Value
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.3 |
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.3 |
| PEG | 4.7 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 14.0x
- ▸PEG: 1.84
PPG · Why this verdict
Why PPG Industries (PPG) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
PPG Industries shows strong positive momentum with a 7.1 momentum score, rising on-balance volume, and an RSI of 72 indicating near-term overbought conditions, while the stock has exceeded its analyst target by 8.9% with negative implied upside, leaving the current setup unfavorable despite solid quality metrics and a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8/9.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At $121.53 the stock is priced 8.9% above the analyst consensus target, meaning there is negative implied upside to the median professional estimate, which is unusual for a hold-rated name and suggests the near-term risk-reward is unfavorable. Bear case | Analyst consensus price targets rise above $130 within 6 months, driven by estimate revisions following earnings results. | →Stable |
| CounterPPG's positive price momentum and rising analyst sentiment score suggest that consensus estimates may be lagging the fundamental improvement; targets could be revised higher post-earnings. | ||
Momentum scored 7.1 out of 10 with rising on-balance volume, MACD in positive territory, and the stock trading above its 200-day moving average, while RSI of 72 indicates that near-term buying pressure has pushed the stock into overbought territory. Momentum breakdown | RSI returns to below 60 without a significant price correction, allowing the momentum to consolidate at a healthier level before advancing further. | →Stable |
| CounterOverbought conditions in a stock with strong institutional accumulation can persist for extended periods; RSI above 70 is not automatically a sell signal in uptrending markets. | ||
PPG scores a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, ranks above peers on both valuation and return on equity, and generates solid operating margins, representing a high-quality industrial franchise even if growth is currently weak at low single-digit percentages. Quality breakdown | Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above in the next 2 annual reporting periods, confirming sustained financial health. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow represents only 46% of net income, a red flag that may reflect high capital expenditure requirements in the coatings business that constrain true shareholder cash generation. | ||
Revenue and earnings growth are both below 5% annually, placing PPG at the lower end of specialty chemicals peers for growth, which means the primary investment thesis must rest on valuation rerating or margin expansion rather than top-line momentum. Bear case | Revenue growth accelerates to above 6% in at least one of the next 4 reported quarters, signaling a reacceleration of organic demand. | →Stable |
| CounterPPG's management has guided toward pricing power in architectural coatings; if raw material costs moderate, margin expansion can more than compensate for subdued volume growth. | ||
At $121.53 the stock is priced 8.9% above the analyst consensus target, meaning there is negative implied upside to the median professional estimate, which is unusual for a hold-rated name and suggests the near-term risk-reward is unfavorable.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Analyst consensus price targets rise above $130 within 6 months, driven by estimate revisions following earnings results.
CounterPPG's positive price momentum and rising analyst sentiment score suggest that consensus estimates may be lagging the fundamental improvement; targets could be revised higher post-earnings.
Momentum scored 7.1 out of 10 with rising on-balance volume, MACD in positive territory, and the stock trading above its 200-day moving average, while RSI of 72 indicates that near-term buying pressure has pushed the stock into overbought territory.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- RSI returns to below 60 without a significant price correction, allowing the momentum to consolidate at a healthier level before advancing further.
CounterOverbought conditions in a stock with strong institutional accumulation can persist for extended periods; RSI above 70 is not automatically a sell signal in uptrending markets.
PPG scores a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, ranks above peers on both valuation and return on equity, and generates solid operating margins, representing a high-quality industrial franchise even if growth is currently weak at low single-digit percentages.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Piotroski F-Score remains at 7 or above in the next 2 annual reporting periods, confirming sustained financial health.
CounterFree cash flow represents only 46% of net income, a red flag that may reflect high capital expenditure requirements in the coatings business that constrain true shareholder cash generation.
Revenue and earnings growth are both below 5% annually, placing PPG at the lower end of specialty chemicals peers for growth, which means the primary investment thesis must rest on valuation rerating or margin expansion rather than top-line momentum.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Revenue growth accelerates to above 6% in at least one of the next 4 reported quarters, signaling a reacceleration of organic demand.
CounterPPG's management has guided toward pricing power in architectural coatings; if raw material costs moderate, margin expansion can more than compensate for subdued volume growth.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 6.9 |
| ROA | 4.2 |
| Gross margin | 4.3 |
| Op margin | 5.5 |
| Net margin | 4.9 |
| Current ratio | 5.8 |
| FCF quality | 3.7 |
| Moat | 6.1 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: 46% FCF/NI
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
3.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.2 |
| EPS growth | 2.8 |
Momentum
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 4.9 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Negligible insider buying — $1,398 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.0/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.3 |
| quality rank | 7.8 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
Technical
3.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.9 |
| 52w position | 8.8 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.9 |
| days to cover | 6.5 |
| volatility | 5.2 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 6.1 |
| beta | 6.8 |
| debt equity | 5.4 |
Catalyst
5.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 5.6 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.7 |
| dividend safety | 6.5 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
- ▸Dividend: 235.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position. | News modifier +1 (SELL_IF_HOLDING → HOLD_IF_HOLDING).
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELL|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1Passed (6)
- MOMENTUM:6.8>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:33d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.90
Upside
-10.8%
Downside
12.1%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupBREAKOUT — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 69, MACD bullish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.3 below the 5.4 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Momentum at 6.8) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.90 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 6.8, Risk (lower is worse) at 6.8, and Value at 6.0; the weakest are Growth at 3.5, Technical at 3.7, and Catalyst at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.90 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Momentum scored 7.1 out of 10 with rising on-balance volume, MACD in positive territory, and the stock trading above its 200-day moving average, while RSI of 72 indicates that near-term buying pressure has pushed the stock into overbought territory.
Trip ifRSI remains above 75 for more than 20 consecutive trading days, indicating sustained overbought conditions increasing the risk of a sharp correction.
- P2At $121.53 the stock is priced 8.9% above the analyst consensus target, meaning there is negative implied upside to the median professional estimate, which is unusual for a hold-rated name and suggests the near-term risk-reward is unfavorable.
Trip ifThe stock price rises more than 15% above the analyst consensus price target and stays there for more than 30 calendar days.
- P3PPG scores a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, ranks above peers on both valuation and return on equity, and generates solid operating margins, representing a high-quality industrial franchise even if growth is currently weak at low single-digit percentages.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 in any reported annual period over the next 12 months.
- P4Revenue and earnings growth are both below 5% annually, placing PPG at the lower end of specialty chemicals peers for growth, which means the primary investment thesis must rest on valuation rerating or margin expansion rather than top-line momentum.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below negative 3% year-over-year in any reported quarter, indicating organic demand is contracting.