Value
9.1/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 4.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.02
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
O-I Glass offers extreme value at a forward P/E of 4.7x with 26.9% upside to analyst targets and a strong earnings beat streak of 3 of 4 quarters, but the business carries below-minimum quality with no competitive moat, deeply negative quality scores, and a confirmed price downtrend.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
O-I Glass scores 2.1 on quality against a minimum investable threshold of 4.0, with zero scores across return on equity, gross margin, and net margin, indicating the business is currently generating losses and lacks the financial strength to self-fund a recovery. Quality breakdown | Quality score rises above 4.0 within 12 months as margins recover and the balance sheet stabilizes. | →Stable |
| CounterThe Piotroski F-Score of 4.4 suggests the company is not in acute financial distress, and a packaging business with rising order volumes could recover margins quickly as production volumes normalize. | ||
O-I Glass trades at a forward P/E of 4.7x and a PEG of 0.02, placing it among the most deeply discounted names in the packaging sector, with analysts projecting 46% upside to consensus targets. Valuation breakdown | The stock price rises above $11 within 12 months as the valuation discount narrows toward industry peers. | →Stable |
| CounterExtreme valuation discounts in cyclical packaging companies often reflect genuine concerns about debt levels, margin pressure, and demand vulnerability, and the quality score of 2.1 confirms serious business deterioration. | ||
Despite the weak quality profile, O-I Glass beat earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, and the MACD is improving with RSI at 48, suggesting a technical recovery may be forming after a prolonged downtrend. Earnings | Earnings surprise remains positive in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, confirming operational stabilization. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter produced a -58% earnings surprise miss, and prior beats came from a low base, so the beat streak may not indicate genuine operational improvement. | ||
Volume accumulation is rising (measured by the on-balance volume indicator), and the MACD is improving despite the stock being below its 200-day moving average, suggesting potential early-stage recovery momentum that could support price appreciation if quality improves. Momentum breakdown | The stock crosses above its 200-day moving average within 6 months as technical momentum confirms the recovery narrative. | →Stable |
| CounterThe 200-day moving average slope is declining at -5.6% per 30 days, indicating the downtrend is well established, and a single recovery bounce could easily be reversed without fundamental earnings improvement. | ||
CounterThe Piotroski F-Score of 4.4 suggests the company is not in acute financial distress, and a packaging business with rising order volumes could recover margins quickly as production volumes normalize.
CounterExtreme valuation discounts in cyclical packaging companies often reflect genuine concerns about debt levels, margin pressure, and demand vulnerability, and the quality score of 2.1 confirms serious business deterioration.
CounterThe most recent quarter produced a -58% earnings surprise miss, and prior beats came from a low base, so the beat streak may not indicate genuine operational improvement.
CounterThe 200-day moving average slope is declining at -5.6% per 30 days, indicating the downtrend is well established, and a single recovery bounce could easily be reversed without fundamental earnings improvement.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 10.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 2.5 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 2.3 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.8 |
| Moat | 2.5 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.1 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 2.2 |
| MACD | 9.5 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 2.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.9 |
| Price target | 9.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| insider conviction | 8.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.4 |
| quality rank | 0.7 |
| growth rank | 0.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.0 |
| support resistance | 0.6 |
| 52w position | 1.3 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.9 |
| days to cover | 8.1 |
| volatility | 0.8 |
| put call | 7.7 |
| implied vol | 1.7 |
| beta | 9.1 |
| debt equity | 1.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 1.3 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupRECOVERY — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 82
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $1.4B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.1 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:1.3<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.1, Sentiment at 7.2, and Insider at 6.5; the weakest are Technical at 2.0, Quality at 2.1, and Peer rank at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.28 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifStock price drops below $7, implying the valuation discount is widening further rather than normalizing.
Trip ifQuality score remains below 3.0 for 2 more consecutive assessment periods, indicating no meaningful margin recovery.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -20% in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters, confirming the recent large miss was not an outlier.
Trip ifThe 200-day moving average slope declines by more than 7% over any 30-day period, deepening the confirmed downtrend.