Value
4.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.1 |
| P/S | 7.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.4 |
| PEG | 3.7 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 23.6x
- ▸PEG: 3.01
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Church & Dwight has delivered four consecutive earnings beats and converts net income to free cash flow at a well above average rate, but the stock has already traded past its near-term price target with a negative risk/reward and a 24x forward earnings multiple, while heavy revenue concentration in U.S. markets and a narrow brand portfolio leaves limited margin for disappointment.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Free cash flow ran at 154% of net income last period — well above typical levels — indicating high-quality earnings that translate into real cash available for capital allocation beyond what the income statement shows. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow as a percentage of net income stays above 120% for the next four quarters, sustaining the cash quality signal. | →Stable |
| CounterAn above-100% free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio can reflect favorable working capital timing or deferred reinvestment; if capital expenditure requirements increase to maintain the brand portfolio, conversion could normalize toward or below 100%. | ||
The company has beaten consensus earnings estimates in each of the last four consecutive quarters, with the two oldest quarters in the window delivering particularly strong surprises of 9.5% and 9.9%, demonstrating consistent and reliable delivery against expectations. Catalyst breakdown | The beat streak extends to 6 consecutive quarters with average EPS surprise above 5%. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent beat came in at just 2.2% and the next most recent at 3.0%, suggesting estimates have been well-calibrated; the streak may be driven more by conservative guidance discipline than by genuine operational outperformance. | ||
At a forward price-to-earnings of 24x and a PEG ratio of 3.07, the stock carries a full growth premium — and with the current price already above the near-term price target, the risk/reward has turned negative at minus 0.2-to-1. Valuation breakdown | The forward P/E compresses below 20x over the next 12 months through either a price pullback or accelerating earnings growth. | →Stable |
| CounterConsumer staples businesses with high earnings visibility can command durable premiums; a perfect beat streak and strong cash quality support a case that the multiple is at least partially justified by the quality of the underlying business. | ||
With 82% of revenue generated in the U.S. market and approximately 70% tied to seven core brands, the business is heavily exposed to a single geography and a narrow product portfolio, limiting the diversification buffers available if either the domestic market or any key brand comes under pressure. Bear case | International revenue rises to more than 25% of total, or the top-seven brand concentration falls below 65%, materially reducing the concentration risk. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh concentration in a category-leading brand portfolio can reflect strategic focus and pricing power rather than fragility; the U.S. bias may represent deliberate positioning in familiar, higher-margin markets rather than a structural vulnerability. | ||
CounterAn above-100% free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio can reflect favorable working capital timing or deferred reinvestment; if capital expenditure requirements increase to maintain the brand portfolio, conversion could normalize toward or below 100%.
CounterThe most recent beat came in at just 2.2% and the next most recent at 3.0%, suggesting estimates have been well-calibrated; the streak may be driven more by conservative guidance discipline than by genuine operational outperformance.
CounterConsumer staples businesses with high earnings visibility can command durable premiums; a perfect beat streak and strong cash quality support a case that the multiple is at least partially justified by the quality of the underlying business.
CounterHigh concentration in a category-leading brand portfolio can reflect strategic focus and pricing power rather than fragility; the U.S. bias may represent deliberate positioning in familiar, higher-margin markets rather than a structural vulnerability.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.1 |
| P/S | 7.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.4 |
| PEG | 3.7 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 5.6 |
| ROA | 5.4 |
| Gross margin | 5.1 |
| Op margin | 8.1 |
| Net margin | 5.9 |
| Current ratio | 4.7 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.5 |
| EPS growth | 2.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 3.7 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 2.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 5.6 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.8 |
| quality rank | 6.2 |
| growth rank | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.7 |
| support resistance | 1.9 |
| 52w position | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.4 |
| days to cover | 5.5 |
| volatility | 6.5 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 8.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 7.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 5.6 |
| dividend safety | 6.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.9) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.3<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-1.1=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.05 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.9, Quality at 6.6, and Catalyst at 6.4; the weakest are Growth at 2.5, Peer rank at 3.9, and Technical at 4.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.05 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, ending the beat streak.
Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income falls below 100% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifForward P/E compresses below 18x, restoring an attractive valuation entry point.
Trip ifU.S. revenue concentration falls below 75% of total for 2 consecutive annual periods, indicating meaningful geographic diversification.