Skip to main content
ITGRInteger Holdings CorporationHold4.3·$93.49+2.31%
ITGR · Why this verdict

Why Integer Holdings (ITGR) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score4.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Integer Holdings has beaten consensus EPS estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, but the stock now sits near the top of its near-term expected range with only 2.2% upside to resistance and a reward-to-risk ratio of approximately 0.4-to-1. Weak price momentum, an elevated short interest of 16%, and the absence of a competitive moat combine to make the current setup unattractive for new capital.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The company has beaten consensus EPS in 3 of the last 4 quarters — with the oldest quarter delivering an in-line result, followed by three straight beats including the most recent April 2026 period — suggesting a pattern of consistent delivery against analyst expectations.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
EPS continues to exceed consensus estimates in each of the next 2 quarters, with average positive surprise remaining above 1%.

CounterThe forward P/E of 13.3x alongside a PEG of 2.43 implies the market has already priced in continued delivery; without a competitive moat, there is limited justification for the current multiple if earnings growth disappoints.

On-balance volume is in a declining trend and price has been range-bound in mid-territory, indicating that sellers are outpacing buyers on a volume-flow basis even though the stock has held above its 200-day moving average.

Stable
Momentum
Expectation
Momentum improves if on-balance volume reverses upward and RSI breaks above 60 on rising average volume.

CounterThe stock remaining above its 200-day moving average could indicate healthy consolidation rather than distribution; if earnings beats continue, institutional buyers may re-engage and restart an upward trend.

With approximately 2.2% upside to near-term resistance and roughly 5% downside to the reference support level, the reward-to-risk ratio stands at approximately 0.4-to-1 — well below any threshold that would justify committing new capital at this price.

Stable
Price targets
Expectation
The setup becomes more attractive if the stock pulls back enough to expand upside to the take-profit target to at least 10%, restoring a more favorable asymmetry.

CounterIf business results continue to exceed expectations, the stock may break through current resistance without offering a better entry, leaving patient investors behind.

Short interest at 16% of the float is elevated — adverse news could accelerate selling pressure while positive results risk a disorderly covering event that distorts the stock's price signal in either direction.

Stable
Risk breakdown
Expectation
Short interest declines below 8% as the fundamental picture clarifies, reducing the volatility amplification risk.

CounterElevated short interest could serve as a squeeze catalyst if earnings beats force shorts to cover, producing a sharp near-term rally that rewards existing holders disproportionately.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.7
P/S9.2
EV/EBITDA4.5
Fwd P/E8.5
PEG4.1
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 13.4x
  • PEG: 2.45

Quality

4.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE2.9
ROA2.8
Gross margin1.4
Op margin3.3
Net margin3.8
Current ratio9.2
FCF quality5.3
Moat3.8
Piotroski F6.7
  • Earnings quality warning: 69% FCF/NI
  • No competitive moat

Growth

2.6/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth2.6

Momentum

3.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD2.7
OBV1.0
MA position8.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-MA but MA slope flat

Sentiment

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target5.6
erm sentiment6.3

Insider

5.1/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.2
  • No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank7.0
quality rank5.0
growth rank1.0

Technical

3.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.3
support resistance1.5
52w position5.1
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

4.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest2.0
days to cover3.8
volatility5.7
put call0.0
implied vol4.9
max pain risk3.0
beta9.1
debt equity6.1
  • High short interest: 16%
  • Elevated put/call: 13.00
  • Above max pain $45
  • Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm6.5
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg3.9
  • Strong earnings: 3B/0M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position. | News modifier +1 (SELL_IF_HOLDING → HOLD_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1
Passed (5)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:35d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.3=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.32
Upside
-9.3%
Downside
7.1%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE MCap $3.1B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.3 below the 5.4 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Catalyst at 6.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-1.3=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.32 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Catalyst at 6.3, Value at 5.9, and Sentiment at 5.5; the weakest are Growth at 2.6, Technical at 3.0, and Peer rank at 3.3. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.32 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1The company has beaten consensus EPS in 3 of the last 4 quarters — with the oldest quarter delivering an in-line result, followed by three straight beats including the most recent April 2026 period — suggesting a pattern of consistent delivery against analyst expectations.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2On-balance volume is in a declining trend and price has been range-bound in mid-territory, indicating that sellers are outpacing buyers on a volume-flow basis even though the stock has held above its 200-day moving average.

    Trip ifRSI rises above 60 and on-balance volume turns consistently positive for 4 consecutive weeks.

  • P3With approximately 2.2% upside to near-term resistance and roughly 5% downside to the reference support level, the reward-to-risk ratio stands at approximately 0.4-to-1 — well below any threshold that would justify committing new capital at this price.

    Trip ifUpside to take-profit target expands above 10% following a price pullback.

  • P4Short interest at 16% of the float is elevated — adverse news could accelerate selling pressure while positive results risk a disorderly covering event that distorts the stock's price signal in either direction.

    Trip ifShort interest falls below 8% of the float.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks ITGR Why this verdict