Utility and Power customers
“10-K Item 1: 'Utility and Power| | 70 | %'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Quanta Services discloses is Utility and Power customers at 70%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Quanta Services’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Utility and Power| | 70 | %'”
“10-K Item 1: 'our ten largest customers accounted for 30% of our consolidated revenues'”
The company's concentration profile is led by a high-share structural exposure to utility and power customers. This customer segment represents the largest disclosed share of consolidated revenues by a significant margin, reflecting the company's strategic positioning as a specialty contractor serving the electrical infrastructure build-out. The structural character is clear: the concentration reflects where the company's workforce capabilities, contractor relationships, and long-term backlog are organized — it is not an accidental dependency but the core of the business design. Revenue from utility and power customers moves with infrastructure capital expenditure cycles and regulatory investment allowances, rather than with any single counterparty's decision. (Note: the specific percentage for this segment appears only inside a pipe-delimited table in the filing and is therefore described qualitatively rather than cited numerically.) Layered within the broader customer base, the ten largest customers accounted for 30% of consolidated revenues — a moderate share by disclosed size with dependency character. This means that while revenue is spread across a large number of customers, the top decile still represents a meaningful concentration at the named-account level. A simultaneous reduction in capital programs from several of the ten largest customers could affect results meaningfully. Together these exposures describe a business whose revenue is structurally tied to the pace of U.S. electricity infrastructure investment, with a moderate additional layer of top-customer dependency. Both are consistent with the business model, and neither introduces a single-name idiosyncratic risk at a level that would disproportionately move results.
For the engine’s reasoning on PWR’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACA | Arcosa, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| PWR● | Quanta Services, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| AGX | Argan, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| ACM | AECOM | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| BLD | TopBuild Corp. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| APG | APi Group Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.