Value
9.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Fwd P/E | 8.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 14.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.13
- ▸Attractively valued
BMNR · Why this verdict
Why BitMine Immersion Technologies, (BMNR) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score6.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Free cash flow consumes 913% of revenue, the business has breached minimum quality thresholds, a death cross is in effect, and a recently filed critical regulatory disclosure has added a second hard block; despite 85% potential upside to analyst targets and a 12.2-to-1 risk/reward ratio, the combination of cash destruction and structural quality failure warrants avoiding new exposure until those conditions improve.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
A death cross is in effect — the stock is below its 200-day moving average with the average's slope declining 11.1% over the past 30 days — and a recently filed critical regulatory disclosure has triggered a second independent hard block, together creating two simultaneous barriers to entry. Engine gate (failed) | Price reclaims and holds above the 200-day moving average for 30 consecutive days and the critical disclosure resolves without a material adverse consequence. | →Stable |
| CounterRising on-balance volume beneath the current price suggests accumulation is occurring even during the downtrend, and if the critical disclosure resolves favorably, the death cross may be the only remaining technical barrier to entry. | ||
Free cash flow is deeply negative at -913% of revenue, meaning the business is burning cash at a rate far exceeding its top line, and the overall quality score has fallen below the minimum 4.0 floor — together signaling that the current income statement does not represent self-sustaining economics. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow turns positive and the quality score recovers above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe gross margin score is strong, and a growth-stage cryptocurrency infrastructure business may be intentionally investing at a loss to fund capacity that is expected to generate future returns at scale. | ||
The entire business is concentrated in Ethereum as its primary commodity exposure, meaning financial performance is substantially a leveraged expression of ETH price movements rather than diversified operating economics. Bear case | Non-ETH revenue streams grow to represent more than 25% of total revenue, reducing direct commodity concentration, within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterIf Ethereum benefits from a network upgrade or institutional adoption catalyst during the holding period, the concentrated exposure would amplify returns well beyond what a diversified portfolio could capture. | ||
With 85% potential gain to the analyst price target and a 12.2-to-1 risk/reward ratio, there is material embedded optionality in this name if the fundamental and technical blocks described above are resolved. Price targets | Price advances more than 40% from current levels within 12 months as fundamental blocks clear and analyst consensus is maintained at or above the current target. | →Stable |
| CounterTwo consecutive earnings misses of -147% and -229% suggest the path to target realization is highly uncertain; if quality and cash burn do not improve, analyst targets may be revised sharply lower, collapsing the apparent asymmetry. | ||
A death cross is in effect — the stock is below its 200-day moving average with the average's slope declining 11.1% over the past 30 days — and a recently filed critical regulatory disclosure has triggered a second independent hard block, together creating two simultaneous barriers to entry.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- Price reclaims and holds above the 200-day moving average for 30 consecutive days and the critical disclosure resolves without a material adverse consequence.
CounterRising on-balance volume beneath the current price suggests accumulation is occurring even during the downtrend, and if the critical disclosure resolves favorably, the death cross may be the only remaining technical barrier to entry.
Free cash flow is deeply negative at -913% of revenue, meaning the business is burning cash at a rate far exceeding its top line, and the overall quality score has fallen below the minimum 4.0 floor — together signaling that the current income statement does not represent self-sustaining economics.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow turns positive and the quality score recovers above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters within 12 months.
CounterThe gross margin score is strong, and a growth-stage cryptocurrency infrastructure business may be intentionally investing at a loss to fund capacity that is expected to generate future returns at scale.
The entire business is concentrated in Ethereum as its primary commodity exposure, meaning financial performance is substantially a leveraged expression of ETH price movements rather than diversified operating economics.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Non-ETH revenue streams grow to represent more than 25% of total revenue, reducing direct commodity concentration, within 12 months.
CounterIf Ethereum benefits from a network upgrade or institutional adoption catalyst during the holding period, the concentrated exposure would amplify returns well beyond what a diversified portfolio could capture.
With 85% potential gain to the analyst price target and a 12.2-to-1 risk/reward ratio, there is material embedded optionality in this name if the fundamental and technical blocks described above are resolved.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- Price advances more than 40% from current levels within 12 months as fundamental blocks clear and analyst consensus is maintained at or above the current target.
CounterTwo consecutive earnings misses of -147% and -229% suggest the path to target realization is highly uncertain; if quality and cash burn do not improve, analyst targets may be revised sharply lower, collapsing the apparent asymmetry.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 9.3 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 7.2 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
- ▸Cash-burning: FCF -913% of revenue
- ▸Rule of 40: -285 (fail)
Growth
10.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
Momentum
1.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 0.7 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Capitulation risk (RSI 30, below 200MA)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -12.3%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.5 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 10.0 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: -0.31 (n=7)
- ▸Analyst upside: 179%
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Negligible insider buying — $15,446 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.0 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 10.0 |
- ▸Industry growth leader
- ▸Conservative debt levels
Technical
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 10.0 |
| support resistance | 9.5 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.7 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 8.8 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 4.6 |
| debt equity | 9.9 |
| news risk | 5.0 |
- ▸High IV: 93%
- ▸Above max pain $3
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/2M
- ▸Earnings in 7 days
- ▸Dividend: 7.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (5)
- ASYMMETRY:9.1>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (4)
- MOMENTUM:1.1<4.5
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
- 8K_CRITICAL:4.01
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:7d<=7d
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
9.12
Upside
+136.7%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupFALLING_KNIFE — Death cross, below all MAs, RSI 30, MACD bearish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.61>1.3
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:1.1<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Value at 9.0, and Technical at 6.1; the weakest are Momentum at 1.1, Quality at 3.9, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 4 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 9.12 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Free cash flow is deeply negative at -913% of revenue, meaning the business is burning cash at a rate far exceeding its top line, and the overall quality score has fallen below the minimum 4.0 floor — together signaling that the current income statement does not represent self-sustaining economics.
Trip ifFree cash flow turns positive and the quality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2The entire business is concentrated in Ethereum as its primary commodity exposure, meaning financial performance is substantially a leveraged expression of ETH price movements rather than diversified operating economics.
Trip ifNon-ETH revenue streams exceed 25% of total revenue.
- P3A death cross is in effect — the stock is below its 200-day moving average with the average's slope declining 11.1% over the past 30 days — and a recently filed critical regulatory disclosure has triggered a second independent hard block, together creating two simultaneous barriers to entry.
Trip ifPrice closes above the 200-day moving average and holds for 30 consecutive trading days.
- P4With 85% potential gain to the analyst price target and a 12.2-to-1 risk/reward ratio, there is material embedded optionality in this name if the fundamental and technical blocks described above are resolved.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $22.00, reducing potential upside to less than 30% from current levels.