Skip to main content
CARTMaplebear Inc.Sell6.0·$46.13+0.09%
CART · Why this verdict

Why Maplebear (CART) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

The online grocery delivery platform combines high-quality fundamentals — 129% free cash flow conversion and a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 — with strong technical momentum; however, two earnings misses in four quarters and a reward-to-risk ratio below 1.0 argue for patience rather than new capital deployment at the current price.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The business converts 129% of net income into free cash flow and scores a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 — indicating a franchise that generates meaningfully more real cash than reported earnings suggest, a hallmark of durable financial quality.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free cash flow conversion remains above 110% of net income and operating margin continues to expand for at least 2 consecutive quarters over the next year.

CounterA debt-to-equity ratio of 1.3 introduces a leverage penalty that weighs on the quality assessment; if cash generation softens, the higher debt load limits flexibility and amplifies downside.

The earnings growth profile is at the high end of the range, suggesting profitability is expanding at a pace that could sustain a premium multiple — but the most recent quarter was a miss of -6.38% against consensus, and the quarter two periods prior missed by -34.73%, raising questions about whether management guidance is reliable.

Stable
Components
Expectation
The next two earnings releases both beat consensus by at least 5%, confirming that profitability growth is durable rather than erratic.

CounterThe two beats in the recent four-quarter window (February 2026 at +5.28%, August 2025 at +6.9%) show the company can deliver; if guidance is reset conservatively after the recent miss, a return to beating estimates is plausible.

A golden cross, rising on-balance volume, RSI at 57, and bullish MACD together signal that buying pressure is broadening across the shareholder base in a technically constructive configuration.

Stable
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
The 200-day moving average slope remains positive and the stock holds above it for at least 3 consecutive months, confirming the breakout has durability.

CounterThe moving average slope is currently flat rather than steeply rising, and technical setups can reverse quickly if the next earnings release disappoints again — particularly given 11% short interest that could add selling pressure on a miss.

With only 6.7% headroom to the price target and 8.5% downside to the stop level, the reward-to-risk ratio of 0.79 falls well short of the minimum 1.5-to-1 needed to justify new capital — the setup favors waiting for a better entry or a catalyst that expands upside.

Stable
Warnings
Expectation
If this concern resolves, analysts should raise their consensus price target to at least $48.00 within one quarter, restoring upside above 13% and a reward-to-risk ratio above 1.5-to-1.

CounterPositive news sentiment and strong technical momentum suggest a near-term re-rating is plausible; if the company beats estimates meaningfully next quarter, the target may be revised upward before a pullback creates a better entry.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.9
P/S8.4
EV/EBITDA1.7
Fwd P/E9.3
PEG4.0
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 9.7x
  • PEG: 2.54

Quality

7.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE5.4
ROA6.1
Gross margin10.0
Op margin7.2
Net margin6.3
Current ratio8.1
FCF quality9.3
Moat6.9
Rule of 405.5
Piotroski F8.9
  • Excellent cash conversion: 129% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

8.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth5.9
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.3
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position8.0
Volume1.8
  • Overbought (RSI 73)
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-MA but MA slope flat

Sentiment

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment7.5
Analyst rating7.5
Price target6.1
  • LLM news sentiment: +0.50 (n=1)

Insider

3.9/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction2.0
holder change5.1
  • Modest insider selling — $8,773,121 (0.081% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

5.2/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank3.5
quality rank6.8
growth rank4.4
  • Best-in-class margins

Technical

2.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.0
support resistance1.1
52w position7.4

Risk (lower is worse)

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest4.5
days to cover7.1
volatility1.8
put call10.0
implied vol2.6
max pain risk3.0
beta7.7
debt equity4.4
  • High IV: 64%
  • Above max pain $29

Catalyst

3.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
news activity5.0
  • Earnings concerns: 2B/2M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:6.8>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:43d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.23
Upside
-3.4%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupUNKNOWN No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.5 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 8.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.23 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.0, Quality at 7.4, and Sentiment at 7.1; the weakest are Technical at 2.8, Catalyst at 3.7, and Insider at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.23 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1The business converts 129% of net income into free cash flow and scores a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 — indicating a franchise that generates meaningfully more real cash than reported earnings suggest, a hallmark of durable financial quality.

    Trip ifFree cash flow conversion falls below 90% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2The earnings growth profile is at the high end of the range, suggesting profitability is expanding at a pace that could sustain a premium multiple — but the most recent quarter was a miss of -6.38% against consensus, and the quarter two periods prior missed by -34.73%, raising questions about whether management guidance is reliable.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -5% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3A golden cross, rising on-balance volume, RSI at 57, and bullish MACD together signal that buying pressure is broadening across the shareholder base in a technically constructive configuration.

    Trip ifPrice falls below the 200-day moving average and stays there for 4 consecutive weeks.

  • P4With only 6.7% headroom to the price target and 8.5% downside to the stop level, the reward-to-risk ratio of 0.79 falls well short of the minimum 1.5-to-1 needed to justify new capital — the setup favors waiting for a better entry or a catalyst that expands upside.

    Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $48.00, restoring upside greater than 13% from the current price of $42.18.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks CART Why this verdict