Skip to main content
GPREGreen Plains, Inc.Sell4.4·$14.64+1.60%
GPRE · Why this verdict

Why Green Plains (GPRE) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

A 26% revenue decline, sub-floor business quality at 2.3, negative free cash flow, a 21% short interest, and a price that has essentially reached its analyst target with only 0.2% remaining upside combine to make the risk profile untenable; the setup warrants exiting any existing position.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Revenue declined 26% year-over-year—a sharp contraction that reflects material deterioration in the company's top-line trajectory and leaves little near-term foundation for a recovery in profitability or cash generation.

Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue growth should turn positive on a year-over-year basis for at least 2 consecutive quarters before the revenue trend can be considered stabilized.

CounterA 26% decline from a potentially elevated base could be partly cyclical; if pricing or volume conditions normalize, revenue may recover faster than the current rate of decline implies.

Business quality at 2.3 is well below the minimum 4.0 threshold, with free cash flow negative, no competitive moat, and near-zero returns on equity—a combination that makes the company unable to generate economic value for shareholders in the current operating environment.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow should turn positive for 2 consecutive quarters as the most basic indicator that the business can sustain itself without external capital.

CounterA current ratio of 6.1 and a Piotroski F-score of 6.7 indicate a sturdy near-term balance sheet; the company may have sufficient liquidity to weather the trough and reemerge cash-generative if conditions improve.

A short interest of 21%—characterized as justified given the fundamentals—and a put/call ratio of 1.72 indicate persistent and informed market skepticism about a recovery, consistent with the fundamental picture.

Stable
Risk breakdown
Expectation
Short interest should decline below 10% for 2 consecutive months as evidence that the bear case is losing adherents.

CounterAn RSI of 27 in oversold territory while the price remains above the 200-day moving average sets up a potential mean-reversion bounce, which could force short covering and a rapid near-term price recovery independent of fundamentals.

The last four quarters show an alternating beat/miss pattern with extreme swings—most recently a 248% positive surprise, preceded by a 316% negative surprise, then a 377% beat, and then a 21% miss—indicating that earnings outcomes are highly unpredictable and that guidance has little forecasting reliability.

Stable
Earnings
Expectation
EPS surprises should remain within 20% of consensus in either direction for 3 consecutive quarters, signaling improved management visibility and operational stability.

CounterPositive surprises of 248% and 377% demonstrate significant upside capacity when conditions align; if the cycle turns favorable, the magnitude of the beats could meaningfully re-rate the stock in a short time.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.7/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/S10.0
EV/EBITDA5.0
Fwd P/E9.4
PEG10.0
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 9.4x
  • PEG: 0.01
  • Attractively valued

Quality

2.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.8
Gross margin0.0
Op margin4.0
Net margin0.0
Current ratio6.1
FCF quality0.0
Moat3.2
Piotroski F6.7
  • Cash-burning: FCF -0% of revenue
  • No competitive moat
  • Quality concerns

Growth

0.0/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth0.0
  • Declining revenue: -26%

Momentum

6.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI8.1
MACD3.9
OBV10.0
MA position4.0
Volume4.7
  • Uptrend pullback (RSI 34) - buy opportunity
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment3.5
Analyst rating6.7
Price target6.9
  • Light analyst coverage (7.0) — signal dampened

Insider

5.2/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.3
  • No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.1/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.0
quality rank6.3
growth rank0.0

Technical

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger7.2
support resistance7.6
52w position5.5
gap6.0

Risk (lower is worse)

3.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest1.4
days to cover2.2
volatility0.7
put call0.0
implied vol3.0
beta6.2
debt equity6.8
news risk6.0
  • High short interest justified: 21%
  • Elevated put/call: 4.00
  • High IV: 62%

Catalyst

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
news activity5.0
  • Earnings concerns: 2B/2M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:6.1>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:46d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.16
Upside
-1.5%
Downside
9.5%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE MCap $1.0B<$5B

Investment implication

The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.7 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.7, Technical at 6.6, and Momentum at 6.1; the weakest are Growth at 0.0, Quality at 2.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 3.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.16 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Revenue declined 26% year-over-year—a sharp contraction that reflects material deterioration in the company's top-line trajectory and leaves little near-term foundation for a recovery in profitability or cash generation.

    Trip ifRevenue growth rises above 0% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Business quality at 2.3 is well below the minimum 4.0 threshold, with free cash flow negative, no competitive moat, and near-zero returns on equity—a combination that makes the company unable to generate economic value for shareholders in the current operating environment.

    Trip ifFree cash flow rises above $0 for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3A short interest of 21%—characterized as justified given the fundamentals—and a put/call ratio of 1.72 indicate persistent and informed market skepticism about a recovery, consistent with the fundamental picture.

    Trip ifShort interest falls below 10% for 2 consecutive months.

  • P4The last four quarters show an alternating beat/miss pattern with extreme swings—most recently a 248% positive surprise, preceded by a 316% negative surprise, then a 377% beat, and then a 21% miss—indicating that earnings outcomes are highly unpredictable and that guidance has little forecasting reliability.

    Trip ifAverage absolute EPS surprise compresses below 20% of the consensus estimate for 3 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks GPRE Why this verdict