Value
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.5 |
| P/S | 9.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.4 |
| PEG | 4.7 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 33.2x
- ▸PEG: 1.76
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
MasTec delivers extraordinary 34% revenue growth and a perfect 4-for-4 earnings beat streak with an average surprise of 15%, but quality metrics remain below acceptable thresholds and momentum is insufficient to support a new position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
MasTec reported 34% year-over-year revenue growth, the highest in the engineering and construction peer group, driven by infrastructure buildout demand that has translated into 4 consecutive earnings beats. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth remains above 20% YoY for at least 2 of the next 4 quarters as infrastructure projects continue to ramp. | →Stable |
| CounterEngineering and construction revenue can be lumpy due to project timing; a single large project completion without backlog replenishment could cause a sharp deceleration. | ||
MasTec has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with an average surprise of 15.3% and a standout 40.6% beat in the most recent quarter, demonstrating consistent execution above expectations. Earnings | The company beats consensus estimates in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, sustaining positive earnings momentum. | →Stable |
| CounterThe large 40.6% beat in the most recent quarter may reflect a one-time project acceleration that raises the comparison base, making future beats harder to achieve. | ||
Free cash flow conversion is only 3% of net income — a severe quality red flag — and the company shows no durable competitive moat, meaning reported earnings may not translate into real shareholder value. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow as a percentage of net income improves above 30% over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterConstruction companies often show low near-term free cash flow during expansion phases because working capital and capex are front-loaded; the ratio may recover naturally as projects complete. | ||
Analysts see 27% upside to their consensus target of approximately $425, giving MasTec one of the broader analyst conviction spreads in the industrials sector, even with quality concerns acknowledged. Sentiment | The stock price rises above $400 (more than 7% above current $371.85) within 12 months as infrastructure spending sustains revenue. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst targets in cyclical construction names often lag project cycle turns; if infrastructure spending slows, targets could be revised down before the stock re-rates. | ||
CounterEngineering and construction revenue can be lumpy due to project timing; a single large project completion without backlog replenishment could cause a sharp deceleration.
CounterThe large 40.6% beat in the most recent quarter may reflect a one-time project acceleration that raises the comparison base, making future beats harder to achieve.
CounterConstruction companies often show low near-term free cash flow during expansion phases because working capital and capex are front-loaded; the ratio may recover naturally as projects complete.
CounterAnalyst targets in cyclical construction names often lag project cycle turns; if infrastructure spending slows, targets could be revised down before the stock re-rates.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.5 |
| P/S | 9.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.4 |
| PEG | 4.7 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 5.0 |
| ROA | 3.3 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.5 |
| Net margin | 1.5 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.2 |
| Moat | 5.4 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 9.0 |
| Price target | 7.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.0 |
| quality rank | 2.5 |
| growth rank | 7.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.7 |
| support resistance | 1.9 |
| 52w position | 7.8 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.3 |
| days to cover | 8.2 |
| volatility | 0.7 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 2.7 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 4.0 |
| debt equity | 5.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupBREAKOUT — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 58, MACD bullish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.79>1.3
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:0.6<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Catalyst at 7.6, and Sentiment at 7.3; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.2, Quality at 3.2, and Value at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.55 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifEarnings miss consensus by more than 5% in any 1 of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income remains below 10% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target declines below $380 (drops below current implied 27% upside spread).