Skip to main content
AQNAlgonquin Power & Utilities CorSell5.7·$6.05+1.25%
AQN · Why this verdict

Why Algonquin Power & Utilities Cor (AQN) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

The utility trades above its price target with negative free cash flow, quality at the minimum acceptable floor, and deteriorating momentum — the setup favors reducing exposure rather than adding, as both the income appeal and the risk/reward geometry are unfavorable.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Free cash flow is deeply negative relative to net income — at -161%, the company is not converting reported earnings into cash, raising serious questions about the sustainability of its capital return program and its capacity to self-fund operations.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Over 12 months, free cash flow should turn positive and FCF as a percentage of net income should recover above 50% to confirm that reported earnings are backed by real cash generation.

CounterUtilities routinely run negative reported free cash flow during large capital expenditure programs that expand the regulated rate base; if those investments earn an allowed return, the apparent cash deficit may resolve as projects complete and depreciation catches up.

The dividend yield is flagged as potentially uncovered — a high headline yield unsupported by free cash flow creates a yield trap where investors chasing income may face a distribution cut rather than a compounding return.

Stable
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
Dividend coverage should improve materially over 12 months; if free cash flow recovers, payout sustainability will follow — but a cut or suspension would confirm the income risk.

CounterRegulated utilities often maintain dividends across multiple rate cycles by accessing debt and equity markets; a supportive rate case outcome could sustain the distribution longer than current cash flow metrics suggest.

Business quality sits at the minimum acceptable threshold, with weak return on assets, thin operating margins, and quality at the floor — leaving no buffer against further operational deterioration before the position becomes untenable.

Stable
Scores
Expectation
Return on assets and operating margin should improve over the next 12 months, pushing the quality score measurably above its current level and signaling that the fundamental franchise is recovering.

CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 indicates balance-sheet health that often leads broader quality improvement; the score may be a leading indicator of recovery even while margin metrics remain soft.

Price momentum has fallen below acceptable levels with on-balance volume declining and the stock sitting below its 200-day moving average — though the moving average itself is still rising slightly, leaving open the possibility this is a pullback within an uptrend rather than a confirmed breakdown.

Stable
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
The stock should reclaim its 200-day moving average and on-balance volume should stabilize or reverse upward within 12 months to confirm the uptrend is intact.

CounterThe 200-day moving average is still rising modestly, meaning the longer-term trend has not yet rolled over; a sentiment or macro catalyst could quickly restore momentum without requiring any fundamental improvement.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.6
P/S9.1
EV/EBITDA4.3
Fwd P/E8.0
PEG10.0
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 14.9x
  • PEG: 0.27

Quality

4.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.9
ROA1.5
Gross margin3.4
Op margin9.1
Net margin3.4
Current ratio4.1
FCF quality0.0
Moat5.6
Piotroski F7.8
  • Earnings quality RED FLAG: -161% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

8.1/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth6.1
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD6.4
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target6.8
erm sentiment4.5

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%

Peer rank

3.8/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank3.0
quality rank1.0
growth rank6.0

Technical

2.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.0
support resistance0.5
52w position7.2

Risk (lower is worse)

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
days to cover9.0
volatility8.0
put call9.3
implied vol1.6
beta7.6
debt equity4.3
  • High IV: 70%

Catalyst

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
dividend safety3.5
  • Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:6.2>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:42d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.5=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.46
Upside
-2.3%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupMOMENTUM_CONT Trend continuation, RSI 57, MACD bullish

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE MCap $4.6B<$5B

Investment implication

The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 8.1 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-0.5=NEGATIVE.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.1, Value at 6.9, and Catalyst at 6.7; the weakest are Technical at 2.6, Peer rank at 3.8, and Quality at 4.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.46 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Free cash flow is deeply negative relative to net income — at -161%, the company is not converting reported earnings into cash, raising serious questions about the sustainability of its capital return program and its capacity to self-fund operations.

    Trip ifFCF as a percentage of net income rises above 50% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2The dividend yield is flagged as potentially uncovered — a high headline yield unsupported by free cash flow creates a yield trap where investors chasing income may face a distribution cut rather than a compounding return.

    Trip ifFree cash flow turns positive and covers the annual dividend by more than 1.0x for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3Business quality sits at the minimum acceptable threshold, with weak return on assets, thin operating margins, and quality at the floor — leaving no buffer against further operational deterioration before the position becomes untenable.

    Trip ifQuality score rises above 5.5 on the 10-point scale for 2 consecutive reporting periods.

  • P4Price momentum has fallen below acceptable levels with on-balance volume declining and the stock sitting below its 200-day moving average — though the moving average itself is still rising slightly, leaving open the possibility this is a pullback within an uptrend rather than a confirmed breakdown.

    Trip ifPrice reclaims and holds above the 200-day moving average for more than 4 consecutive weeks.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks AQN Why this verdict