Value
7.4/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.0 |
| P/S | 6.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 11.0x
- ▸PEG: 0.25
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Credit Acceptance Corporation is a high-quality franchise with a wide economic moat, 36% net margins, a Piotroski score of 8 out of 9, and three consecutive earnings beats — the business fundamentals are strong. However, the stock has moved past its take-profit target, the momentum score has slipped below the minimum threshold, and 25% of the float remains short, creating a binary setup where the original entry thesis has been fulfilled and fresh capital faces an unattractive entry.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
A short interest of 25% of the float against a high-quality franchise creates the conditions for a short squeeze; any positive catalyst could amplify a move higher sharply, but sustained selling pressure from short sellers represents a persistent headwind at current levels. Risk breakdown | Short interest falls below 10% of the float as skeptics cover, reducing the volatility premium and removing the binary overhang. | →Stable |
| CounterInstitutional short sellers may have identified credit-quality deterioration or regulatory risk not fully visible in trailing financials; the 25% short position could reflect informed bearish analysis rather than setup for a squeeze. | ||
A debt-to-equity ratio of 4.2 creates significant financial leverage that leaves limited cushion if credit conditions soften — the balance sheet amplifies both upside and downside, and the leverage has been formally penalized in the risk assessment. Bear case | The debt-to-equity ratio falls below 2.5x over 4 quarters as cash flow is directed toward balance sheet repair, reducing the structural vulnerability. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong net margins of 36% and high cash generation capacity give the business considerable debt-service headroom; the leverage may be intentional and well-managed rather than a sign of financial stress. | ||
The business carries a recognized wide economic moat alongside 36% net margins, a Piotroski financial health score of 8 out of 9, and a track record noted for compounding returns through multiple cycles, placing the franchise quality well above the average financial services company. Quality breakdown | Net margins remain above 30% and the Piotroski score stays at 7 or above over the next 4 quarters, confirming the moat is structural rather than cyclical. | →Stable |
| CounterOperating in consumer credit, moats can erode quickly if credit quality deteriorates — especially with a debt-to-equity ratio of 4.2 amplifying sensitivity to any downturn in loan performance or funding costs. | ||
The company has beaten analyst estimates in each of the three most recent quarters — with the only exception being a miss in the oldest period of the trailing four — delivering an average positive surprise of roughly 3% and sustaining confidence in near-term earnings delivery. Earnings | EPS continues to beat consensus in the July earnings event, extending the streak to 4 consecutive beats. | →Stable |
| CounterThe oldest quarter in the trailing window was a miss of nearly 13%, a reminder that the franchise can disappoint materially; a single miss near the 52-week high with high short interest could trigger an outsized move lower. | ||
The stock has moved past its take-profit level — sitting roughly 0.8% above it — with the momentum score having slipped below the minimum threshold, leaving no remaining setup for fresh capital and signaling the original entry thesis has run its course. Price targets | A price correction of more than 10% from current levels, or a take-profit target revised above $625, would restore a viable entry geometry for new capital. | →Stable |
| CounterThe risk/reward ratio of roughly 2.4-to-1 computed from the original entry level reflects a well-structured trade that may simply require patience; the stock could consolidate near the take-profit level before a revised target creates fresh upside. | ||
CounterInstitutional short sellers may have identified credit-quality deterioration or regulatory risk not fully visible in trailing financials; the 25% short position could reflect informed bearish analysis rather than setup for a squeeze.
CounterStrong net margins of 36% and high cash generation capacity give the business considerable debt-service headroom; the leverage may be intentional and well-managed rather than a sign of financial stress.
CounterOperating in consumer credit, moats can erode quickly if credit quality deteriorates — especially with a debt-to-equity ratio of 4.2 amplifying sensitivity to any downturn in loan performance or funding costs.
CounterThe oldest quarter in the trailing window was a miss of nearly 13%, a reminder that the franchise can disappoint materially; a single miss near the 52-week high with high short interest could trigger an outsized move lower.
CounterThe risk/reward ratio of roughly 2.4-to-1 computed from the original entry level reflects a well-structured trade that may simply require patience; the stock could consolidate near the take-profit level before a revised target creates fresh upside.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.0 |
| P/S | 6.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 9.4 |
| ROA | 3.4 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.1 |
| Moat | 7.5 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.7 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.3 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 3.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 2.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.3 |
| quality rank | 7.0 |
| growth rank | 4.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.6 |
| 52w position | 9.8 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 10.0 |
| days to cover | 4.7 |
| volatility | 3.9 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 5.0 |
| beta | 5.4 |
| debt equity | 0.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.1 |
Downgraded from BUY WAIT — price $623.78 has reached target $618.02. No upside to wait for.
L4:PATH_C2_GARP_WAIT|SANITY:WAIT+price>=TPnone
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.39>1.3
The C-path quality+growth combination triggered the HOLD_IF_HOLDING verdict: quality 8.5 and growth 7.8 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of -1.79 supporting the read.
The strongest dimensions are Quality at 8.5, Growth at 7.8, and Value at 7.4; the weakest are Insider at 3.0, Technical at 3.9, and Sentiment at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.79 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifNet margins compress below 25% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the moat is eroding under credit or cost pressure.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifShort interest falls below 10% of the float, eliminating the squeeze potential and the associated binary-risk overhang.
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio falls below 2.5x — indicating leverage has been meaningfully reduced and the structural vulnerability has diminished.
Trip ifPrice corrects by more than 10% from current levels, opening more than 10% upside to a renewed take-profit target and restoring a viable entry geometry.