Skip to main content
DAKTDaktronics, Inc.Hold6.0·$19.71-1.99%
DAKT · Why this verdict

Why Daktronics (DAKT) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Daktronics combines a beat-heavy earnings track record, strong revenue growth of 22% year-over-year, and 25% upside to the price target with a 3.6-to-1 favorable risk/reward — the near-term case is reinforced by earnings due in 8 days and a cluster of four analyst upgrades; the primary risk is operating margin compression to 1.1% and financial leverage at 3.8 times debt-to-equity that leave a thin cushion against any revenue or cost shock.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

A PEG of 0.54, a forward P/E of 17.6x, and 25% upside to the price target — with the broader analyst community pointing roughly 47% higher — provide a compelling value case for the growth rate on offer, and the risk/reward of roughly 3.6-to-1 is meaningfully favorable.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The stock closes at least half the gap to the price target within 12 months, implying a move above $23.

CounterA large gap to consensus on a small-cap company with only three covering analysts can reflect a thin coverage base where each individual upgrade disproportionately moves the average, overstating the true market conviction behind the target.

Revenue is growing at approximately 22% year-over-year, placing the company among the stronger growers in its segment, and free cash flow converts at 201% of net income, suggesting that the top-line growth is translating into real cash generation.

Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Year-over-year revenue growth remains above 15% for the next two consecutive reporting periods.

CounterOperating margins of only 1.1% mean the revenue growth is not yet translating into meaningful profitability; if margins do not expand alongside the top line, free cash flow generation can deteriorate quickly even with strong volume growth.

A debt-to-equity ratio of 3.8 combined with operating margin compression to 1.1% creates a value-trap signal: the stock may appear inexpensive on earnings metrics while the thin operating cushion leaves limited room to absorb any revenue or cost shock before debt servicing becomes a constraint.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
If this pillar is wrong and operational discipline improves, operating margins recover above 5% within 4 quarters, demonstrating that the compression is temporary and the leverage is manageable.

CounterHigh leverage in a growth company with strong revenue momentum can be a rational use of the balance sheet if the capital is deployed into high-return opportunities; if returns on deployed capital prove strong, the leverage will look prudent in hindsight.

Three of the last four quarters beat estimates — including three consecutive beats before the most recent quarter's miss — and earnings are due in 8 days, representing the next near-term test supported by a cluster of four analyst upgrades.

Stable
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
The upcoming earnings report produces a positive EPS surprise above 10%, confirming the most recent miss was an isolated quarter and extending the beat pattern.

CounterThe most recent quarter produced a miss of approximately -29%, breaking the prior streak; if execution challenges persist into this report, back-to-back misses would materially weaken the catalyst thesis before it can be validated.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E3.5
P/S9.5
EV/EBITDA5.6
Fwd P/E7.3
PEG9.8
Analyst target9.0
  • Forward P/E: 17.0x
  • PEG: 0.54
  • Attractively valued

Quality

4.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE3.2
ROA4.8
Gross margin1.3
Op margin0.4
Net margin1.7
Current ratio7.7
FCF quality10.0
Moat4.9
Piotroski F7.8
  • Excellent cash conversion: 201% FCF/NI
  • No competitive moat
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

7.9/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth7.9
  • Strong growth: 22% YoY

Momentum

3.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD3.7
OBV1.0
MA position2.2
Volume10.0
vol acceleration1.9
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+2.3%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness
  • Volume surge (3.1x avg) on selloff

Sentiment

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
news sentiment4.5
Analyst rating6.8
Price target9.7
  • Light analyst coverage (3.0) — signal dampened
  • Analyst upside: 58%

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.1
  • Negligible insider buying — $1,565 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank7.9
quality rank3.1
growth rank7.1

Technical

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger7.9
support resistance8.7
52w position3.7
gap3.0
  • Extreme gap up (7.7%) - may pull back

Risk (lower is worse)

3.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.6
days to cover2.3
volatility0.0
put call4.4
implied vol2.7
max pain risk7.0
beta4.5
debt equity1.2
  • High IV: 64%

Catalyst

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
news activity8.0
  • Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • Earnings in 0 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Market cap $0.98B below $1B minimum. Not in investable universe.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK
Passed (6)
  • ASYMMETRY:3.3>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:3.9<4.5
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:0d<=7d
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
3.26
Upside
+34.7%
Downside
10.6%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE Beta 1.66>1.3, MCap $1.0B<$5B

Investment implication

The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 7.9 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.9<4.5.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 7.9, Value at 7.7, and Sentiment at 7.1; the weakest are Risk (lower is worse) at 3.7, Momentum at 3.9, and Quality at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.26 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Three of the last four quarters beat estimates — including three consecutive beats before the most recent quarter's miss — and earnings are due in 8 days, representing the next near-term test supported by a cluster of four analyst upgrades.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -15% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2A PEG of 0.54, a forward P/E of 17.6x, and 25% upside to the price target — with the broader analyst community pointing roughly 47% higher — provide a compelling value case for the growth rate on offer, and the risk/reward of roughly 3.6-to-1 is meaningfully favorable.

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $23, reducing implied upside from the current price to less than 10%.

  • P3Revenue is growing at approximately 22% year-over-year, placing the company among the stronger growers in its segment, and free cash flow converts at 201% of net income, suggesting that the top-line growth is translating into real cash generation.

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P4A debt-to-equity ratio of 3.8 combined with operating margin compression to 1.1% creates a value-trap signal: the stock may appear inexpensive on earnings metrics while the thin operating cushion leaves limited room to absorb any revenue or cost shock before debt servicing becomes a constraint.

    Trip ifOperating margin recovers above 5% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the margin compression thesis has resolved.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks DAKT Why this verdict