Technology sector
“10-K Item 1: 'Technology ... 45.0| %'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Comfort Systems USA discloses is Technology sector at 45%, classified MEDIUM by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Comfort Systems USA’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Technology ... 45.0| %'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'in 2025, one customer represented approximately 12.8% of our consolidated revenue'”
The company's disclosed concentration profile combines a sector-level tilt and a single-customer dependency, with very different implications for how each exposure could affect results. The technology sector represents the largest disclosed end-market share, though the figure appears inside a pipe-delimited table and is described qualitatively here. By disclosed size this is a medium exposure and structural in character — the company's mechanical, electrical, and plumbing services footprint in technology facilities (data centers, semiconductor fabs, and similar) reflects a deliberate mix rather than an incidental dependency on any single client. Broad cyclical shifts in technology construction spending, rather than a single-name decision, are the primary risk channel for this exposure. The more idiosyncratic exposure is the single-customer dependency: in 2025, one customer represented approximately 12.8% of consolidated revenue, a low share by disclosed size but one with a dependency character. While the share is modest relative to more concentrated customer bases in the sector, this is the one line where a contract loss, project deferral, or relationship change could register directly in revenue. The combination of these two disclosures suggests the overall profile is relatively well-distributed — the medium-share sector tilt is diversified across many clients within technology, while the single named dependency is a limited but real idiosyncratic variable worth monitoring alongside contract renewal cycles.
For the engine’s reasoning on FIX’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACA | Arcosa, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| AGX | Argan, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| ACM | AECOM | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| FIX● | Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| BLD | TopBuild Corp. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| APG | APi Group Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.