Value
9.0/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.5 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 9.5x
- ▸PEG: 0.17
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
POSCO Holdings is a South Korean steel producer with a quality score of 2.6 out of 10 and free cash flow deeply negative at -239% of net income, currently flagged for materials cycle peak risk as the forward P/E of 11.6x on a forward-to-trailing ratio of 0.33x suggests the current earnings may be at a cyclical high.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
POSCO has triggered the materials cycle peak gate with a forward P/E of 11.6x (below 12x threshold) and a forward-to-trailing P/E ratio of 0.33x (below 0.55x threshold), indicating forward earnings estimates have already collapsed relative to trailing — a classic cycle peak signal for commodity producers. Bear case | Forward earnings estimates recover and the forward-to-trailing ratio rises above 0.55x within 12 months as steel prices stabilize at profitable levels. | →Stable |
| CounterSteel cycle peaks often look worse on forward multiples than they actually are if analysts have over-corrected the forward estimate; a modest recovery in steel prices could sharply improve the forward picture. | ||
At a forward P/E of 11.6x and PEG ratio of 0.21, POSCO screens as attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth, with analysts projecting 30% upside to a target of $71.98 from a current price of $65.21. Valuation breakdown | Price rises above $70.00 within 12 months as the valuation gap to analyst targets partially closes and steel market conditions stabilize. | →Stable |
| CounterCommodity producer valuations are notoriously difficult to assess at cycle turns; the low PEG ratio may reflect analyst estimates that are too optimistic given the negative FCF and cycle peak signals. | ||
With RSI at 29, the stock is oversold in an uptrend with rising OBV (volume accumulation) and the 200-day moving average still above the current price — a technical condition that historically precedes rebounds in cyclical stocks. Momentum breakdown | RSI rises above 45 and momentum score exceeds 5.5 within 3 months as the oversold condition normalizes. | →Stable |
| CounterOversold conditions in cyclical materials stocks can persist for extended periods if the fundamental headwinds (negative FCF, cycle peak) dominate the technical picture; RSI of 29 can reach 15 before reversing. | ||
Free cash flow is -239% of net income — a severe earnings quality red flag indicating the company is consuming substantially more cash than it reports as net income — and the quality score is 2.6 out of 10, below the 4.0 minimum threshold. Quality breakdown | FCF improves to at least 0% of net income within 12 months as capital expenditure cycles moderate and operating cash flow recovers. | →Stable |
| CounterLarge steel producers routinely carry negative FCF during major capacity investment cycles; the 8/9 Piotroski F-Score suggests the company's balance sheet strength is otherwise sound. | ||
CounterSteel cycle peaks often look worse on forward multiples than they actually are if analysts have over-corrected the forward estimate; a modest recovery in steel prices could sharply improve the forward picture.
CounterCommodity producer valuations are notoriously difficult to assess at cycle turns; the low PEG ratio may reflect analyst estimates that are too optimistic given the negative FCF and cycle peak signals.
CounterOversold conditions in cyclical materials stocks can persist for extended periods if the fundamental headwinds (negative FCF, cycle peak) dominate the technical picture; RSI of 29 can reach 15 before reversing.
CounterLarge steel producers routinely carry negative FCF during major capacity investment cycles; the 8/9 Piotroski F-Score suggests the company's balance sheet strength is otherwise sound.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.5 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4 |
| ROA | 0.8 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.6 |
| Net margin | 0.6 |
| Current ratio | 6.7 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.5 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.1 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 4.0 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.5 |
| quality rank | 2.0 |
| growth rank | 2.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.5 |
| support resistance | 9.8 |
| 52w position | 1.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.8 |
| days to cover | 6.5 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 7.2 |
| implied vol | 3.4 |
| beta | 4.8 |
| debt equity | 8.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 7.2 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.55>1.3
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:1.2<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.0, Technical at 6.9, and Growth at 6.5; the weakest are Momentum at 1.2, Quality at 2.6, and Peer rank at 3.4. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.62 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward-to-trailing P/E ratio falls below 0.25x or forward EPS estimates decline more than 20% from current levels, indicating the cycle peak thesis is worsening.
Trip ifFCF remains below -300% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating worsening cash consumption beyond current levels.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target falls below $60.00, reducing implied upside to less than 0% from the current price of $65.21.
Trip ifRSI falls below 20 and price drops below $58.00, signaling a breakdown in the oversold-in-uptrend thesis.