Value
8.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.4 |
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.0x
- ▸PEG: 0.04
- ▸Attractively valued
FNF · Why this verdict
Why Fidelity National Financial, In (FNF) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score6.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
An 8.0 times forward earnings multiple, a roughly 3.5-to-1 reward-to-risk ratio with 13.8% of headroom to the price target, and exceptional free cash flow conversion suggest meaningful upside potential, but three consecutive earnings misses, a CEO transition, and a price trend still below the long-term average create near-term execution risk that must resolve before the fundamental case can be captured.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At 8.0 times forward earnings with a price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio of 0.04, the stock screens as attractively valued; with roughly 13.8% of headroom to the price target and a reward-to-risk ratio of approximately 3.45-to-1, the risk/reward geometry is favorable and the asymmetry bar has been cleared. Valuation breakdown | The stock closes within 3% of the price target within 12 months as earnings delivery improves and the valuation discount narrows. | →Stable |
| CounterAttractive multiples can persist without a catalyst to close the gap; with three recent consecutive earnings misses and estimates trending downward, the earnings power underpinning the current valuation is under active question. | ||
A leadership change has tripped the CEO transition gate, introducing execution uncertainty at a time when the business is already delivering consecutive earnings shortfalls; strategic continuity cannot be assumed until the incoming leadership's direction and priorities become clear. Engine gate (failed) | New leadership delivers EPS beats above 5% surprise for 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating execution continuity through the transition. | →Stable |
| CounterLeadership transitions can catalyze a conservative re-guidance cycle that lowers the estimate bar and sets up a subsequent beat-and-raise pattern; the change is not inherently negative if the new direction proves credible and the re-guidance is complete. | ||
Three of the four most recent quarters have missed consensus estimates — including the two most recent at -14.7% and -5.8% — and forward earnings estimates are trending downward, indicating the delivery shortfall has not yet stabilized. Earnings | The company delivers a positive earnings surprise in the next quarter and the subsequent quarter also beats, marking the end of the miss cycle and signaling estimate stabilization. | →Stable |
| CounterThe one beat in the set — a 14.5% positive surprise — demonstrates the business can clear the bar when conditions align; if downward estimate revisions are now complete, even modest delivery could trigger a meaningful sentiment shift. | ||
Free cash flow stands at 277% of reported net income and the Piotroski F-Score is 8 out of 9 — both signaling that underlying financial health substantially exceeds what the recent earnings misses imply; cash generation is materially running ahead of accounting income. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow relative to net income remains above 150% for 4 consecutive quarters, confirming the cash quality advantage is structural rather than a one-time timing benefit. | →Stable |
| CounterA free cash flow premium far above reported net income can result from timing differences or non-cash charges that eventually reverse; if those tailwinds fade, the apparent cash quality advantage may narrow even without any operational deterioration. | ||
At 8.0 times forward earnings with a price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio of 0.04, the stock screens as attractively valued; with roughly 13.8% of headroom to the price target and a reward-to-risk ratio of approximately 3.45-to-1, the risk/reward geometry is favorable and the asymmetry bar has been cleared.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- The stock closes within 3% of the price target within 12 months as earnings delivery improves and the valuation discount narrows.
CounterAttractive multiples can persist without a catalyst to close the gap; with three recent consecutive earnings misses and estimates trending downward, the earnings power underpinning the current valuation is under active question.
A leadership change has tripped the CEO transition gate, introducing execution uncertainty at a time when the business is already delivering consecutive earnings shortfalls; strategic continuity cannot be assumed until the incoming leadership's direction and priorities become clear.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- New leadership delivers EPS beats above 5% surprise for 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating execution continuity through the transition.
CounterLeadership transitions can catalyze a conservative re-guidance cycle that lowers the estimate bar and sets up a subsequent beat-and-raise pattern; the change is not inherently negative if the new direction proves credible and the re-guidance is complete.
