Cisco Systems
“10-K Item 1A: 'Products manufactured by Cisco Systems represented approximately 29%, 32%, and 44% of net sales for the years ended March 31, 2026, 2025, and 2024, respectively.'”
Updated
The most significant concentration ePlus discloses is Cisco Systems at 29%, classified MEDIUM by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: ePlus’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'Products manufactured by Cisco Systems represented approximately 29%, 32%, and 44% of net sales for the years ended March 31, 2026, 2025, and 2024, respectively.'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Sales to Verizon Communications Inc. represented 24%, 17%, and 19% of our net sales'”
The company's disclosed concentration profile spans both the supply side and the customer side, with each exposure at a different size band. On supply, products manufactured by Cisco Systems represented approximately 29% of net sales for the year ended March 31, 2026 — a moderate supplier concentration where revenue is tied to Cisco's product roadmap, pricing policies, and the company's continued authorized-partner standing. Any material change to that relationship — a partner-tier adjustment, a pricing restructuring, or a shift in Cisco's go-to-market strategy toward direct sales — would directly affect gross economics across a meaningful portion of the business. On the customer side, sales to Verizon Communications Inc. represented 24% of net sales — a low-share dependency on a single enterprise customer whose purchasing volumes and technology refresh decisions can swing revenue within a fiscal year. Large enterprise accounts of this scale tend to have multi-year refresh cycles, which provides some near-term visibility but also concentrates renewal risk at contract inflection points. The two exposures are structurally independent — a supply-side concentration and a demand-side concentration — and do not directly compound each other under normal conditions. A simultaneous disruption to both would be the tail scenario. On balance, the Cisco supply dependency is the more systemic exposure given its share of revenue, while the Verizon customer concentration is the more idiosyncratic one whose renewal dynamics should be tracked quarterly.
For the engine’s reasoning on PLUS’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK | Autodesk, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ADEA | Adeia Inc. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| AGYS | Agilysys, Inc. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| PLUS● | ePlus inc. | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ADBE | Adobe Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ADP | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.