Value
6.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 8.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.4 |
| PEG | 7.2 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 33.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.96
ICHR · Why this verdict
Why Ichor (ICHR) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
The business carries material quality concerns — no identifiable competitive moat and metrics below the minimum threshold — alongside severe customer concentration and an unfavorable risk/reward, making the current setup unsuitable for new positions despite recent positive price and earnings momentum.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company generates approximately 76% of revenue from two customers, creating a concentration risk so severe that the loss or significant reduction of either relationship would materially impair the business. Bear case | Revenue from the top two customers falls below 65% of total over the next 12 months as the customer base diversifies. | →Stable |
| CounterDeep integration with large, well-resourced customers can signal indispensability — the concentration is a risk but may also reflect the durability of those relationships and switching costs in the customer's supply chain. | ||
The company scores below the quality floor required for investment consideration, with no identifiable competitive moat and quality components that flag concern across margins and returns — a profile that typically correlates with vulnerability to margin erosion and earnings volatility. Quality breakdown | Operating margin improves above 5% for 2 consecutive quarters, suggesting the quality profile is meaningfully recovering toward investment-grade levels. | →Stable |
| CounterThe balance sheet liquidity component is strong and the two most recent quarterly reports both beat estimates — suggesting operational execution may be improving even if the broader quality profile remains below standard. | ||
After two consecutive earnings misses with very large negative surprises, the company has delivered two consecutive beats in its most recent quarters — suggesting the operating recovery may be gaining traction. Earnings | The next quarterly earnings report produces a positive surprise, extending the recovery streak to three consecutive beats. | →Stable |
| CounterThe earnings history is highly volatile — the large miss magnitudes in the two prior quarters and the unusually large beat in the subsequent quarter suggest the business is difficult to predict, making a two-quarter recovery an unreliable signal. | ||
With only 1.4% upside to the price target against approximately 7% downside, the risk/reward ratio is unfavorable and does not meet the asymmetry threshold required to justify a new position. Price targets | If this pillar is wrong, a pullback establishes a materially improved risk/reward, with upside to the $90.71 target expanding above 5%. | →Stable |
| CounterBreakout momentum — golden cross, stock above all moving averages with rising on-balance volume — can produce an extended move that carries the price well above the current resistance level, rendering the near-term geometry irrelevant. | ||
The company generates approximately 76% of revenue from two customers, creating a concentration risk so severe that the loss or significant reduction of either relationship would materially impair the business.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Revenue from the top two customers falls below 65% of total over the next 12 months as the customer base diversifies.
CounterDeep integration with large, well-resourced customers can signal indispensability — the concentration is a risk but may also reflect the durability of those relationships and switching costs in the customer's supply chain.
The company scores below the quality floor required for investment consideration, with no identifiable competitive moat and quality components that flag concern across margins and returns — a profile that typically correlates with vulnerability to margin erosion and earnings volatility.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Operating margin improves above 5% for 2 consecutive quarters, suggesting the quality profile is meaningfully recovering toward investment-grade levels.
CounterThe balance sheet liquidity component is strong and the two most recent quarterly reports both beat estimates — suggesting operational execution may be improving even if the broader quality profile remains below standard.
After two consecutive earnings misses with very large negative surprises, the company has delivered two consecutive beats in its most recent quarters — suggesting the operating recovery may be gaining traction.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The next quarterly earnings report produces a positive surprise, extending the recovery streak to three consecutive beats.
CounterThe earnings history is highly volatile — the large miss magnitudes in the two prior quarters and the unusually large beat in the subsequent quarter suggest the business is difficult to predict, making a two-quarter recovery an unreliable signal.
With only 1.4% upside to the price target against approximately 7% downside, the risk/reward ratio is unfavorable and does not meet the asymmetry threshold required to justify a new position.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- If this pillar is wrong, a pullback establishes a materially improved risk/reward, with upside to the $90.71 target expanding above 5%.
CounterBreakout momentum — golden cross, stock above all moving averages with rising on-balance volume — can produce an extended move that carries the price well above the current resistance level, rendering the near-term geometry irrelevant.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.4 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.5 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
3.7/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.7 |
Momentum
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 6.1 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 8.5 |
| Analyst rating | 7.7 |
| Price target | 3.1 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.70 (n=1)
- ▸Light analyst coverage (7.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Below analyst target
Insider
3.3/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
- ▸Notable insider selling — $5,678,663 (0.182% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.1/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.0 |
| quality rank | 1.8 |
| growth rank | 2.8 |
Technical
3.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.0 |
| support resistance | 1.9 |
| 52w position | 8.5 |
| gap | 3.0 |
- ▸Extreme gap up (9.0%) - may pull back
Risk (lower is worse)
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.1 |
| days to cover | 9.5 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 8.7 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 3.7 |
| debt equity | 9.0 |
| news risk | 6.0 |
- ▸High IV: 98%
- ▸Above max pain $45
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.0 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.0>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_BOOST:ANALYST:0.70
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:40d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-1.63
Upside
-24.5%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupBREAKOUT — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 67, MACD bullish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.88>1.3, MCap $3.1B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Sentiment at 6.6 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 6.6, Value at 6.0, and Momentum at 6.0; the weakest are Quality at 2.6, Peer rank at 3.1, and Insider at 3.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.63 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1The company scores below the quality floor required for investment consideration, with no identifiable competitive moat and quality components that flag concern across margins and returns — a profile that typically correlates with vulnerability to margin erosion and earnings volatility.
Trip ifOperating margin rises above 5% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the quality profile is materially recovering.
- P2The company generates approximately 76% of revenue from two customers, creating a concentration risk so severe that the loss or significant reduction of either relationship would materially impair the business.
Trip ifRevenue from the top 2 customers falls below 60% of total, indicating meaningful customer diversification.
- P3After two consecutive earnings misses with very large negative surprises, the company has delivered two consecutive beats in its most recent quarters — suggesting the operating recovery may be gaining traction.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in either of the next 2 quarterly reports, ending the nascent recovery streak.
- P4With only 1.4% upside to the price target against approximately 7% downside, the risk/reward ratio is unfavorable and does not meet the asymmetry threshold required to justify a new position.
Trip ifUpside to the $90.71 price target expands beyond 5% following a pullback, indicating an improved entry point and more favorable geometry.