Value
9.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.0 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸PEG: 0.00
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Seneca Foods offers exceptional value with a near-perfect Piotroski score of 8/9 and a strong earnings beat track record, but the stock has already reached its analyst price target, leaving limited room for additional gain at current prices.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
A Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 reflects broad financial strength across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency — a rare signal in the packaged foods industry that the business is genuinely improving. Quality breakdown | Piotroski score remains at 8 or rises to 9 over the next 12 months as earnings and balance sheet trends continue. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh Piotroski scores in mature food companies can be backward-looking; they do not guarantee future growth if input cost inflation or volume declines emerge. | ||
The company beat earnings estimates in 3 of its last 4 quarters, with an average positive surprise of 480%, indicating the business is consistently outperforming what analysts expect. Catalyst breakdown | Earnings beats continue in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters, sustaining positive surprise momentum. | →Stable |
| CounterThe earnings history dates show very old quarters (2011-2012), which may not represent current business conditions, and the data quality could be stale. | ||
With a PEG ratio near zero and strong value scores across price-to-earnings, price-to-sales, and EV/EBITDA, Seneca Foods trades at a significant discount to intrinsic value relative to earnings growth. Valuation breakdown | Valuation multiples expand over 12 months as the market re-rates the stock toward peer averages, lifting the price by more than 10%. | →Stable |
| CounterLow valuations in small-cap consumer staples often persist for years without a catalyst; without institutional interest or analyst coverage expansion, the discount may not close. | ||
The stock has reached its analyst price target with only 2.6% upside remaining at current prices, and the reward-to-risk ratio of 0.37x is well below the 1.5x minimum threshold, making new entry unappealing. Warnings | Analyst price targets are raised by more than 10% over the next 12 months to reopen a favorable entry point. | →Stable |
| CounterSingle-analyst coverage limits target reliability; a broader analyst following could reset the target substantially higher. | ||
CounterHigh Piotroski scores in mature food companies can be backward-looking; they do not guarantee future growth if input cost inflation or volume declines emerge.
CounterThe earnings history dates show very old quarters (2011-2012), which may not represent current business conditions, and the data quality could be stale.
CounterLow valuations in small-cap consumer staples often persist for years without a catalyst; without institutional interest or analyst coverage expansion, the discount may not close.
CounterSingle-analyst coverage limits target reliability; a broader analyst following could reset the target substantially higher.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.0 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 5.5 |
| ROA | 5.4 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 2.6 |
| Net margin | 3.5 |
| Current ratio | 7.9 |
| FCF quality | 6.0 |
| Moat | 6.1 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.9 |
| Price target | 7.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.6 |
| quality rank | 6.6 |
| growth rank | 8.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.4 |
| support resistance | 2.7 |
| 52w position | 8.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.4 |
| days to cover | 9.7 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 8.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
L4:PATH_F_HOLDnone
SetupBREAKOUT — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 68, MACD bullish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $1.1B<$5B
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:6.8>=5.5. Top dim: Value at 9.5; weakest: Technical at 4.2. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.5, Catalyst at 7.2, and Momentum at 6.8; the weakest are Technical at 4.2, Insider at 5.0, and Quality at 5.1. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.11 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 in the next annual filing, indicating deterioration across more than 3 of the 9 financial health components.
Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below 0% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, signaling a reversal of the beat trend.
Trip ifPrice-to-earnings multiple exceeds 15x without a corresponding increase in earnings growth above 10% year-over-year.
Trip ifStock price rises above $180, more than 7% above current levels, without analyst target upgrades above $185.