Value
4.2/10data confidence 40%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 8.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
KW · Why this verdict
Why Kennedy-Wilson Holdings (KW) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Fundamental quality sits well below the minimum acceptable standard — Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, free cash flow negative relative to net income, a failed Rule of 40, and declining revenue — while the stock trades above its take-profit resistance ceiling with a negative reward-to-risk ratio of -3.6-to-1; despite a perfect four-quarter earnings beat streak, the structural weakness of the business does not support continuing to hold the position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
A Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, free cash flow negative relative to net income, no identifiable competitive moat, and a Rule of 40 score of -5 together place the business well below the minimum quality standard — earnings are not converting into cash and the balance sheet lacks the resilience to absorb downside. Quality | Piotroski F-Score improves to at least 5/9 and free cash flow turns positive relative to net income within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA perfect four-quarter earnings beat streak averaging over 200% positive surprise demonstrates the business is outperforming even its own very low expectations, and quality metrics may improve with a lag as the earnings recovery takes hold. | ||
The current price is already above the near-term take-profit resistance level, and the reward-to-risk ratio is negative at -3.6-to-1 — any incremental buyer at current levels is accepting materially more downside exposure than upside potential. Price targets | Price retraces to below the take-profit level, restoring a positive reward-to-risk geometry and meaningful upside headroom. | →Stable |
| CounterThe perfect earnings beat streak — with an average positive surprise of over 224% — may prompt analysts to revise the take-profit ceiling higher, which would retroactively justify the current price and expand the setup. | ||
Revenue declined 1% year-over-year in the most recent period, and the combined Rule of 40 score of -5 confirms that neither growth nor profitability is operating at an adequate level — the business is contracting without compensating improvement in margins. Growth | Revenue growth turns positive above 3% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating the decline has reversed. | →Stable |
| CounterConsensus estimates for recent quarters were set very low — two were negative — and actual results have consistently delivered positive earnings; even a modest real improvement in operations could sustain this recovery pattern. | ||
All four of the last four quarters have beaten earnings estimates with an average positive surprise of over 224% — a pattern driven in large part by consensus estimates that were set below zero in two of those quarters, masking the underlying revenue contraction and quality deficit rather than signaling genuine earnings power. Earnings | Revenue growth exceeds 3% YoY alongside the earnings beats, demonstrating that outperformance is accompanied by real fundamental improvement and not solely a function of very low expectations. | →Stable |
| CounterConsistently delivering earnings above expectations across four consecutive quarters can itself be a leading indicator that the consensus recovery trajectory has been too cautious, and the actual operational picture may be improving faster than the quality metrics currently reflect. | ||
A Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, free cash flow negative relative to net income, no identifiable competitive moat, and a Rule of 40 score of -5 together place the business well below the minimum quality standard — earnings are not converting into cash and the balance sheet lacks the resilience to absorb downside.
→StableQuality
- Expectation
- Piotroski F-Score improves to at least 5/9 and free cash flow turns positive relative to net income within 12 months.
CounterA perfect four-quarter earnings beat streak averaging over 200% positive surprise demonstrates the business is outperforming even its own very low expectations, and quality metrics may improve with a lag as the earnings recovery takes hold.
The current price is already above the near-term take-profit resistance level, and the reward-to-risk ratio is negative at -3.6-to-1 — any incremental buyer at current levels is accepting materially more downside exposure than upside potential.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- Price retraces to below the take-profit level, restoring a positive reward-to-risk geometry and meaningful upside headroom.
CounterThe perfect earnings beat streak — with an average positive surprise of over 224% — may prompt analysts to revise the take-profit ceiling higher, which would retroactively justify the current price and expand the setup.
Revenue declined 1% year-over-year in the most recent period, and the combined Rule of 40 score of -5 confirms that neither growth nor profitability is operating at an adequate level — the business is contracting without compensating improvement in margins.
→StableGrowth
- Expectation
- Revenue growth turns positive above 3% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating the decline has reversed.
CounterConsensus estimates for recent quarters were set very low — two were negative — and actual results have consistently delivered positive earnings; even a modest real improvement in operations could sustain this recovery pattern.
All four of the last four quarters have beaten earnings estimates with an average positive surprise of over 224% — a pattern driven in large part by consensus estimates that were set below zero in two of those quarters, masking the underlying revenue contraction and quality deficit rather than signaling genuine earnings power.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Revenue growth exceeds 3% YoY alongside the earnings beats, demonstrating that outperformance is accompanied by real fundamental improvement and not solely a function of very low expectations.
CounterConsistently delivering earnings above expectations across four consecutive quarters can itself be a leading indicator that the consensus recovery trajectory has been too cautious, and the actual operational picture may be improving faster than the quality metrics currently reflect.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.7 |
| ROA | 0.6 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 6.2 |
| Net margin | 5.5 |
| Current ratio | 1.7 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 3.3 |
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: -38% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Rule of 40: -5 (fail)
- ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 3/9
Growth
2.3/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.3 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -1%
Momentum
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 4.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 10.0 |
| vol acceleration | 5.5 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 2.6 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Below analyst target
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.4 |
| quality rank | 6.0 |
| growth rank | 2.0 |
- ▸Best-in-class margins
Technical
4.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.2 |
| support resistance | 2.5 |
| 52w position | 9.9 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.9 |
| days to cover | 8.3 |
| volatility | 10.0 |
| beta | 7.7 |
| debt equity | 1.9 |
Catalyst
4.2/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
- ▸Dividend: 4.4%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:5.8>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-2.0=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-2.00
Upside
-29.9%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $1.5B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Risk (lower is worse) at 7.2 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-2.0=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.2, Momentum at 5.8, and Insider at 5.0; the weakest are Growth at 2.3, Peer rank at 3.6, and Quality at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1A Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, free cash flow negative relative to net income, no identifiable competitive moat, and a Rule of 40 score of -5 together place the business well below the minimum quality standard — earnings are not converting into cash and the balance sheet lacks the resilience to absorb downside.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score rises above 5 and free cash flow turns positive relative to net income for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming genuine quality improvement.
- P2The current price is already above the near-term take-profit resistance level, and the reward-to-risk ratio is negative at -3.6-to-1 — any incremental buyer at current levels is accepting materially more downside exposure than upside potential.
Trip ifUpside to take-profit target exceeds 10% above current levels (currently -1.8%), indicating price has retraced to restore a favorable reward-to-risk geometry.
- P3Revenue declined 1% year-over-year in the most recent period, and the combined Rule of 40 score of -5 confirms that neither growth nor profitability is operating at an adequate level — the business is contracting without compensating improvement in margins.
Trip ifRevenue growth exceeds 3% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming the revenue decline has reversed.
- P4All four of the last four quarters have beaten earnings estimates with an average positive surprise of over 224% — a pattern driven in large part by consensus estimates that were set below zero in two of those quarters, masking the underlying revenue contraction and quality deficit rather than signaling genuine earnings power.
Trip ifRevenue growth exceeds 3% YoY AND free cash flow turns positive relative to net income for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming that earnings beats are accompanied by real fundamental recovery.