Value
7.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.5 |
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 15.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.18
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Greif has been carried by positive price momentum and an attractive valuation on a price-to-growth basis, but the stock has already moved past its analyst-derived fair value target with negative upside remaining, the prior three quarters before the most recent beat produced severe earnings misses, and the options market and a flagged yield trap add further caution — the setup favors patience over new commitment at current levels.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The stock is trading above its resistance-based fair value ceiling, with upside to that target now slightly negative and risk/reward flipped unfavorable — meaning the price has already captured the nearer-term revaluation opportunity and the current entry geometry is unattractive. Price targets | Analyst consensus price targets are revised upward to at least $80, restoring a minimum of 15% upside from current price and re-opening a constructive risk/reward. | →Stable |
| CounterA stock trading just marginally above its analyst-consensus target is not necessarily overvalued — if forward earnings estimates prove conservative, the target may simply lag a legitimate fundamental re-rating. | ||
The three quarters immediately preceding the most recent report produced significant earnings misses of -14.5%, -98.3%, and -29.1% respectively, with an average quarterly surprise of -34.7% across all four recent quarters — a pattern of consistent shortfalls against estimates that raises questions about earnings visibility and guidance reliability. Earnings | EPS surprise exceeds 5% for 3 consecutive quarters, demonstrating that the earnings miss pattern has genuinely reversed rather than pausing for one quarter. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter returned a beat of roughly 3%, suggesting management may have finally reset expectations to an achievable level — one beat after a string of misses can signal the trough of an earnings revision cycle. | ||
RSI has reached 71 — an overbought reading — while price trades above the 200-day moving average with strong volume accumulation, a combination that reflects a momentum overshoot that can be difficult to sustain without a fundamental catalyst to justify the extension. Momentum breakdown | RSI pulls back below 60 within 6 weeks while price remains above the 200-day moving average, resetting momentum to a more sustainable level before the next leg. | →Stable |
| CounterOverbought RSI readings in strong uptrends can persist for weeks; in a momentum-driven environment, momentum can stay elevated longer than contrarian analysis suggests, particularly when volume accumulation is supportive. | ||
A yield trap warning flags that the dividend appears high relative to earnings sustainability — the distribution level looks elevated but is not covered at a level the analysis deems safe, raising the risk that the headline yield overstates the real income return investors can depend on. Catalyst breakdown | Reported earnings per share exceed $1.50 for 2 consecutive quarters, providing a more credible earnings base to underpin the current distribution level. | →Stable |
| CounterA high payout relative to recent depressed earnings may reflect cyclical trough profitability rather than a structurally uncovered dividend — if earnings recover toward prior peak levels, what looks like a yield trap today may normalize into an adequately covered yield. | ||
CounterA stock trading just marginally above its analyst-consensus target is not necessarily overvalued — if forward earnings estimates prove conservative, the target may simply lag a legitimate fundamental re-rating.
CounterThe most recent quarter returned a beat of roughly 3%, suggesting management may have finally reset expectations to an achievable level — one beat after a string of misses can signal the trough of an earnings revision cycle.
CounterOverbought RSI readings in strong uptrends can persist for weeks; in a momentum-driven environment, momentum can stay elevated longer than contrarian analysis suggests, particularly when volume accumulation is supportive.
CounterA high payout relative to recent depressed earnings may reflect cyclical trough profitability rather than a structurally uncovered dividend — if earnings recover toward prior peak levels, what looks like a yield trap today may normalize into an adequately covered yield.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.5 |
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.5 |
| Op margin | 2.1 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.8 |
| Moat | 4.0 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.4 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.8 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 3.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.7 |
| quality rank | 8.7 |
| growth rank | 1.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.1 |
| 52w position | 9.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 9.9 |
| volatility | 5.6 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 6.9 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 8.1 |
| debt equity | 8.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.2 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $4.0B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 8.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.6=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.59 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 8.0, Value at 7.2, and Momentum at 7.2; the weakest are Catalyst at 2.8, Technical at 3.1, and Quality at 4.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.59 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $80, restoring at least 15% upside from current price.
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 5% for 3 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifRSI pulls back below 50 and price falls below the 200-day moving average for more than 20 consecutive trading days.
Trip ifReported EPS exceeds $1.50 for 2 consecutive quarters.