Value
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.5 |
| P/S | 9.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.9 |
| PEG | 4.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.2x
- ▸PEG: 1.68
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a level where upside to the analyst price target has been largely exhausted, while two recent earnings misses and a confirmed downtrend in price argue for caution; the risk/reward does not support adding exposure at current prices.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company has missed earnings estimates in two of the three most recent quarters — including a 13.7% shortfall in the second-most-recent period — with the oldest quarter in the trailing four delivering the only beat; this pattern of under-delivery raises doubt about management's ability to guide and execute consistently in the current operating environment. Earnings | Over the next 12 months, EPS results begin to beat consensus estimates by a positive margin for at least two consecutive quarters, signaling a return to reliable execution. | →Stable |
| CounterDeclining revenue of approximately negative 2% may reflect a cyclical trough rather than structural deterioration, and the single recent beat suggests earnings power has not fully evaporated; a housing or building products recovery could restore both top-line growth and earnings delivery. | ||
The stock is trading below its 200-day moving average, which carries a negative slope of roughly 5% per month, meeting the technical definition of a confirmed downtrend; an overbought reading in this context suggests the current bounce may be a bear-market rally rather than a sustainable reversal. Momentum breakdown | Over the next 12 months, the stock reclaims and holds above the 200-day moving average with the slope turning flat or positive, confirming a genuine trend change. | →Stable |
| CounterThe MACD has been improving and on-balance volume is rising, which can precede a genuine trend reversal even while the stock remains below the 200-day average; momentum indicators diverging positively from price is an early signal that selling pressure is exhausting. | ||
With the stock just below the resistance price target and only 2.6% of potential upside remaining against approximately 7% of downside exposure, the risk/reward of 0.37-to-1 is well below any reasonable threshold for new entry; the setup does not reward buyers at current levels. Price targets | Over the next 12 months, a meaningful pullback creates at least 10% headroom to the take-profit target, restoring an acceptable entry geometry. | →Stable |
| CounterA stock near its analyst price target has already reflected positive price discovery; if fundamentals stabilize and revenue trends reverse, analyst targets may be revised upward, widening the potential upside from the current price. | ||
Options traders are positioning defensively, with a put/call ratio of 2.23 and implied volatility at 96%, signaling that the market is pricing in a high probability of further downside; this level of hedging activity is unusual and warrants caution for anyone considering new exposure. Risk breakdown | Over the next 12 months, the put/call ratio falls below 1.0 and implied volatility normalizes toward the sector average as the stock stabilizes. | →Stable |
| CounterElevated put/call ratios can also reflect hedging by existing long holders rather than outright bearish speculation, and very high implied volatility may compress quickly once near-term uncertainty resolves, potentially producing a tailwind for the stock. | ||
CounterDeclining revenue of approximately negative 2% may reflect a cyclical trough rather than structural deterioration, and the single recent beat suggests earnings power has not fully evaporated; a housing or building products recovery could restore both top-line growth and earnings delivery.
CounterThe MACD has been improving and on-balance volume is rising, which can precede a genuine trend reversal even while the stock remains below the 200-day average; momentum indicators diverging positively from price is an early signal that selling pressure is exhausting.
CounterA stock near its analyst price target has already reflected positive price discovery; if fundamentals stabilize and revenue trends reverse, analyst targets may be revised upward, widening the potential upside from the current price.
CounterElevated put/call ratios can also reflect hedging by existing long holders rather than outright bearish speculation, and very high implied volatility may compress quickly once near-term uncertainty resolves, potentially producing a tailwind for the stock.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.5 |
| P/S | 9.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.9 |
| PEG | 4.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.9 |
| ROA | 4.0 |
| Gross margin | 5.0 |
| Op margin | 2.6 |
| Net margin | 3.1 |
| Current ratio | 7.4 |
| FCF quality | 8.0 |
| Moat | 3.9 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.0 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.1 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.4 |
| erm sentiment | 5.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 9.0 |
| insider conviction | 8.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.4 |
| quality rank | 3.5 |
| growth rank | 2.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.2 |
| 52w position | 4.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.6 |
| days to cover | 7.0 |
| volatility | 1.0 |
| put call | 5.9 |
| implied vol | 3.6 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 5.2 |
| debt equity | 4.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.9 |
| dividend safety | 6.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupRECOVERY — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 69
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.45>1.3
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.0 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Insider at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE, INSIDER:0.54%=HEAVY) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.71 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.4, Value at 6.3, and Momentum at 5.8; the weakest are Growth at 1.0, Technical at 1.5, and Peer rank at 3.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.71 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 3% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifStock closes and holds above the 200-day moving average for 3 consecutive weeks.
Trip ifUpside to the resistance target exceeds 10% from current price.
Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 1.0.