Value
4.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 2.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 38.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.05
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
PDF Solutions has delivered 26% revenue growth year-over-year and a strong earnings beat streak of 3 out of 4 quarters, but the stock has reached analyst price targets and sits in overbought territory at RSI 75, making near-term risk/reward unfavorable.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
PDF Solutions grew revenue 26% year-over-year, placing it among the top growth names in software, and has beaten earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with an average upside surprise of 62%. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth remains above 15% year-over-year and the company posts an EPS beat in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterThe high-growth rate is from a small base; at a $2.7B market cap, sustaining 26% growth becomes harder and the forward P/E of 41.5x prices in continued acceleration with no margin for miss. | ||
Despite a relatively low overall quality score, the company has a strong Piotroski F-Score of 9/9 and a wide economic moat score, suggesting structural competitive advantages in its semiconductor process control niche. Quality breakdown | Moat indicators remain strong with Piotroski F-Score staying above 7 and gross margins remaining above current levels over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow is deeply negative at -436% relative to net income, a serious earnings quality red flag that undermines the quality thesis regardless of moat score. | ||
The stock trades within 0.8% of analyst resistance targets with RSI at 75, signaling the stock is overbought at current prices and near-term upside is effectively exhausted. Momentum breakdown | Price pulls back to at least 10% below current levels before establishing a new base, or analyst targets are raised above $75 to reset the upside case. | →Stable |
| CounterOverbought conditions in strong momentum stocks can persist for months; a rising RSI that holds above 60 over time can reflect fundamental re-rating rather than unsustainable speculation. | ||
Free cash flow is -436% relative to net income, meaning the company's reported profits are not backed by actual cash generation, raising concerns about earnings quality and sustainability. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow turns positive or reaches at least -50% of net income within the next 2 fiscal years as investment intensity moderates. | →Stable |
| CounterNegative FCF for a high-growth software company may reflect accelerated investment in growth rather than poor underlying unit economics; if revenue scales efficiently, FCF should improve without structural change. | ||
CounterThe high-growth rate is from a small base; at a $2.7B market cap, sustaining 26% growth becomes harder and the forward P/E of 41.5x prices in continued acceleration with no margin for miss.
CounterFree cash flow is deeply negative at -436% relative to net income, a serious earnings quality red flag that undermines the quality thesis regardless of moat score.
CounterOverbought conditions in strong momentum stocks can persist for months; a rising RSI that holds above 60 over time can reflect fundamental re-rating rather than unsustainable speculation.
CounterNegative FCF for a high-growth software company may reflect accelerated investment in growth rather than poor underlying unit economics; if revenue scales efficiently, FCF should improve without structural change.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 2.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.9 |
| ROA | 2.1 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 4.2 |
| Net margin | 1.6 |
| Current ratio | 8.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 7.9 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 7.6 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 4.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.1 |
| Price target | 4.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.4 |
| quality rank | 3.2 |
| growth rank | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.6 |
| support resistance | 2.0 |
| 52w position | 8.7 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.3 |
| days to cover | 9.1 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.4 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 4.3 |
| debt equity | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Mixed signals. Hold existing position.
L4:PATH_F_HOLD_DEFAULTnone
SetupBREAKOUT — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 61, MACD bullish
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — Beta 1.71>1.3, MCap $2.5B<$5B
The default F-path HOLD fired without any positive-conviction gate triggering — no momentum acceleration, no quality+value crossover, no setup recognition. Highest-clear gate: MOMENTUM:7.1>=5.5. Top dim: Growth at 9.0; weakest: Peer rank at 2.8. The engine's read is one of pattern absence — no directional conviction in either direction at current asymmetry.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.0, Catalyst at 7.5, and Momentum at 7.1; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.8, Value at 4.3, and Technical at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.37 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 in the next annual report, indicating deteriorating financial health across more than 3 metrics.
Trip ifStock price rises above $75 resistance without a corresponding upward revision in analyst targets, signaling further overvaluation.
Trip ifFree cash flow remains more than 200% negative relative to net income for 2 consecutive reported periods.