Three of the four most recent quarters have missed consensus estimates — including the two most recent at -14.7% and -5.8% — and forward earnings estimates are trending downward, indicating the delivery shortfall has not yet stabilized.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The company delivers a positive earnings surprise in the next quarter and the subsequent quarter also beats, marking the end of the miss cycle and signaling estimate stabilization.
CounterThe one beat in the set — a 14.5% positive surprise — demonstrates the business can clear the bar when conditions align; if downward estimate revisions are now complete, even modest delivery could trigger a meaningful sentiment shift.
Free cash flow stands at 277% of reported net income and the Piotroski F-Score is 8 out of 9 — both signaling that underlying financial health substantially exceeds what the recent earnings misses imply; cash generation is materially running ahead of accounting income.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow relative to net income remains above 150% for 4 consecutive quarters, confirming the cash quality advantage is structural rather than a one-time timing benefit.
CounterA free cash flow premium far above reported net income can result from timing differences or non-cash charges that eventually reverse; if those tailwinds fade, the apparent cash quality advantage may narrow even without any operational deterioration.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.5 |
| ROA | 0.9 |
| Gross margin | 6.9 |
| Op margin | 7.7 |
| Net margin | 2.5 |
| Current ratio | 3.8 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 7.1 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 277% FCF/NI
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
8.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.7 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 7.7 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 8.4 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -2.2%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.5 |
| Price target | 8.9 |
| erm sentiment | 4.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (5.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 34%
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Negligible insider selling — $22,548 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.0 |
| quality rank | 1.0 |
| growth rank | 8.0 |
Technical
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.5 |
| support resistance | 5.9 |
| 52w position | 6.2 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.6 |
| days to cover | 7.3 |
| volatility | 6.3 |
| put call | 4.8 |
| implied vol | 5.1 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 6.9 |
| debt equity | 7.7 |
- ▸Above max pain $30
Catalyst
2.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 3.5 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
- ▸Dividend: 434.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more. | News modifier -2 (HOLD_IF_HOLDING → SELL_IF_HOLDING).
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLD|L3:NEWS_MOD=-2Passed (7)
- MOMENTUM:4.5>=4.5
- ASYMMETRY:3.4>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:42d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (2)
- MOMENTUM:4.5<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
3.36
Upside
+16.8%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRECOVERY — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 60
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:4.5>=4.5. Top dim: Value at 8.8; weakest: Catalyst at 2.9. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.8, Growth at 8.3, and Sentiment at 6.6; the weakest are Catalyst at 2.9, Momentum at 4.5, and Peer rank at 4.8. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.36 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1At 8.0 times forward earnings with a price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio of 0.04, the stock screens as attractively valued; with roughly 13.8% of headroom to the price target and a reward-to-risk ratio of approximately 3.45-to-1, the risk/reward geometry is favorable and the asymmetry bar has been cleared.
Trip ifForward earnings estimates are cut more than 30% from current levels, compressing the implied multiple such that the valuation advantage disappears.
- P2A leadership change has tripped the CEO transition gate, introducing execution uncertainty at a time when the business is already delivering consecutive earnings shortfalls; strategic continuity cannot be assumed until the incoming leadership's direction and priorities become clear.
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters under the new CEO, confirming operational continuity through the leadership transition.
- P3Three of the four most recent quarters have missed consensus estimates — including the two most recent at -14.7% and -5.8% — and forward earnings estimates are trending downward, indicating the delivery shortfall has not yet stabilized.
Trip ifEPS surprise turns positive (above 0%) for 2 consecutive quarters, reversing the 3-of-4 miss pattern.
- P4Free cash flow stands at 277% of reported net income and the Piotroski F-Score is 8 out of 9 — both signaling that underlying financial health substantially exceeds what the recent earnings misses imply; cash generation is materially running ahead of accounting income.
Trip ifFCF-to-net-income ratio falls below 100% for 2 consecutive quarters, signaling the cash conversion advantage is eroding.