Value
5.4/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1 |
| PEG | 3.0 |
- ▸PEG: 4.16
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Molson Coors Class A shares carry a strong Piotroski financial health score and a meaningful dividend with 425% coverage, but the quality floor breach at 3.4 and a confirmed downtrend with death cross signal the business has not earned an active buy case at current prices.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The quality score of 3.4 is below the minimum acceptable threshold of 4.0, driven by zero return on equity, zero net margin, and no identified competitive moat, indicating the business cannot yet demonstrate adequate returns on capital. Quality | The quality score rises above 4.0 within 12 months as net margin turns positive and return metrics improve. | →Stable |
| CounterThe zero net margin and ROE may reflect extraordinary charges or accounting conventions for the share class rather than genuine operating deficiency; the Piotroski score of 8 contradicts the idea of deep quality problems. | ||
A Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 indicates solid balance sheet health across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency metrics, providing a financial foundation that supports the dividend and limits near-term credit stress. Quality breakdown | Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or higher over the next four reported periods, confirming that financial health is not deteriorating. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh Piotroski scores can persist even as a business faces category-level secular decline; financial health does not prevent gradual value erosion from shrinking beer volumes. | ||
The dividend is covered at 425% based on the catalyst score, indicating earnings power substantially exceeds the dividend commitment and the payout is sustainable even if earnings decline modestly. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend coverage remains above 200% over the next four reported periods, confirming the payout is not at risk of reduction. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh dividend coverage ratios can mask problems if the underlying earnings are declining; a 425% coverage ratio compresses as beer volumes fall and cost pressures build. | ||
A death cross has formed with price below the 200-day moving average on a declining slope of negative 2.4% per month, and RSI is reported at 100 which is an extreme reading signaling a potential mechanical overbought condition within the downtrend. V9 | The death cross resolves within 9 months with the stock recovering above the 200-day moving average and RSI normalizing below 70. | →Stable |
| CounterAn RSI reading of 100 in a downtrend typically reflects a short-term bounce within a larger declining pattern; it does not indicate durable momentum recovery and may reverse quickly. | ||
CounterThe zero net margin and ROE may reflect extraordinary charges or accounting conventions for the share class rather than genuine operating deficiency; the Piotroski score of 8 contradicts the idea of deep quality problems.
CounterHigh Piotroski scores can persist even as a business faces category-level secular decline; financial health does not prevent gradual value erosion from shrinking beer volumes.
CounterHigh dividend coverage ratios can mask problems if the underlying earnings are declining; a 425% coverage ratio compresses as beer volumes fall and cost pressures build.
CounterAn RSI reading of 100 in a downtrend typically reflects a short-term bounce within a larger declining pattern; it does not indicate durable momentum recovery and may reverse quickly.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1 |
| PEG | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 3.0 |
| Gross margin | 3.7 |
| Op margin | 5.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 2.1 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.0 |
| EPS growth | 9.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 8.0 |
| Volume | 10.0 |
| vol acceleration | 9.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.3 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.0 |
| 52w position | 6.8 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 3.3 |
| volatility | 8.7 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 7.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupMOMENTUM_CONT — Trend continuation, RSI 64, MACD bullish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Momentum at 8.7 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 8.7, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.3, and Growth at 6.0; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.3, Technical at 3.0, and Quality at 3.4. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score drops below 6 in any reported period, indicating deterioration of more than 2 points from the current score of 8.
Trip ifDividend is cut by more than 20% from the current level, indicating that the 425% coverage ratio has not provided the protection suggested by the metric.
Trip ifQuality score remains below 4.0 for more than 4 consecutive reported periods, indicating no progress toward the minimum acceptable level.
Trip ifPrice falls below $40, more than 11% below the current price of $45.22, indicating the death cross recovery has not materialized and the downtrend is continuing.