Value
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.6 |
| P/S | 9.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 14.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.27
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
The utility trades above its price target with negative free cash flow, quality at the minimum acceptable floor, and deteriorating momentum — the setup favors reducing exposure rather than adding, as both the income appeal and the risk/reward geometry are unfavorable.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Free cash flow is deeply negative relative to net income — at -161%, the company is not converting reported earnings into cash, raising serious questions about the sustainability of its capital return program and its capacity to self-fund operations. Quality breakdown | Over 12 months, free cash flow should turn positive and FCF as a percentage of net income should recover above 50% to confirm that reported earnings are backed by real cash generation. | →Stable |
| CounterUtilities routinely run negative reported free cash flow during large capital expenditure programs that expand the regulated rate base; if those investments earn an allowed return, the apparent cash deficit may resolve as projects complete and depreciation catches up. | ||
The dividend yield is flagged as potentially uncovered — a high headline yield unsupported by free cash flow creates a yield trap where investors chasing income may face a distribution cut rather than a compounding return. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend coverage should improve materially over 12 months; if free cash flow recovers, payout sustainability will follow — but a cut or suspension would confirm the income risk. | →Stable |
| CounterRegulated utilities often maintain dividends across multiple rate cycles by accessing debt and equity markets; a supportive rate case outcome could sustain the distribution longer than current cash flow metrics suggest. | ||
Business quality sits at the minimum acceptable threshold, with weak return on assets, thin operating margins, and quality at the floor — leaving no buffer against further operational deterioration before the position becomes untenable. Scores | Return on assets and operating margin should improve over the next 12 months, pushing the quality score measurably above its current level and signaling that the fundamental franchise is recovering. | →Stable |
| CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 indicates balance-sheet health that often leads broader quality improvement; the score may be a leading indicator of recovery even while margin metrics remain soft. | ||
Price momentum has fallen below acceptable levels with on-balance volume declining and the stock sitting below its 200-day moving average — though the moving average itself is still rising slightly, leaving open the possibility this is a pullback within an uptrend rather than a confirmed breakdown. Momentum breakdown | The stock should reclaim its 200-day moving average and on-balance volume should stabilize or reverse upward within 12 months to confirm the uptrend is intact. | →Stable |
| CounterThe 200-day moving average is still rising modestly, meaning the longer-term trend has not yet rolled over; a sentiment or macro catalyst could quickly restore momentum without requiring any fundamental improvement. | ||
CounterUtilities routinely run negative reported free cash flow during large capital expenditure programs that expand the regulated rate base; if those investments earn an allowed return, the apparent cash deficit may resolve as projects complete and depreciation catches up.
CounterRegulated utilities often maintain dividends across multiple rate cycles by accessing debt and equity markets; a supportive rate case outcome could sustain the distribution longer than current cash flow metrics suggest.
CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 indicates balance-sheet health that often leads broader quality improvement; the score may be a leading indicator of recovery even while margin metrics remain soft.
CounterThe 200-day moving average is still rising modestly, meaning the longer-term trend has not yet rolled over; a sentiment or macro catalyst could quickly restore momentum without requiring any fundamental improvement.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.6 |
| P/S | 9.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.9 |
| ROA | 1.5 |
| Gross margin | 3.4 |
| Op margin | 9.1 |
| Net margin | 3.4 |
| Current ratio | 4.1 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.6 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.1 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 6.4 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 6.8 |
| erm sentiment | 4.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.0 |
| quality rank | 1.0 |
| growth rank | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.5 |
| 52w position | 7.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 9.0 |
| volatility | 8.0 |
| put call | 9.3 |
| implied vol | 1.6 |
| beta | 7.6 |
| debt equity | 4.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupMOMENTUM_CONT — Trend continuation, RSI 57, MACD bullish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $4.6B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 8.1 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-0.5=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.1, Value at 6.9, and Catalyst at 6.7; the weakest are Technical at 2.6, Peer rank at 3.8, and Quality at 4.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.46 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFCF as a percentage of net income rises above 50% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifFree cash flow turns positive and covers the annual dividend by more than 1.0x for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 5.5 on the 10-point scale for 2 consecutive reporting periods.
Trip ifPrice reclaims and holds above the 200-day moving average for more than 4 consecutive weeks.