Value
3.4/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 1.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 78.3x
LYV · Why this verdict
Why Live Nation Entertainment (LYV) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
An extraordinary free-cash-flow conversion rate and constructive technical momentum sit alongside a 79.6x forward P/E, below-threshold quality, and three earnings misses in the last four quarters; the price has already exceeded the near-term target, leaving an unfavorable risk/reward that demands a pullback before the fundamental recovery can be weighed fairly.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
A forward price-to-earnings of 79.6x sits at a steep premium to the market, yet the underlying business quality score sits below the minimum investable floor — the price reflects high expectations that the fundamental profile has not yet earned. Value | Business quality improves above the minimum threshold — a score above 4.0 on a 10-point scale — within 12 months, providing fundamental justification for the premium multiple. | →Stable |
| CounterIf free cash flow (running at 1,000% of reported net income) is the true earnings proxy, the effective cash-flow multiple is far more modest than the P/E implies; a dominant position in live events may justify a premium that accounting earnings alone cannot capture. | ||
Free cash flow runs at 1,000% of reported net income, indicating that reported earnings dramatically understate the actual cash the business is generating — a structural disconnect that makes trailing price-to-earnings an unreliable valuation anchor. Quality | Free cash flow per share grows by at least 10% year-over-year for 2 consecutive fiscal years, demonstrating that the cash-generation profile is durable and not a one-time accounting artifact. | →Stable |
| CounterA free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio of 1,000% is extraordinary and may reflect deferred revenue, working capital timing, or non-recurring items that reverse in subsequent quarters rather than a sustainable structural advantage. | ||
Three of the last four quarters delivered earnings below consensus, with two misses exceeding 50%, which has eroded confidence in management's ability to forecast and deliver against guidance — a single recent beat does not offset a pattern of significant shortfalls. Earnings | The company delivers earnings at or above consensus for 3 of the next 4 quarters, demonstrating that the miss pattern is behind rather than structural. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter produced a significant beat of 159%, suggesting the cycle of misses may have turned; if the performance improvement is structural rather than seasonal, the trailing miss record will rapidly become less relevant to the forward thesis. | ||
With 83% of revenue tied to a single segment and the current price sitting above the near-term target, the risk/reward geometry is unfavorable — high segment concentration amplifies downside from any disruption to live events while the overrun price leaves no upside cushion. Bear case | A pullback restores at least 5% upside to the near-term price target of $172.48 over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterDeep concentration in live music events could be a feature rather than a flaw if that segment carries structural pricing power; a dominant operator in a venue-constrained market may face lower cyclical risk than the concentration flag implies. | ||
A forward price-to-earnings of 79.6x sits at a steep premium to the market, yet the underlying business quality score sits below the minimum investable floor — the price reflects high expectations that the fundamental profile has not yet earned.
→StableValue
- Expectation
- Business quality improves above the minimum threshold — a score above 4.0 on a 10-point scale — within 12 months, providing fundamental justification for the premium multiple.
CounterIf free cash flow (running at 1,000% of reported net income) is the true earnings proxy, the effective cash-flow multiple is far more modest than the P/E implies; a dominant position in live events may justify a premium that accounting earnings alone cannot capture.
Free cash flow runs at 1,000% of reported net income, indicating that reported earnings dramatically understate the actual cash the business is generating — a structural disconnect that makes trailing price-to-earnings an unreliable valuation anchor.
→StableQuality
- Expectation
- Free cash flow per share grows by at least 10% year-over-year for 2 consecutive fiscal years, demonstrating that the cash-generation profile is durable and not a one-time accounting artifact.
CounterA free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio of 1,000% is extraordinary and may reflect deferred revenue, working capital timing, or non-recurring items that reverse in subsequent quarters rather than a sustainable structural advantage.
Three of the last four quarters delivered earnings below consensus, with two misses exceeding 50%, which has eroded confidence in management's ability to forecast and deliver against guidance — a single recent beat does not offset a pattern of significant shortfalls.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The company delivers earnings at or above consensus for 3 of the next 4 quarters, demonstrating that the miss pattern is behind rather than structural.
CounterThe most recent quarter produced a significant beat of 159%, suggesting the cycle of misses may have turned; if the performance improvement is structural rather than seasonal, the trailing miss record will rapidly become less relevant to the forward thesis.
With 83% of revenue tied to a single segment and the current price sitting above the near-term target, the risk/reward geometry is unfavorable — high segment concentration amplifies downside from any disruption to live events while the overrun price leaves no upside cushion.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- A pullback restores at least 5% upside to the near-term price target of $172.48 over the next 12 months.
CounterDeep concentration in live music events could be a feature rather than a flaw if that segment carries structural pricing power; a dominant operator in a venue-constrained market may face lower cyclical risk than the concentration flag implies.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 5.0 |
| ROA | 1.5 |
| Gross margin | 1.2 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.2 |
| Current ratio | 3.5 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.4 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 1000% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
Growth
5.5/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.5 |
Momentum
4.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 8.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 70)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.8 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 6.1 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.35 (n=2)
Insider
3.9/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $26,302,422 (0.066% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.4/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.7 |
| quality rank | 5.2 |
| growth rank | 4.8 |
Technical
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.7 |
| support resistance | 1.7 |
| 52w position | 9.6 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.2 |
| days to cover | 2.4 |
| volatility | 5.9 |
| put call | 7.7 |
| implied vol | 6.3 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 6.5 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
3.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 0B/4M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (6)
- MOMENTUM:4.6>=4.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:42d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.4=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
- MOMENTUM:4.6<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.40
Upside
-3.5%
Downside
8.6%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Sentiment at 6.9 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-0.4=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 6.9, Growth at 5.5, and Peer rank at 5.4; the weakest are Catalyst at 3.2, Value at 3.4, and Quality at 3.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.40 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1A forward price-to-earnings of 79.6x sits at a steep premium to the market, yet the underlying business quality score sits below the minimum investable floor — the price reflects high expectations that the fundamental profile has not yet earned.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters, clearing the minimum investable floor.
- P2Free cash flow runs at 1,000% of reported net income, indicating that reported earnings dramatically understate the actual cash the business is generating — a structural disconnect that makes trailing price-to-earnings an unreliable valuation anchor.
Trip ifFree cash flow falls below net income (FCF/NI ratio drops below 100%) for 2 consecutive reported quarters.
- P3Three of the last four quarters delivered earnings below consensus, with two misses exceeding 50%, which has eroded confidence in management's ability to forecast and deliver against guidance — a single recent beat does not offset a pattern of significant shortfalls.
Trip ifEPS exceeds consensus in 3 of the next 4 reported quarters.
- P4With 83% of revenue tied to a single segment and the current price sitting above the near-term target, the risk/reward geometry is unfavorable — high segment concentration amplifies downside from any disruption to live events while the overrun price leaves no upside cushion.
Trip ifPrice falls below $164.10, restoring more than 5% upside to the near-term target of $172.48.