Value
2.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.0 |
| P/S | 5.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.3 |
| PEG | 1.6 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 49.9x
- ▸PEG: 6.42
- ▸Expensive valuation
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Ormat Technologies delivered 4 consecutive earnings beats and 76% revenue growth, but negative free cash flow, a very expensive valuation at 56x forward earnings, and failing momentum and asymmetry gates make this a hold-at-best, exit-candidate situation.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Ormat beat earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with an average positive surprise of 20.5%, including a 44% beat in the most recent quarter. Earnings | Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with average surprise above 10%. | →Stable |
| CounterUtility-scale renewable operators set conservative guidance to manage regulatory expectations, making consistent beats easier to achieve but less informative about true earnings power. | ||
Revenue grew 76% year-over-year, placing the company as an industry growth leader in renewable utilities, driven by expansion of its electricity segment which represents 70% of revenue. Peer-rank breakdown | Revenue growth remains above 20% for at least 2 consecutive reported quarters over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue growth from a single electricity segment at 70% concentration creates significant exposure to geothermal resource variability and single-market regulatory risk. | ||
Free cash flow is negative 140% relative to net income, meaning the company is spending far more on capital expenditures than it earns, raising concerns about the sustainability of the reported earnings figure. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow turns positive or reaches at least negative 50% of net income within the next 4 reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterGeothermal power plant construction is capital-intensive by nature; negative free cash flow during expansion phases can be appropriate if financed with low-cost long-term debt. | ||
A forward price-to-earnings of 56.1x and a PEG of 7.22 indicate the stock is priced for perfection, while falling on-balance volume and a negative momentum score below the entry gate signal institutional distribution. Valuation breakdown | Forward price-to-earnings contracts below 30x through a combination of price decline and earnings estimate increases within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterPremium valuations for renewable energy utilities reflect long-duration contracted cash flows, not near-term earnings, and traditional price-to-earnings metrics may understate intrinsic value. | ||
CounterUtility-scale renewable operators set conservative guidance to manage regulatory expectations, making consistent beats easier to achieve but less informative about true earnings power.
CounterRevenue growth from a single electricity segment at 70% concentration creates significant exposure to geothermal resource variability and single-market regulatory risk.
CounterGeothermal power plant construction is capital-intensive by nature; negative free cash flow during expansion phases can be appropriate if financed with low-cost long-term debt.
CounterPremium valuations for renewable energy utilities reflect long-duration contracted cash flows, not near-term earnings, and traditional price-to-earnings metrics may understate intrinsic value.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.0 |
| P/S | 5.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.3 |
| PEG | 1.6 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.6 |
| ROA | 1.4 |
| Gross margin | 1.5 |
| Op margin | 8.5 |
| Net margin | 5.5 |
| Current ratio | 4.2 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.9 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 3.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 1.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.1 |
| Price target | 6.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.9 |
| quality rank | 6.1 |
| growth rank | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.5 |
| support resistance | 9.5 |
| 52w position | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.6 |
| days to cover | 6.0 |
| volatility | 2.7 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 5.3 |
| beta | 7.9 |
| debt equity | 4.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Technical at 8.7 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-0.8=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Technical at 8.7, Catalyst at 7.0, and Growth at 6.8; the weakest are Value at 2.6, Quality at 3.8, and Insider at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.81 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEarnings miss occurs in 2 of the next 4 quarters with negative surprise exceeding 10%.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifFree cash flow falls below -100% of net income for 4 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifForward price-to-earnings rises above 65x due to earnings estimate reductions.