Value
3.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.4 |
| P/S | 5.6 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.3 |
| PEG | 3.9 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 33.6x
- ▸PEG: 2.70
Q · Why this verdict
Why Qnity Electronics (Q) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Qnity Electronics has beaten analyst estimates in 3 of the last 3 reported quarters with an average surprise of 31%, earns a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, and leads its peers on value rank at 7.6/10, but generates 79% of revenue from the Asia-Pacific region and currently trades above analyst price targets.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
79% of revenue originates from the Asia-Pacific region, creating exposure to trade policy changes, export control regulations, currency fluctuations, and geopolitical tensions that could materially reduce the addressable market for semiconductor equipment. Bear case | Asia-Pacific concentration decreases below 70% within 24 months as the company diversifies its geographic customer base. | →Stable |
| CounterAsia-Pacific concentration in semiconductor equipment reflects where the world's most advanced fabs are being built; exposure to this region is synonymous with exposure to the global semiconductor capex cycle, not pure geopolitical risk. | ||
Qnity Electronics has beaten analyst estimates in all 3 of the last 3 reported quarters with an average positive surprise of 31%, including a 46% beat in the most recent quarter, suggesting consistent execution in the semiconductor equipment market. Earnings | Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with average surprise above 10%. | →Stable |
| CounterOnly 3 quarters of data are available, making the beat streak statistically less robust than a 4-quarter pattern, and the average could revert as analyst estimates adjust upward to account for prior beats. | ||
A Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, forward P/E of 33.6x that ranks attractively versus peers at 7.6/10, and an FCF quality score of 7.4 indicate a high-quality business with solid balance sheet health and reasonable relative valuation in the semiconductor equipment sector. Quality breakdown | Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above and FCF quality stays above 6.0 over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA forward P/E of 33.6x and PEG of 2.70 represent expensive absolute valuation, and if the semiconductor equipment cycle turns, the multiple could compress sharply regardless of relative peer positioning. | ||
The stock currently trades above its analyst consensus price target, meaning it has negative implied upside of -6.5% from current levels, and the resistance-based take profit of $163.64 is only 1.6% above the current price of $161.02, leaving minimal reward for risk taken. Targets | Analyst consensus target rises above $180 within 6 months following earnings estimate upgrades. | →Stable |
| CounterStocks that trade persistently above analyst targets often reflect earnings revisions still lagging behind actual business momentum; the targets may be raised to match price rather than price falling to match targets. | ||
79% of revenue originates from the Asia-Pacific region, creating exposure to trade policy changes, export control regulations, currency fluctuations, and geopolitical tensions that could materially reduce the addressable market for semiconductor equipment.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Asia-Pacific concentration decreases below 70% within 24 months as the company diversifies its geographic customer base.
CounterAsia-Pacific concentration in semiconductor equipment reflects where the world's most advanced fabs are being built; exposure to this region is synonymous with exposure to the global semiconductor capex cycle, not pure geopolitical risk.
Qnity Electronics has beaten analyst estimates in all 3 of the last 3 reported quarters with an average positive surprise of 31%, including a 46% beat in the most recent quarter, suggesting consistent execution in the semiconductor equipment market.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters with average surprise above 10%.
CounterOnly 3 quarters of data are available, making the beat streak statistically less robust than a 4-quarter pattern, and the average could revert as analyst estimates adjust upward to account for prior beats.
A Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, forward P/E of 33.6x that ranks attractively versus peers at 7.6/10, and an FCF quality score of 7.4 indicate a high-quality business with solid balance sheet health and reasonable relative valuation in the semiconductor equipment sector.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above and FCF quality stays above 6.0 over the next 12 months.
CounterA forward P/E of 33.6x and PEG of 2.70 represent expensive absolute valuation, and if the semiconductor equipment cycle turns, the multiple could compress sharply regardless of relative peer positioning.
The stock currently trades above its analyst consensus price target, meaning it has negative implied upside of -6.5% from current levels, and the resistance-based take profit of $163.64 is only 1.6% above the current price of $161.02, leaving minimal reward for risk taken.
→StableTargets
- Expectation
- Analyst consensus target rises above $180 within 6 months following earnings estimate upgrades.
CounterStocks that trade persistently above analyst targets often reflect earnings revisions still lagging behind actual business momentum; the targets may be raised to match price rather than price falling to match targets.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.5 |
| ROA | 3.4 |
| Gross margin | 5.2 |
| Op margin | 9.1 |
| Net margin | 6.6 |
| Current ratio | 7.4 |
| FCF quality | 7.4 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
3.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.9 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
Momentum
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 2.3 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
Sentiment
7.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 8.0 |
| Analyst rating | 7.9 |
| Price target | 6.3 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.60 (n=1)
- ▸Light analyst coverage (8.0) — signal dampened
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Negligible insider selling — $142,104 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.4 |
| quality rank | 6.0 |
| growth rank | 6.4 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
Technical
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.9 |
| support resistance | 4.4 |
| 52w position | 7.9 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.9 |
| days to cover | 8.8 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 5.7 |
| implied vol | 0.4 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| debt equity | 7.4 |
- ▸High IV: 77%
- ▸Above max pain $75
- ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 2 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
- ▸Dividend: 20.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position. | News modifier +2 (SELL_IF_HOLDING → HOLD_IF_HOLDING).
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELL|L3:NEWS_MOD=+2Passed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.9>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:48d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.3=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-0.34
Upside
-5.1%
Downside
14.8%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRANGE_BOUND — RSI 52 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.2 below the 5.4 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Sentiment at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.3=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.34 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 7.4, Momentum at 6.9, and Catalyst at 6.8; the weakest are Value at 3.3, Growth at 3.5, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.34 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Qnity Electronics has beaten analyst estimates in all 3 of the last 3 reported quarters with an average positive surprise of 31%, including a 46% beat in the most recent quarter, suggesting consistent execution in the semiconductor equipment market.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -10% in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.
- P279% of revenue originates from the Asia-Pacific region, creating exposure to trade policy changes, export control regulations, currency fluctuations, and geopolitical tensions that could materially reduce the addressable market for semiconductor equipment.
Trip ifAsia-Pacific revenue share rises above 85% in any annual filing.
- P3A Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, forward P/E of 33.6x that ranks attractively versus peers at 7.6/10, and an FCF quality score of 7.4 indicate a high-quality business with solid balance sheet health and reasonable relative valuation in the semiconductor equipment sector.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 for 2 consecutive reporting periods.
- P4The stock currently trades above its analyst consensus price target, meaning it has negative implied upside of -6.5% from current levels, and the resistance-based take profit of $163.64 is only 1.6% above the current price of $161.02, leaving minimal reward for risk taken.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus target falls below $140, a decline of more than 13% from the current target of $163.