Value
9.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Fwd P/E | 9.7 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 6.8x
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
NIQ Global Intelligence is a consumer intelligence data provider with 49% upside to analyst consensus targets and a forward P/E of only 7.1x, but quality metrics are extremely weak with a Piotroski F-Score of 0 and two consecutive earnings misses raising concerns about near-term execution reliability.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Analysts carry a consensus price target of $12.72 versus the current price of $8.53, implying 49% upside — one of the largest analyst-to-price discounts in the screening universe — and the forward P/E of 7.1x appears significantly discounted for a data intelligence business. Valuation breakdown | The gap between analyst target and current price narrows to below 25% within 12 months as business execution improves and institutional confidence in forward estimates rises. | →Stable |
| CounterLarge analyst-to-price discounts often persist or widen when earnings delivery is unreliable; with 2 of 3 recent quarters resulting in misses, the target gap may reflect market skepticism rather than mispricing. | ||
A Piotroski F-Score of 0 out of 9 is the lowest possible score, signaling broad and simultaneous deterioration across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency metrics — a multi-dimensional quality alarm that goes well beyond a single weak indicator. Quality breakdown | Piotroski F-Score improves to at least 3 within 12 months, reflecting stabilization in at least 3 of the 9 component metrics. | →Stable |
| CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 0 at a newly public or recently restructured company may reflect temporarily depressed baseline financials rather than ongoing deterioration, and the score can improve rapidly if cash generation normalizes. | ||
NIQ has missed earnings estimates in 2 of the 3 reported quarters with an average negative surprise of -12%, with one quarter missing by -56%, indicating persistent difficulty in delivering results in line with analyst expectations. Earnings | NIQ meets or beats consensus EPS in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters, ending the pattern of persistent misses. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter showed a 51% positive surprise, which may indicate that expectations have been reset to a sufficiently low level and the miss cycle has bottomed. | ||
The stock shows improving momentum in a recovery setup with MACD turning bullish, rising on-balance volume, and an asymmetry ratio of 5.0 — suggesting the technical picture is stabilizing even as the business quality remains a concern. Chart pattern detection | Momentum score rises above 6.0 within 6 months and the stock price rises above $10 as the recovery pattern continues. | →Stable |
| CounterRecovery patterns in stocks near 52-week lows with zero Piotroski scores can be short-lived if underlying business deterioration continues to produce negative earnings revisions. | ||
CounterLarge analyst-to-price discounts often persist or widen when earnings delivery is unreliable; with 2 of 3 recent quarters resulting in misses, the target gap may reflect market skepticism rather than mispricing.
CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 0 at a newly public or recently restructured company may reflect temporarily depressed baseline financials rather than ongoing deterioration, and the score can improve rapidly if cash generation normalizes.
CounterThe most recent quarter showed a 51% positive surprise, which may indicate that expectations have been reset to a sufficiently low level and the miss cycle has bottomed.
CounterRecovery patterns in stocks near 52-week lows with zero Piotroski scores can be short-lived if underlying business deterioration continues to produce negative earnings revisions.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Fwd P/E | 9.7 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 7.4 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.2 |
| Price target | 9.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 6.5 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.0 |
| quality rank | 5.0 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.0 |
| support resistance | 7.0 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| volatility | 0.8 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 1.4 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupRECOVERY — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 45
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $2.4B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.3 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.3, Sentiment at 7.6, and Insider at 5.8; the weakest are Risk (lower is worse) at 2.3, Quality at 2.5, and Catalyst at 2.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 5.79 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $10 or forward P/E rises above 12x without earnings improvement above 20%.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score remains at 0 or below 2 for 3 consecutive quarterly reports.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -30% in any single quarter or misses consensus in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters.
Trip ifPrice drops below $7.93 stop-loss level or on-balance volume declines for more than 8 consecutive weeks.