 7.5 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 2.3 |
| debt equity | 2.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRECOVERY — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 47
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 2.30>1.3, MCap $3.1B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:1.3<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Momentum at 8.1, and Sentiment at 7.4; the weakest are Risk (lower is worse) at 2.4, Quality at 2.7, and Insider at 3.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.28 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth rate falls below 15% year over year for at least 2 consecutive quarters, indicating a more than 60% deceleration from the current 43% pace.
Trip ifFree cash flow deficit as a percentage of net income worsens beyond negative 500%, indicating accelerating cash consumption relative to earnings.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 35% of float, more than 5 percentage points above the current 30%, indicating increased conviction in the bear case.
Trip ifPrice falls below $9, more than 28% below the current $12.47, setting a new 52-week low and indicating the analyst upside thesis is losing market credibility.