Value
8.9/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.0 |
| P/S | 8.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 5.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.02
- ▸Attractively valued
EQX · Why this verdict
Why Equinox Gold (EQX) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Equinox Gold carries an attractively stated valuation — a low single-digit forward earnings multiple and a near-zero price-to-growth ratio — with strong margins and a wide economic moat, but the forward earnings estimate appears to reflect an elevated gold-price environment that may mean-revert; the risk/reward geometry is unfavorable, with only 6.3% of headroom to the analyst target against roughly twice that on the downside.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The forward earnings multiple of roughly 7x against a trailing multiple that is far higher suggests the consensus estimate was built on a recent commodity-price surge; if spot prices mean-revert, forward earnings will compress and the apparent cheapness will prove illusory. Warnings | Forward EPS estimates remain stable or rise for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming that current consensus is not overstating normalized earnings power. | →Stable |
| CounterGold's upward trend may be structural rather than cyclical, in which case elevated earnings estimates are durable and the current multiple represents genuine value rather than a mirage. | ||
The shares trade at a forward earnings multiple of roughly 7x with a near-zero price-to-growth ratio, making them appear very inexpensive relative to earnings growth on a stated-estimate basis. Valuation breakdown | Forward earnings multiple stays below 12x for 4 consecutive quarters as earnings growth is realized rather than revised away. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter was a miss of roughly 20% versus consensus, raising the possibility that estimates have already been set too high and the low forward multiple will prove less compelling once revised downward. | ||
The business carries 25% margins, a wide economic moat, and a financial-health score of 8 out of 9, supporting the view that this is a structurally sound operator even through commodity cycles. Quality breakdown | Gross margins remain above 20% and the financial-health score stays above 7 for 4 consecutive quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow converts at only 59% of net income — a quality warning — meaning the business is not fully translating earnings into cash, which could limit financial flexibility if commodity prices soften. | ||
With only 6.3% of headroom to the analyst price target and a reward-to-risk ratio below 1.0, the upside-to-downside geometry is unfavorable at current prices, limiting the setup's attractiveness even if the fundamental case improves. Price targets | Reward-to-risk ratio improves above 1.5 through a material pullback in price or a significant upward revision to the analyst target. | →Stable |
| CounterA high-beta gold producer in an uptrend can overshoot analyst targets quickly; if the commodity continues its run, the target may be revised upward faster than any pullback materializes. | ||
The forward earnings multiple of roughly 7x against a trailing multiple that is far higher suggests the consensus estimate was built on a recent commodity-price surge; if spot prices mean-revert, forward earnings will compress and the apparent cheapness will prove illusory.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Forward EPS estimates remain stable or rise for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming that current consensus is not overstating normalized earnings power.
CounterGold's upward trend may be structural rather than cyclical, in which case elevated earnings estimates are durable and the current multiple represents genuine value rather than a mirage.
The shares trade at a forward earnings multiple of roughly 7x with a near-zero price-to-growth ratio, making them appear very inexpensive relative to earnings growth on a stated-estimate basis.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Forward earnings multiple stays below 12x for 4 consecutive quarters as earnings growth is realized rather than revised away.
CounterThe most recent quarter was a miss of roughly 20% versus consensus, raising the possibility that estimates have already been set too high and the low forward multiple will prove less compelling once revised downward.
The business carries 25% margins, a wide economic moat, and a financial-health score of 8 out of 9, supporting the view that this is a structurally sound operator even through commodity cycles.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Gross margins remain above 20% and the financial-health score stays above 7 for 4 consecutive quarters.
CounterFree cash flow converts at only 59% of net income — a quality warning — meaning the business is not fully translating earnings into cash, which could limit financial flexibility if commodity prices soften.
With only 6.3% of headroom to the analyst price target and a reward-to-risk ratio below 1.0, the upside-to-downside geometry is unfavorable at current prices, limiting the setup's attractiveness even if the fundamental case improves.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- Reward-to-risk ratio improves above 1.5 through a material pullback in price or a significant upward revision to the analyst target.
CounterA high-beta gold producer in an uptrend can overshoot analyst targets quickly; if the commodity continues its run, the target may be revised upward faster than any pullback materializes.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
6.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.7 |
| ROA | 4.6 |
| Gross margin | 7.8 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.7 |
| FCF quality | 4.6 |
| Moat | 7.9 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Strong margins: 25%
- ▸Earnings quality warning: 59% FCF/NI
- ▸Wide economic moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
5.0/10data confidence 50%Momentum
1.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 2.8 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+4.8%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness
Sentiment
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.9 |
| Price target | 9.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (1.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 48%
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
3.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.8 |
| quality rank | 2.4 |
| growth rank | 9.3 |
- ▸Industry growth leader
Technical
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 8.4 |
| support resistance | 9.4 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 8.2 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 9.8 |
| implied vol | 1.8 |
| beta | 2.2 |
| debt equity | 9.5 |
- ▸High IV: 69%
Catalyst
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Dividend: 32.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (6)
- ASYMMETRY:1.8>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:48d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:1.9<4.5
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:fwd=5.9x,ratio=0.23x
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
1.78
Upside
+25.6%
Downside
14.4%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupFALLING_KNIFE — Death cross, below all MAs, RSI 33, MACD bearish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 2.33>1.3
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: ASYMMETRY:1.8>=1.5. Top dim: Value at 8.9; weakest: Momentum at 1.9. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.9, Sentiment at 6.8, and Quality at 6.7; the weakest are Momentum at 1.9, Peer rank at 3.9, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.78 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1The forward earnings multiple of roughly 7x against a trailing multiple that is far higher suggests the consensus estimate was built on a recent commodity-price surge; if spot prices mean-revert, forward earnings will compress and the apparent cheapness will prove illusory.
Trip ifEPS beats consensus by more than 20% for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming the forward estimate is not overstated.
- P2The shares trade at a forward earnings multiple of roughly 7x with a near-zero price-to-growth ratio, making them appear very inexpensive relative to earnings growth on a stated-estimate basis.
Trip ifForward earnings multiple expands above 15x for 2 consecutive quarters as the stock re-rates without commensurate earnings growth.
- P3The business carries 25% margins, a wide economic moat, and a financial-health score of 8 out of 9, supporting the view that this is a structurally sound operator even through commodity cycles.
Trip ifGross margin falls below 15% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4With only 6.3% of headroom to the analyst price target and a reward-to-risk ratio below 1.0, the upside-to-downside geometry is unfavorable at current prices, limiting the setup's attractiveness even if the fundamental case improves.
Trip ifUpside to analyst target expands above 15% through a price pullback or analyst target upgrade.