North Dakota
“10-K Item 1: 'percentage of electric retail revenues by jurisdiction ... North Dakota| 67 | %'”
Updated
The most significant concentration MDU Resources Group discloses is North Dakota at 67%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: MDU Resources Group’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'percentage of electric retail revenues by jurisdiction ... North Dakota| 67 | %'”
“10-K Item 1: 'North Dakota| 67 | % ... subject to regulation by the MTPSC, NDPSC, SDPUC and WYPSC'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Montana-Dakota purchased approximately 60 percent of its net kWh needs for its interconnected system through the MISO market'”
The company's concentration profile is geographic, regulatory, and counterparty-driven across its electric utility operations. The largest disclosed geographic exposure is North Dakota, which represents the largest share of electric retail revenues by jurisdiction; this is a high-share, structural concentration reflecting where the utility's rate base and customer base are located, rather than a dependency that could be withdrawn. Because it is structural, the exposure changes slowly — it is a feature of the regional utility franchise, not a counterparty-specific relationship. Closely tied to the geographic concentration is the regulatory exposure: operations in the same geographic footprint are subject to regulation by the NDPSC among other state commissions, a high-share regulatory dependency that is also structural. Utility rate cases, capital investment recovery, and allowed returns are all governed by state regulators; the largest geographic market carries the largest regulatory exposure by disclosed size. The third disclosed exposure is a procurement dependency: the interconnected system purchased approximately 60 percent of its net kWh needs for its interconnected system through the MISO market — a high-share, dependency-character counterparty exposure. Reliance on a single wholesale market for that share of energy procurement means that MISO pricing volatility, capacity constraints, or market rule changes would flow through a large portion of the power supply cost stack. Together, the three concentrations are interrelated: the North Dakota geography drives the regulatory exposure, and the MISO market dependence governs a high share of power procurement economics.
For the engine’s reasoning on MDU’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDU● | MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| ATO | Atmos Energy Corporation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| BKH | Black Hills Corporation | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| CPK | Chesapeake Utilities Corporatio | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CTRI | Centuri Holdings, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| NI | NiSource Inc | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.