Skip to main content
CHEChemed CorpSell4.6·$453.26+1.33%
CHE · Why this verdict

Why Chemed (CHE) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.6/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Chemed carries strong cash conversion and a solid balance sheet, but 95% of revenue depends on government reimbursement and the company has missed earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters — a combination of structural payer concentration and recent execution shortfalls that justifies a cautious stance while momentum and risk/reward remain unfavorable.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Approximately 95% of revenue derives from Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement — well above the 70% level flagged as a government-payer cliff — meaning any adverse CMS rate change could materially impair revenue with little offset from commercial or private-pay channels.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Non-government payer revenue grows to more than 10% of total, reducing Medicare and Medicaid dependence below 90%.

CounterGovernment payer concentration provides a high degree of revenue predictability and creates barriers to entry in regulated care settings; if CMS rates hold steady or improve, the same concentration that creates downside risk also anchors stable, recurring revenue.

Free cash flow ran at 134% of net income last period and the Piotroski F-Score is 7 out of 9, indicating that the underlying business generates real cash meaningfully in excess of reported earnings.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow as a percentage of net income stays above 110% for the next four quarters, sustaining the cash quality signal.

CounterWith three recent earnings misses, if the shortfall trend reflects genuine operational pressure, cash conversion may deteriorate as margins compress in future reporting periods.

The company has missed consensus earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, with an average EPS surprise of negative 4.5% over that window, suggesting estimates have persistently been set above what management can actually deliver.

Stable
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
EPS surprise turns positive and exceeds 3% for 2 consecutive quarters, reestablishing delivery credibility.

CounterThe most recent quarter delivered a beat of 6.6%, which could indicate the miss pattern has bottomed and that estimates have been sufficiently reset to enable more consistent execution going forward.

A death-cross pattern has triggered a hard block on new exposure, price sits below the 200-day moving average with falling volume accumulation confirming net selling pressure, and momentum scores at 3.2 — below the 4.5 minimum needed to clear the gate.

Stable
Engine gate (failed)
Expectation
Price reclaims and holds above the 200-day moving average for at least 15 consecutive trading days, resolving the death-cross condition.

CounterThe analysis notes the move below the 200-day average is recent and shallow, and characterizes the trend as too early to call definitively — the current weakness may not yet represent a confirmed structural breakdown.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.2
P/S8.7
EV/EBITDA2.6
Fwd P/E7.5
PEG4.7
Analyst target3.0
  • Forward P/E: 16.6x
  • PEG: 1.85

Quality

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE8.5
ROA8.5
Gross margin2.5
Op margin5.1
Net margin5.1
Current ratio3.4
FCF quality9.5
Moat6.4
Piotroski F7.8
  • Excellent ROE: 26%
  • Excellent cash conversion: 134% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

2.4/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth2.9
EPS growth1.9

Momentum

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position8.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-MA but MA slope flat

Sentiment

4.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target4.8
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

3.9/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction2.0
holder change5.1
  • Modest insider selling — $2,243,330 (0.038% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

2.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.1
quality rank8.4
growth rank1.1
  • Best-in-class margins

Technical

2.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.2
support resistance0.1
52w position5.7

Risk (lower is worse)

7.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.2
days to cover7.9
volatility5.4
put call10.0
implied vol7.4
max pain risk3.0
beta9.8
debt equity8.9
  • Above max pain $370
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

3.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.2
dividend safety7.0
  • Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
  • Dividend: 54.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:6.6>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:33d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.7=NEGATIVE
  • HEALTHCARE_GOV_PAYER:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (1)
  • DEATH_CROSS:momentum=6.6>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
-1.74
Upside
-16.3%
Downside
9.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupMOMENTUM_CONT Trend continuation, RSI 63, MACD bullish

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.7=NEGATIVE, HEALTHCARE_GOV_PAYER:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.74 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.5, Momentum at 6.6, and Quality at 6.3; the weakest are Technical at 2.0, Growth at 2.4, and Peer rank at 2.9. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.74 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Approximately 95% of revenue derives from Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement — well above the 70% level flagged as a government-payer cliff — meaning any adverse CMS rate change could materially impair revenue with little offset from commercial or private-pay channels.

    Trip ifNon-government payer revenue grows to more than 10% of total revenue, reducing Medicare and Medicaid share below 90%.

  • P2Free cash flow ran at 134% of net income last period and the Piotroski F-Score is 7 out of 9, indicating that the underlying business generates real cash meaningfully in excess of reported earnings.

    Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income falls below 90% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3The company has missed consensus earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, with an average EPS surprise of negative 4.5% over that window, suggesting estimates have persistently been set above what management can actually deliver.

    Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 3% for 2 consecutive quarters, restoring a consistent delivery record.

  • P4A death-cross pattern has triggered a hard block on new exposure, price sits below the 200-day moving average with falling volume accumulation confirming net selling pressure, and momentum scores at 3.2 — below the 4.5 minimum needed to clear the gate.

    Trip ifPrice closes above the 200-day moving average for 15 consecutive trading days, resolving the death-cross pattern.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks CHE Why this verdict