Skip to main content
HEIHeico CorporationHold5.9·$345.38+3.01%
HEI · Why this verdict

Why Heico (HEI) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Heico operates a genuinely high-quality industrial franchise with a perfect financial health score, best-in-class peer margins, and four consecutive earnings beats averaging approximately 12% positive surprise, but the stock is priced at roughly 49 times forward earnings with only 3.4% upside to consensus — an unfavorable 0.49-to-1 reward-to-risk means the business merits holding but the current setup does not support adding.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The company delivers best-in-class margins relative to industry peers, a perfect nine-for-nine Piotroski financial health score, and approximately 25% year-over-year revenue growth, representing a high-quality, compounding industrial franchise with strong execution.

Stable
Bull case
Expectation
Revenue growth sustains above 20% year-over-year and operating margins hold at or above 16% over the next 4 quarters.

CounterThe Flight Support Group accounts for approximately 70% of total revenue, concentrating growth and quality in a single segment — any demand disruption there would disproportionately impact overall results.

Four consecutive quarterly earnings beats with an average positive surprise of approximately 12.4% — including a most-recent-quarter beat of nearly 25% — demonstrate a management discipline of delivering above analyst expectations across multiple reporting periods.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
The beat streak extends to 6 or more consecutive quarters with average positive surprises remaining above 8%.

CounterBeat streaks of this magnitude tend to attract upward analyst estimate revisions, progressively raising the bar and making future beats harder to achieve at comparable magnitudes.

A forward price-to-earnings of approximately 49 times and a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 3.08 reflect a premium multiple that leaves just 3.4% of price appreciation to the analyst consensus target, producing an unfavorable 0.49-to-1 reward-to-risk that does not compensate for the implied downside.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The forward earnings multiple compresses below 35 times as earnings growth accelerates, or analyst targets are raised enough to provide more than 15% upside from current levels.

CounterA sustained 25% growth trajectory combined with the highest financial health score in the peer group can support premium multiples for extended periods as long as execution remains consistent.

A confirmed death cross pattern has triggered a hard technical block, with mixed chart signals preventing a clear continuation pattern from forming — the technical setup remains a constraint on near-term entry even with price above the 200-day moving average.

Stable
Engine gate (failed)
Expectation
The death cross resolves within 3 months, the 50-day moving average crosses back above the 200-day, and momentum indicators confirm a clear uptrend resumption.

CounterPrice is still trading above its 200-day moving average and volume accumulation (rising OBV) signals that buying interest persists beneath the surface of the cross pattern.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

3.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E2.0
P/S3.8
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E2.4
PEG3.7
Analyst target5.0
  • Forward P/E: 49.0x
  • PEG: 3.07
  • Expensive valuation

Quality

7.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE5.7
ROA5.5
Gross margin4.0
Op margin10.0
Net margin8.0
Current ratio9.8
FCF quality6.5
Moat6.9
Piotroski F10.0
  • Strong margins: 16%
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

9.4/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth8.8
EPS growth10.0
  • Strong growth: 25% YoY

Momentum

4.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD0.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.5
Price target6.7
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

5.2/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.3
  • Negligible insider selling — $471,150 (0.001% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.6
quality rank7.9
growth rank6.7
  • Best-in-class margins

Technical

3.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.8
support resistance1.7
52w position9.1

Risk (lower is worse)

6.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest9.2
days to cover10.0
volatility4.8
put call0.0
implied vol7.1
max pain risk3.0
beta6.9
debt equity8.1
  • Elevated put/call: 32.91
  • Above max pain $230
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 2 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg8.7
dividend safety5.2
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • Dividend: 7.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:4.9>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:61d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:0.1<1.5@spot
Warning (1)
  • MOMENTUM:4.9<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
0.05
Upside
+0.5%
Downside
8.9%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:4.9>=4.5. Top dim: Growth at 9.4; weakest: Value at 3.0. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.4, Quality at 7.4, and Catalyst at 6.8; the weakest are Value at 3.0, Technical at 3.9, and Peer rank at 4.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.05 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1The company delivers best-in-class margins relative to industry peers, a perfect nine-for-nine Piotroski financial health score, and approximately 25% year-over-year revenue growth, representing a high-quality, compounding industrial franchise with strong execution.

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Four consecutive quarterly earnings beats with an average positive surprise of approximately 12.4% — including a most-recent-quarter beat of nearly 25% — demonstrate a management discipline of delivering above analyst expectations across multiple reporting periods.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3A forward price-to-earnings of approximately 49 times and a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 3.08 reflect a premium multiple that leaves just 3.4% of price appreciation to the analyst consensus target, producing an unfavorable 0.49-to-1 reward-to-risk that does not compensate for the implied downside.

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $400, expanding upside from current levels beyond 15%.

  • P4A confirmed death cross pattern has triggered a hard technical block, with mixed chart signals preventing a clear continuation pattern from forming — the technical setup remains a constraint on near-term entry even with price above the 200-day moving average.

    Trip ifThe 50-day moving average crosses back above the 200-day moving average and holds for 4 consecutive weeks.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks HEI Why this verdict