Value
3.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 45.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.20
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
MaxLinear is recovering strongly with 43% revenue growth and 3 consecutive earnings beats, but trades 33% above its price target with quality below the minimum threshold and a very high forward P/E of 47x that limits the risk-adjusted case for new entry.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
MaxLinear's revenue grew 43% year-over-year, reflecting a semiconductor design recovery after a prior downturn, with 3 consecutive earnings beats and an average positive surprise of 14.5% supporting the recovery narrative. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth remains above 20% YoY for at least 2 of the next 4 quarters as the semiconductor demand recovery continues. | →Stable |
| CounterRecovery growth rates are mathematically elevated off low prior-year comparisons; once the comparison base normalizes in the second half of the year, reported growth rates will compress sharply. | ||
Business quality scores fall below the minimum acceptable floor, with zero operating margin and zero net margin contribution from operations, suggesting profitability is still fragile despite the revenue rebound. Bear case | Operating margin improves above 5% within 4 quarters as revenue scale drives operating leverage on the fixed cost base. | →Stable |
| CounterFabless semiconductor companies can reach operating leverage quickly once revenues cross a threshold; if the 43% growth continues, margins could turn positive rapidly. | ||
Despite quality concerns on margins, MaxLinear holds a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a current ratio above 6, indicating that the balance sheet is solid and the company is not at risk of near-term financial distress. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above through the next 2 reporting cycles as liquidity remains healthy. | →Stable |
| CounterA high Piotroski score does not prevent margin deterioration; if revenue growth decelerates, the company's operating leverage works in reverse and quality scores will follow. | ||
MaxLinear trades at a forward P/E of 47.3x while the stock is already 33% above the analyst price target, producing a deeply negative asymmetry ratio of -2.23 — the single largest negative asymmetry in this ticker's data. V9 | The stock price pulls back below $75 (declines more than 15% from current $88.76) to restore a more balanced risk-reward profile. | →Stable |
| CounterSemiconductor design companies with strong IP portfolios and a recovery cycle tailwind often sustain premium multiples for longer than valuation models suggest. | ||
CounterRecovery growth rates are mathematically elevated off low prior-year comparisons; once the comparison base normalizes in the second half of the year, reported growth rates will compress sharply.
CounterFabless semiconductor companies can reach operating leverage quickly once revenues cross a threshold; if the 43% growth continues, margins could turn positive rapidly.
CounterA high Piotroski score does not prevent margin deterioration; if revenue growth decelerates, the company's operating leverage works in reverse and quality scores will follow.
CounterSemiconductor design companies with strong IP portfolios and a recovery cycle tailwind often sustain premium multiples for longer than valuation models suggest.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 7.4 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 6.1 |
| FCF quality | 3.9 |
| Moat | 6.5 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.5 |
| Analyst rating | 7.0 |
| Price target | 2.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.7 |
| quality rank | 0.2 |
| growth rank | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.7 |
| support resistance | 4.6 |
| 52w position | 6.4 |
| gap | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.7 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 9.8 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.7 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRANGE_BOUND — RSI 45 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeCATALYST — Earnings in 27d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 4.00>1.3
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.1<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Catalyst at 7.7, and Sentiment at 5.4; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.9, Momentum at 3.1, and Value at 3.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.14 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifStock price rises above $100 (surpasses current levels by more than 12%) without a corresponding analyst target upgrade.
Trip ifOperating margin remains below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters after the revenue recovery.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 in the next annual reporting cycle.