Skip to main content
CHDChurch & Dwight Company, Inc.Sell4.9·$98.67+2.27%
CHD · Why this verdict

Why Church & Dwight Company (CHD) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Church & Dwight has delivered four consecutive earnings beats and converts net income to free cash flow at a well above average rate, but the stock has already traded past its near-term price target with a negative risk/reward and a 24x forward earnings multiple, while heavy revenue concentration in U.S. markets and a narrow brand portfolio leaves limited margin for disappointment.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Free cash flow ran at 154% of net income last period — well above typical levels — indicating high-quality earnings that translate into real cash available for capital allocation beyond what the income statement shows.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow as a percentage of net income stays above 120% for the next four quarters, sustaining the cash quality signal.

CounterAn above-100% free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio can reflect favorable working capital timing or deferred reinvestment; if capital expenditure requirements increase to maintain the brand portfolio, conversion could normalize toward or below 100%.

The company has beaten consensus earnings estimates in each of the last four consecutive quarters, with the two oldest quarters in the window delivering particularly strong surprises of 9.5% and 9.9%, demonstrating consistent and reliable delivery against expectations.

Stable
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
The beat streak extends to 6 consecutive quarters with average EPS surprise above 5%.

CounterThe most recent beat came in at just 2.2% and the next most recent at 3.0%, suggesting estimates have been well-calibrated; the streak may be driven more by conservative guidance discipline than by genuine operational outperformance.

At a forward price-to-earnings of 24x and a PEG ratio of 3.07, the stock carries a full growth premium — and with the current price already above the near-term price target, the risk/reward has turned negative at minus 0.2-to-1.

Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The forward P/E compresses below 20x over the next 12 months through either a price pullback or accelerating earnings growth.

CounterConsumer staples businesses with high earnings visibility can command durable premiums; a perfect beat streak and strong cash quality support a case that the multiple is at least partially justified by the quality of the underlying business.

With 82% of revenue generated in the U.S. market and approximately 70% tied to seven core brands, the business is heavily exposed to a single geography and a narrow product portfolio, limiting the diversification buffers available if either the domestic market or any key brand comes under pressure.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
International revenue rises to more than 25% of total, or the top-seven brand concentration falls below 65%, materially reducing the concentration risk.

CounterHigh concentration in a category-leading brand portfolio can reflect strategic focus and pricing power rather than fragility; the U.S. bias may represent deliberate positioning in familiar, higher-margin markets rather than a structural vulnerability.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.1
P/S7.8
EV/EBITDA1.3
Fwd P/E5.4
PEG3.7
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 23.6x
  • PEG: 3.01

Quality

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE5.6
ROA5.4
Gross margin5.1
Op margin8.1
Net margin5.9
Current ratio4.7
FCF quality10.0
Moat5.8
Piotroski F8.9
  • Excellent cash conversion: 154% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

2.5/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth2.5
EPS growth2.4

Momentum

4.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD3.7
OBV1.0
MA position9.0
Volume2.7
  • Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.5
Price target5.6
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.1
  • Insider selling (low materiality) — $3,675,121 (0.016% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank1.8
quality rank6.2
growth rank2.5

Technical

4.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger1.7
support resistance1.9
52w position8.7

Risk (lower is worse)

7.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.4
days to cover5.5
volatility6.5
put call10.0
implied vol8.0
beta10.0
debt equity7.6
  • Concentration risks: 3 HIGH, 2 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg5.6
dividend safety6.5
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • Dividend: 127.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:37d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • MOMENTUM:4.3<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.1=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-1.05
Upside
-6.5%
Downside
6.2%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.9) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.3<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-1.1=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.05 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.9, Quality at 6.6, and Catalyst at 6.4; the weakest are Growth at 2.5, Peer rank at 3.9, and Technical at 4.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.05 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1The company has beaten consensus earnings estimates in each of the last four consecutive quarters, with the two oldest quarters in the window delivering particularly strong surprises of 9.5% and 9.9%, demonstrating consistent and reliable delivery against expectations.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, ending the beat streak.

  • P2Free cash flow ran at 154% of net income last period — well above typical levels — indicating high-quality earnings that translate into real cash available for capital allocation beyond what the income statement shows.

    Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income falls below 100% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3At a forward price-to-earnings of 24x and a PEG ratio of 3.07, the stock carries a full growth premium — and with the current price already above the near-term price target, the risk/reward has turned negative at minus 0.2-to-1.

    Trip ifForward P/E compresses below 18x, restoring an attractive valuation entry point.

  • P4With 82% of revenue generated in the U.S. market and approximately 70% tied to seven core brands, the business is heavily exposed to a single geography and a narrow product portfolio, limiting the diversification buffers available if either the domestic market or any key brand comes under pressure.

    Trip ifU.S. revenue concentration falls below 75% of total for 2 consecutive annual periods, indicating meaningful geographic diversification.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks CHD Why this verdict