Value
9.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Quantum Computing Inc. is a pre-profitability hardware company burning cash at a rate of -931% of revenue, with a quality score of 2.1 out of 10 and a confirmed death cross, but strong analyst upside consensus of 65%, 3 consecutive earnings beats, and volume accumulation signal speculative positioning ahead of potential commercial progress.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company's free cash flow is -931% of revenue, meaning for every dollar of revenue generated, it spends nearly ten dollars of cash, placing the company in an extremely high-risk financial position that requires sustained access to external capital to survive. Quality breakdown | Cash burn rate improves to below -500% of revenue within 12 months as commercial contracts are secured. | →Stable |
| CounterEarly-stage quantum computing hardware companies require heavy upfront capital for development and manufacturing; a high burn rate relative to minimal current revenue is expected and does not necessarily predict failure. | ||
The stock is in a confirmed death cross with the 50-day moving average below the 200-day moving average and a -6.4% slope over 30 days, a technically confirmed downtrend that blocks entry until the pattern resolves. Warnings | The death cross resolves within 6 months with a golden cross forming as price stabilizes above the 200-day moving average. | →Stable |
| CounterOn-balance volume is rising despite the downtrend, indicating that buying interest is accumulating below the surface and a reversal may be closer than the price chart suggests. | ||
With 30% of the float sold short and an elevated put/call ratio of 1.57, the market is heavily positioned against the stock; any positive commercial announcement could trigger a sharp short-covering rally toward the analyst target of $15.95. Key risks | Short interest falls below 20% following a positive commercial or partnership announcement. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh short interest in loss-making technology companies reflects informed skepticism about viability, and the 30% short ratio has persisted through multiple quarters without triggering a sustained recovery. | ||
The company has beaten earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average surprise of 83.6%, including a 239% beat in November 2025, suggesting management is setting conservative guidance and consistently exceeding it even in a cash-burning stage. Earnings | Earnings beats continue in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters with average positive surprise above 20%. | →Stable |
| CounterEarnings beats in pre-revenue companies often reflect expense management or accounting timing rather than commercial progress, and the 83.6% average beat may compress as analyst estimates become more precise. | ||
CounterEarly-stage quantum computing hardware companies require heavy upfront capital for development and manufacturing; a high burn rate relative to minimal current revenue is expected and does not necessarily predict failure.
CounterOn-balance volume is rising despite the downtrend, indicating that buying interest is accumulating below the surface and a reversal may be closer than the price chart suggests.
CounterHigh short interest in loss-making technology companies reflects informed skepticism about viability, and the 30% short ratio has persisted through multiple quarters without triggering a sustained recovery.
CounterEarnings beats in pre-revenue companies often reflect expense management or accounting timing rather than commercial progress, and the 83.6% average beat may compress as analyst estimates become more precise.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 1.3 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 7.3 |
| Analyst rating | 6.6 |
| Price target | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.0 |
| quality rank | 2.0 |
| growth rank | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.9 |
| support resistance | 8.9 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| gap | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 0.5 |
| days to cover | 8.9 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 7.3 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 8.6 |
| news risk | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupFALLING_KNIFE — Death cross, below all MAs, RSI 39, MACD bearish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 3.74>1.3, MCap $2.2B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:1.4<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.0, Sentiment at 7.8, and Catalyst at 7.6; the weakest are Momentum at 1.4, Quality at 2.1, and Risk (lower is worse) at 3.8. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 4.53 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifCash burn rate worsens beyond -1200% of revenue in any reported period.
Trip ifThe 200-day moving average slope declines beyond -10% over any 30-day window.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 40% of the float.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -50% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.