private E&P company
“10-K Item 1A: 'One of our customers, a private E&P company, accounted for approximately 15% of the Company's revenues in 2025 and 13% of the Company's revenues in 2024.'”
Updated
The most significant concentration RPC discloses is private E&P company at 15%, classified LOW by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: RPC’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'One of our customers, a private E&P company, accounted for approximately 15% of the Company's revenues in 2025 and 13% of the Company's revenues in 2024.'”
The company's disclosed concentration profile is narrow, centering on a single customer dependency: one private exploration and production company accounted for approximately 15% of the company's revenues in 2025 and 13% of revenues in 2024. By disclosed size this is a small-share exposure, and its character is dependency — a single private-sector counterparty whose spending decisions on oilfield services directly influence a limited but identifiable portion of the revenue base. The increasing share from 13% to 15% year over year suggests the relationship has deepened, which modestly elevates the dependency. At the same time, a small-share concentration means the loss of this customer, while noticeable, would not be catastrophic in isolation — the remaining revenue base is substantially diversified across other E&P operators. The customer is private rather than publicly reported, which limits the ability to independently monitor its financial health or drilling activity in real time. For an oilfield services company, individual customer concentration at this level is common across the sector, driven by the concentrated nature of large E&P budgets. There are no geographic, supplier, or product concentrations disclosed alongside this. On balance, this is a background monitoring item — worth tracking for any changes in the relationship or in the customer's drilling activity, but not a dominant variable in the investment thesis given the small-share band and diversified remainder of the book.
For the engine’s reasoning on RES’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AROC | Archrock, Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| AESI | Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| FLOC | Flowco Holdings Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| FTI | TechnipFMC plc | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| RES● | RPC, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| BKR | Baker Hughes Company | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.